Advertisement

Where Is the ‘Organisation’ in the Urban Political?

  • Crispian Fuller
Chapter

Abstract

The broad field of urban politics has made substantial progress in understanding the heterogeneous actors, practices, conditions and events that produce, co-constitute and work through the ‘urban’. This literature does however resort to a broad comprehension of ‘actors’, treating these as relatively homogeneous entities in the case of actual organisations (e.g. voluntary sector bodies), or not recognising that individual human actors (e.g. politicians) are often embedded within organisational settings. What is lacking therefore is a more fully developed theorisation of the ‘organisation’ in urban studies. This chapter presents such as framework, the intention of which is to facilitate a more sensitive approach to the complexities and unevenness of urban actors, including a greater understanding of whether post-politics has truly developed in urban politics.

References

  1. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. (2007). Management accounting as practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1–2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [Anonymised] City Council ([ANONYMISED]). (2015). The budget and medium term financial strategy 2015/16. [Anonymised]: [Anonymised] City Council.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, C., & Bridge, G. (2013). Geographies of radical democracy: Agonistic pragmatism and the formation of affected interests. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beal, V., & Pinson, G. (2014). When mayors go global: International strategies, urban governance and leadership. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 302–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloom, P., & Cederstrom, C. (2009). The sky’s the limit: Fantasy in the age of market rationality. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2012). The alchemy of austerity. Critical Social Policy, 32(3), 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, N., & Cochrane, A. (2013). Geographies and politics of localism: The localism of the United Kingdom’s coalition government. Political Geography, 34, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. City Council [Anonymised]. (2014). The cuts: Facing reality. City Council.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 9(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson, M., & Iveson, K. (2014). Recovering the politics of the city: From the ‘post-political city’ to a ‘method of equality’ for critical urban geography. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donald, B., Glasmeier, D. A., Gray, M., & Lobao, L. (2014). Austerity in the city: Economic crisis and urban service decline? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DuGay, P. (2009). In defence of Mandarins: Recovering the ‘core business’ of public management. Management & Organizational History, 4(4), 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Featherstone, D. (2015). Thinking the crisis politically: Lineages of resistance to neo-liberalism and the politics of the present conjuncture. Space and Polity, 19(1), 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller, C. (2014). Urban politics and the social practices of critique and justification: Conceptual insights from French pragmatism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(5), 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuller, C. (2017). City government in an age of austerity: Discursive institutions and critique. Environment and Planning A, 49(4), 745–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuller, C., & West, K. (2016). The possibilities and limits of political contestation in times of ‘urban austerity’. Urban Studies. Epub ahead of print.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016651568
  21. Huault, I., Perret, V., & Spicer, A. (2014). Beyond macro- and micro-emancipation: Rethinking emancipation in organization studies. Organisation, 21(1), 22–49.Google Scholar
  22. IMD. (2015). English indices of deprivation 2015. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of deprivation- 2015 Google Scholar
  23. Inch, A. (2014). Ordinary citizens and the political cultures of planning: In search of the subject of a new democratic ethos. Planning Theory, 14(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
  24. Jagd, S. (2011). Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory, 14, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  26. John, P. (2014). The great survivor: The persistence and resilience of English local government. Local Government Studies, 40(5), 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King, B., Felin, T., & Whetten, D. (2009). Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21(1), 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1095–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuus, M. (2011). Bureaucracy and place: Expertise in the European quarter. Global Networks, 11, 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacLeod, G., & Jones, M. (2011). Renewing urban politics. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2443–2472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCann, E. (2016). Governing urbanism: Urban governance studies 1.0, 2.0 and beyond. Urban Studies, 54(2), 312–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCarthy, J. (2013). We have never been ‘post-political’. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 24(1), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milbourne, L., & Cushman, M. (2015). Complying, transforming or resisting in the new austerity? Realigning social welfare and independent action among English voluntary organization. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 463–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morgan, G. (1990). Organizations in society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Müller, M. (2012). Opening the black box of the organization: Socio-material practices of geopolitical ordering. Political Geography, 31, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newman, J. (2013). Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity. Urban Studies, 51(15), 3290–3305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nolan, L. J., & Featherstone, D. (2015). Contentious politics in austere times. Geography Compass, 9(6), 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oosterlynck, S., & Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Noise reduction: The postpolitical quandary of night flights at Brussels airport. Environment and Planning A, 42(7), 1577–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). Engaging practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective, and philosophy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook on strategy as practice (pp. 23–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 16(6), 626–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2013). Neoliberal urbanism Redux? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1091–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  45. Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schatzki, T. (2005). The site of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schatzki, T. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  50. Starbuck, W. (2003). The origins of organization theory. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of organization theory: Meta-theoretical perspectives (pp. 143–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antimonies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democracy: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Virno, P. (2006). The ambivalence of disenchantment. In P. Virno & M. Hardt (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  54. Warner, M., & Clifton, J. (2013). Marketisation, public services and the city: The potential for Polanyian counter movements. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. West, K. (2013). The grip of personalisation in adult social care. Between managerial domination and fantasy. Critical Social Policy, 33(4), 638–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams, A., Cloke, P., & Thomas, S. (2012). Co-constituting neoliberalism: Faith-based organizations, co-option, and resistance in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1479–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, A., Goodwin, M., & Cloke, P. (2014). Neoliberalism, big society, and progressive localism. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2798–2815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Crispian Fuller
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geography and PlanningCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations