Advertisement

Counter Publics and Counter Spaces

  • Walter Nicholls
  • Justus Uitermark
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this theoretical essay is to explore the links between the oppositional identities of marginalized groups and the cities where these groups are rooted. It performs the task by examining the spatial underpinnings of counter publics. Building alternative political imaginaries and oppositional publics necessarily involves the production of space. We therefore situate counter publics in their specific urban spaces, i.e., counter spaces. Our hope is to untangle some of the mechanisms linking the cities where combative groups emerge to the oppositional identities that fuel broader struggles for recognition and equality. The paper is theoretical in focus and content. Its central premises are illustrated by examples drawn from research on movements struggling for immigrant rights and LGQBT rights.

References

  1. Adam, B. D. (1987). The rise of a gay and lesbian movement. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, E. (2002). Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950 –1994. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beveridge, R., & Koch, P. (2017). The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city. Urban Studies, 51(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billings, D. (1990). Religion as opposition: A Gramscian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 96(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouthillette, A.-M. (1997). Queer and gendered housing: A tale of two neighbourhoods in Vancouver. In G. B. Ingram, A. M. Bouthillette, & Y. Retter (Eds.), Queers in space: Communities, public places, sites of resistance. Seattle, WA: Bay Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chauncey, G. (1995). Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the making of the gay male world, 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Chavez, L. (2008). The Latino threat: Constructing immigrants, citizens, and the nation. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dikeç, M. (2004). Voices into noises: Ideological determination of unarticulated justice movements. Space and Polity, 8(2), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duyvendak, J. W. (2011). The politics of home: Belonging and nostalgia in Europe and the United States. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elias, N. (1994). The established and the outsider. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, S. (1999). Gay and lesbian movements in the United States: Dilemmas of identity, diversity, and political strategy. In B. Adam, J. W. Duyvendak, & A. Krouwel (Eds.), Global emergence of gay and lesbian politics: National imprints of a worldwide movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, C. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 89(6), 1319–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality I: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25–26, 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Kohn, M. (2003). Radical space. Building the house of the people. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of structure and action. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Massey, D. (2008). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nicholls, W. J. (2013). Making undocumented immigrants into legitimate political subjects: A comparison of France and the United States. Theory, Culture and Society, 30(3), 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholls, W. J. (2016). Politicizing undocumented immigrants one corner at a time: Day laborers and the urban roots of the national immigrant rights movement. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(2), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nicholls, W. J., & Uitermark, J. (2015). Giving voice. The ambivalent roles of specific intellectuals in immigrant and LGBT movements. In J. Jasper & J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nicholls, W. J., & Uitermark, J. (2016a). Migrant cities: Place, power, and voice in the era of super diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 877–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nicholls, W. J., & Uitermark, J. (2016b). Planning/resistance. Urban Geography, 38(4), 512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Park, R. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Park, R., & Burgess, E. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determination of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saunders, P. (1986). Social theory and the urban question (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers, Inc..Google Scholar
  36. Snow, D., & Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1336–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snow, D., Benford, R., Rochford, E., & Worden, S. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uitermark, J., & Nicholls, W. J. (2014). From politicization to policing: The rise and decline of new social movements in Amsterdam and Paris. Antipode, 46(4), 970–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Nicholls
    • 1
  • Justus Uitermark
    • 2
  1. 1.Univeristy of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations