Advertisement

The Southern Urban Political in Transcalar Perspective: A View from the Squatter Movements of Belo Horizonte

  • Felipe N. C. Magalhães
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter provides an account of current disputes over urban land in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in dialogue with theoretical discussions in contemporary urban studies and critical geography concerning postcolonialism, neoliberalism and the right to the city, proposing the importance of pluralist perspectives in these debates. By analyzing a series of new land squats conducted and organized by new urban social movements in Belo Horizonte, the chapter addresses the insertion of these agents in the recent history of organized movements acting on planning and general urban issues. It also points to the need of trans-scalar panoramas to these processes, framing larger economic and political dynamics taking place in larger spatial scales and their connection to metropolitan Brazil today.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the editors for important feedback on drafts, along with Joshua Akers, Dan Cohen, Max Ritts and Trevor Wideman, who have contributed with valuable comments and critiques on previous versions of this piece.

References

  1. Abensour, M. (2010). Democracy against the state: Marx and the Machiavellian moment. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, A. (2014). Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7–8), 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power and the origins of our times. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, T., & Sheppard, E. (2010). ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bittencourt, R., Morado Nascimento, D., & Goulart, F. (2016). Ocupações Urbanas na Região Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte: Praxis UFMG. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/praxisufmg/docs/relato-ocupa-jun2016
  6. Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). Commun: essai sur la revolution au XXI e siècle. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. De Castro, E. V. (2014). Who’s afraid of the ontological wolf? CUSAS Annual Marilyn Strathern Lecture. Retrieved from www.academia.edu/12865685/Who_is_afraid:of_the_ontological_wolf
  9. Fernandes, E. (2005). A new statute for Brazilian cities. Mimeog. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/shs/es/files/6104/10928441881city_statute.pdf/city_statute.pdf
  10. Fernandes, E. (2007a). Implementing the urban reform agenda in Brazil. Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes, E. (2007b). Constructing the ‘right to the city’ in Brazil. Social Legal Studies, 16(2), 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graeber, D. (2015). Radical alterity is just another way of saying ‘reality’: A reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(2), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
  16. Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Magalhães, F. (2017). Thinking from June 2013 in the Brazilian metropolis: New urban political assemblages, old state-society relations. In V. Lawson & S. Elwood (Eds.), Relational poverty politics. Athens: UGA Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mignolo, W. (2007a). Introduction. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mignolo, W. (2007b). Delinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ostry, J. D., Loungani, P., & Furceri, D. (2016). Neoliberalism: Oversold? IMF Finance & Development, 53, 2. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2016/06/ostry.htm Google Scholar
  21. Parnell, S., & Oldfield, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Peck, J. (2015). Cities beyond compare? Regional Studies, 49(1), 160–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson, J., & Parnell, S. (2011). Travelling theory: Embracing post-neoliberalism through southern cities. In G. Bridge & S. Watson (Eds.), The new Blackwell companion to the city. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Santos, B. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Tonucci, J. (2015). Urban occupations as urban commons? Explorations from Belo Horizonte, Brazil. 1st IASC Thematic Conference on the Urban Commons, Track 1: Claiming the Urban Commons. Bologna.Google Scholar
  27. Vainer, C. (2014). Disseminanting ‘best practice’? The coloniality of urban knowledge and city models. In S. Parnell & S. Oldfield (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Velloso, R. (2015). A cidade contra o Estado: sobre a construção política de escalas e institucionalidades. In G. Costa (Ed.), Teorias e práticas urbanas—condições para a sociedade urbana. Belo Horizonte: C/Arte.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felipe N. C. Magalhães
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de GeociênciasUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations