Descriptive Analysis: Adaptation Aid Flows in the OECD CRS



Before we statistically test the drivers of adaptation aid allocation and qualitatively explore underlying decision-making processes, we want first to get a broad picture of adaptation aid flows. As described in greater detail in Chap.  3, the oecd introduced a so-called Rio marker for adaptation, or adaptation marker, in 2009. This marker allows us to trace adaptation aid flows over time, across donors, and across recipients. Again, however, we want to stress that the adaptation marker and the oecd crs are not without problems. The data suffer from inconsistent application of the marker, over-reporting, and double-counting of projects towards multiple objectives. These limitations should be kept in mind throughout this and the following chapter.


  1. Adaptation Watch. 2015. Toward Mutual Accountability: The 2015 Adaptation Finance Transparency Gap Report. Policy Briefing. Available online at
  2. Ayers, J.M., and A.C. Abeysinghe. 2013. International Aid and Adaptation to Climate Change. In The Handbook of Global Climate and Environmental Policy, chap. 28, ed. R. Falkner, 486–506. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, J. 2008. The Effect of Aid on Capacity to Adapt to Climate Change: Insights from Niue. Political Science 60(1): 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berthélemy, J.-C. 2006a. Aid Allocation: Comparing Donors’ Behaviours. Swedish Economic Policy Review 13: 75–109.Google Scholar
  5. Berthélemy, J.-C. 2006b. Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics 10(2): 179–194.Google Scholar
  6. Betzold, C. 2016,Aid and Adaptation to Climate Change in Pacific Island Countries. Development Policy Centre Discussion Paper 46. Development Policy Centre, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  7. Gulrajani, N. 2016. Bilateral versus Multilateral Aid Channels: Strategic Choices for Donors. odi Report. Available online at, Overseas Development Institute, London.
  8. Hudson, J. 2013. Promises Kept, Promises Broken? The Relationship Between Aid Commitments and Disbursements. Review of Development Finance 3: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. oecd. 2011. Handbook on the OECD-DAC Climate Markers. Available online at
  10. oecd. 2016a. Country Programmable Aid (CPA): Frequently Asked Questions. Available online at
  11. oecd. 2016b. dac Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts. Available online at Accessed 9 November 2016.
  12. oecd. 2016c. OECD.Stat Extracts. Available online at
  13. oecd. 2016d. Technical Guide to terms and data in the Creditor Reporting System (CRS) Aid Activities database. Available online at
  14. United Nations Statistics Division. 2014, December. Exchange Rates and Population. National Accounts Main Aggregates Database. Available online at
  15. Weikmans, R. 2016. Dimensions éthiques de l’allocation du financement international de l’adaptation au changement climatique. VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 16(2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Political ScienceUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.The School of Politics and International RelationsUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations