Advertisement

The History and Political Economy of Adaptation Aid

Chapter
  • 339 Downloads

Abstract

In order to understand better how adaptation aid is disbursed, we need to know where this new form of aid comes from, how it is related to development aid, and what the theoretical expectations for adaptation aid allocation are. This chapter addresses these questions and thus sets the stage for the empirical analyses later on.

References

  1. Adaptation Watch. 2015. Toward Mutual Accountability: The 2015 Adaptation Finance Transparency Gap Report. Policy Briefing. Available online at http://www.adaptationwatch.org/.
  2. AdaptationWatch. (Weikmans et al.) 2016. Towards Transparency. The 2016 Adaptation Finance Transparency Gap Report. White Paper. Available online at http://www.adaptationwatch.org/.
  3. Alesina, A., and D. Dollar. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth 5: 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayers, J.M., and A.C. Abeysinghe. 2013. International Aid and Adaptation to Climate Change. In The Handbook of Global Climate and Environmental Policy, chap. 28, ed. R. Falkner, 486–506. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayers, J.M., and D. Dodman. 2010. Climate Change Adaptation and Development I: The State of the Debate. Progress in Development Studies 10 (2): 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barr, R., S. Fankhauser, and K. Hamilton. 2010. Adaptation Investments: A Resource Allocation Framework. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15: 843–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett, S. 2013. Local Level Climate Justice? Adaptation Finance and Vulnerability Reduction. Global Environmental Change 23: 1819–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett, S. 2014. Subnational Climate Justice? Adaptation Finance Distribution and Climate Vulnerability. World Development 58: 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berthélemy, J.-C. 2006a. Aid Allocation: Comparing Donors’ Behaviours. Swedish Economic Policy Review 13: 75–109.Google Scholar
  10. Berthélemy, J.-C. 2006b. Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics 10 (2): 179–194.Google Scholar
  11. Betzold, C. 2015. Vulnerabilität, Demokratie, politische Interessen? Wie Deutschland seine Hilfe für Anpassung an den Klimawandel verteilt. [Vulnerability, Democracy, Political Interests? How Germany Allocates its Aid for Adaptation to Climate Change]. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 22 (1): 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Betzold, C., and F. Weiler. 2017. Allocation of Aid for Adaptation to Climate Change: Do Vulnerable Countries Receive More Support. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 17 (1): 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bird, N. 2011. Going Beyond Aid Effectiveness to Guide the Delivery of Climate Finance. odi Background Note. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Bodansky, D. 2010. The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: A Postmortem. American Journal of International Law 104: 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooks, N., W.N. Adger, and P.M. Kelly. 2005. The Determinants of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity at the National Level and the Implications for Adaptation. Global Environmental Change 15: 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, J., N. Bird, and L. Schalatek. 2010. Climate Finance Additionality: Emerging Definitions and Their Implications. Climate Finance Policy Brief No. 2. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. The Green Political Foundation. Available online at https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/6032.pdf.
  17. Burton, I. 1994. Deconstructing Adaptation... And Reconstructing. Delta 5 (1): 14–15.Google Scholar
  18. Burton, I., S. Huq, B. Lim, O. Pilifosova, and E.L. Schipper. 2002. From Impacts Assessment to Adaptation Priorities: The Shaping of Adaptation Policy. Climate Policy 2 (2–3): 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carty, T., J. Kowalzig, and A. Peterson. 2016. Climate Finance Shadow Report 2016: Lifting the Lid on Progress Towards the $100 Billion Commitment. Oxfam International. Available online at http://www.oxfamnovib.nl/Redactie/Pdf/bp-climate-finance-shadow-report-031116-en.pdf.
  20. Ciplet, D., J.T. Robert, and M. Khan. 2013. The Politics of International Climate Adaptation Funding: Justice and Divisions in the Greenhouse. Global Environmental Politics 13 (1): 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clist, P. 2011. 25 Years of Aid Allocation Practice: Whither Selectivity? World Development 39 (10): 1724–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. dara (2012). Climate Vulnerability Monitor. A Guide to the Cold Calculus of a Hot Planet. 2nd ed. Geneva: Fundación dara Internacional.Google Scholar
  23. Dasgupta, D., and Climate Change Finance Unit. 2015. Climate Change Finance, Analysis of a Recent OECD Report: Some Credible Facts Needed. Climate Change Finance Unit, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Available online at http://pibphoto.nic.in/documents/rlink/2015/nov/p2015112901.pdf.Google Scholar
  24. Davies, R.B., and S. Klasen. 2013. Of Donor Coordination, Free-Riding, Darlings, and Orphans: The Dependence of Bilateral Aid Commitments on Other Bilateral Giving. cesifo Working Paper No. 4177.Google Scholar
  25. Diamond, J., and C. Bruch. 2011. The International Architecture for Climate Change Adaptation Assistance. In Climate Change Adaptation and International Development: Making Development Cooperation More Effective, chap. 4.1, ed. R. Fujikura, and M. Kawanishi, 291–315. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  26. Dollar, D., and V. Levin. 2006. The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984–2003. World Development 34 (12): 2034–2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dreher, A., P. Nunnenkamp, and R. Thiele. 2008. Does Us Aid Buy un General Assembly Votes? A Disaggregated Analysis. Public Choice 136 (1–2): 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Drury, A.C., R.S. Olson, and D.A. Van Belle. 2005. The Politics of Humanitarian Aid: U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance, 1964–1995. The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 454–473.Google Scholar
  29. Dudley, L., and C. Montmarquette. 1976. A Model of the Supply of Bilateral Foreign Aid. The American Economic Review 66 (1): 132–142.Google Scholar
  30. Duus-Otterström, G. 2015. Allocating Climate Adaptation Finance: Examining Three Ethical Arguments for Recipient Control. International Environmental Agreements 16 (6): 655–670.Google Scholar
  31. Eriksen, S.H., and P.M. Kelly. 2007. Developing Credible Vulnerability Indicators for Climate Adaptation Policy Assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12: 495–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fankhauser, S. 2010. The Costs of Adaptation. WIRES Climate Change 1: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fankhauser, S., and I. Burton. 2011. Spending Adaptation Money Wisely. Climate Policy 11: 1037–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Figaj, M. 2010. Who Gets Environmental Aid? The Characteristics of Global Environmental Aid Distribution. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 12 (3): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fuhr, L., L. Schalatek, and S. Ilse. 2016. ‘We’ll always have Paris’. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. The Green Political Foundation. Available online at http://www.boell.de/en/2016/12/01/well-always-have-paris.
  36. Füssel, H.-M. 2009. Review and Quantitative Analysis of Indices of Climate Change Exposure, Adaptive Capacity, Sensitivity, and Impacts. Technical Report, Background Note to the World Development Report 2010.Google Scholar
  37. Füssel, H.-M. 2010. How Inequitable is the Global Distribution of Responsibility, Capability, and Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Comprehensive Indicator-based Assessment. Global Environmental Change 20: 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Government of Sweden. 2014. Aid Policy Framework – The Direction of Swedish Aid. Government Communication 2013/14:131.Google Scholar
  39. Grasso, M. 2010a. An Ethical Approach to Climate Adaptation Finance. Global Environmental Change 20: 74–81.Google Scholar
  40. Grasso, M. 2010b. Justice in Funding Adaptation under the International Climate Change Regime. Dordrecht etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Green Climate Fund. 2014. 3.3 Policies for Resource Allocation. 6th Board Meeting, Decision B.06/06, Bali, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  42. Guillaumont, P., and C. Simonet. 2011. Designing an Index of Physical Vulnerability to Climate Change. Available online at http://www.ferdi.fr/sites/www.ferdi.fr/files/idi/B18.pdf. Ferdi Policy Brief.
  43. Gulrajani, N. 2016. Bilateral Versus Multilateral Aid Channels: Strategic Choices for Donors. odi Report. Available online at https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/10492.pdf, Overseas Development Institute, London.
  44. Gupta, J. 1997. The Climate Change Convention and Developing Countries: From Conflict to Consensus? Boston/London/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Gupta, J. 2010. A History of International Climate Change Policy. WIRES Climate Change 1: 636–653.Google Scholar
  46. Gupta, J. 2014. The History of Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Halimanjaya, A. 2013. Climate Finance Across Developing Countries: What Are the Major Determinants? DEV Working Paper 45. University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  48. Halimanjaya, A. 2015. Climate Mitigation Finance Across Developing Countries: What Are the Major Determinants? Climate Policy 15 (2): 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harmeling, S., and A.O. Kaloga. 2011. Understanding the Political Economy of the Adaptation Fund. IDS Bulletin 42 (3): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris, P.G. 1999. Common But Differentiated Responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy. New York University Environmental Law Journal 7 (1): 27–48.Google Scholar
  51. Hicks, R.L., B.C. Parks, J.T. Robert, and M.J. Tierney. 2008. Greening Aid? Understanding the Environmental Impact of Development Assistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hinkel, J. 2011. “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a Clarification of the Science–Policy Interface. Global Environmental Change 21: 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hoeffler, A., and V. Outram. 2011. Need, Merit, or Self-Interest—What Determines the Allocation of Aid? Review of Development Economics 15 (2): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Horstmann, B. 2011. Operationalizing the Adaptation Fund: Challenges in Allocating Funds to the Vulnerable. Climate Policy 11 (4): 1086–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Huhtala, A., S. Curto, and P. Ambrosi. 2010. Monitoring Climate Finance and oda. World Bank Issues Brief 1.Google Scholar
  56. Huq, S. 2016. Adaptation Finance: Climate Change’s Forgotten Child. Climate Home. Available online at http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/11/15/adaptation-finance-climate-changes-forgotten-child/.
  57. Huq, S., and J.M. Ayers. 2008. Streamlining Adaptation to Climate Change into Development Projects at the National and Local Level. In Financing Climate Change Policies in Developing Countries, ed. European Parliament, Number PE 408.546- IP/A/CLIP/A/CLIM/ST/2008-13. European Parliament.Google Scholar
  58. Kaly, U., C. Pratt, and J. Mitchell. 2004. The Environmental Vulnerability Index (evi) 2004. Secretariat of the Pacific Community Applied Geoscience and Technology Division (sopac) Technical Report 384. Available online at http://www.sopac.org/sopac/evi/Files/EVI%202004%20Technical%20Report.pdf.
  59. Kevlihan, R., K. DeRouen Jr., and G. Biglaiser. 2014. Is US Humanitarian Aid Based Primarily on Need or Self-Interest? International Studies Quarterly 58: 839–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Khan, M.R., and T.J. Roberts. 2013. Adaptation and International Climate Policy. WIRES Climate Change 4: 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Klasen, S., and R.B. Davies. 2011. Of Donor Coordination, Free-Riding, Darlings, and Orphans: The Dependence of Bilateral Aid Commitments on Other Bilateral Giving. Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011, No. 47.Google Scholar
  62. Klein, R.J. 2009. Identifying Countries that Are Particularly Vulnerable to the Adverse Effects of Climate Change: An Academic or a Political Challenge? Carbon & Climate Law Review 3 (3): 284–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Klein, R.J. 2010. Linking Adaptation and Development Finance: A Policy Dilemma Not Addressed in Copenhagen. Climate and Development 2 (3): 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Klein, R.J., and A. Möhner. 2011. The Political Dimension of Vulnerability: Implications for the Green Climate Fund. IDS Bulletin 42 (3): 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lewis, T.L. 2003. Environmental Aid: Driven by Recipient Need or Donor Interest? Social Science Quarterly 84 (1): 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lightfoot, S., G.A. Davies, and R. Johns. 2016. Needs and Interests: Understanding the British Public’s Balancing of Aid Priorities. Paper presented at the Workshop ‘The Domestic Dimensions of Development Cooperation’, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, 24–25 October 2016.Google Scholar
  67. McKinlay, R.D. 1978. The German Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Models of the Distribution of German Bilateral Aid 1961–70. European Journal of Political Research 6: 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McKinlay, R.D., and R. Little. 1977. A Foreign Policy Model of U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocation. World Politics 30 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McKinlay, R.D., and R. Little. 1979. The U.S. Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and Donor Interest Models. Political Studies 27 (2): 236–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Miller, D.C. 2014. Explaining Global Patterns of International Aid for Linked Biodiversity Conservation and Development. World Development 59: 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Moss, R.H., A.L. Brenkert, and E.L. Malone. 2001. Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Quantitative Approach. Technical Report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory PNNL-SA-33642. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  72. Muccione, V., S.K. Allend, C. Huggel, and J. Birkmann. 2017. Differentiating Regions for Adaptation Financing: The Role of Global Vulnerability and Risk Distributions. WIREs Climate Change 8 (2): e447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nakhooda, S., T. Fransen, T. Kuramochi, A. Caravani, A. Prizzon, N. Shimizu, H. Tilley, A. Halimanjaya, and B. Welham. 2013. Mobilising International Climate Finance: Lessons from the Fast-Start Finance Period. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, World Resources Institute, and Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  74. nd-gain (n.d.). nd-gain: Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index. Available online at http://index.gain.org/. Last accessed 15 March 2017.
  75. oecd. 2011. Handbook on the OECD-DAC Climate Markers. Available online at www.oecd.org/dac/stats/48785310.pdf.
  76. oecd. 2016a. dac Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/dac/dac-glossary.htm. Accessed 9 Nov 2016.
  77. oecd. 2016b. Development aid rises again in 2015, spending on refugees doubles. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/development-aid-rises-again-in-2015-spending-on-refugees-doubles.htm. Accessed 9 Nov 2016.
  78. Oxfam International. 2007. Adapting to Climate Change: What’s Needed in Poor Countries, and Who Should Pay. Oxfam Briefing Paper 104. Available online at https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/adapting%20to%20climate%20change.pdf.
  79. Parliament of the United Kingdom. 2015. International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act 2015. Chapter 12. Available online at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/12/pdfs/ukpga_20150012_en.pdf.
  80. Parry, M., N.W. Arnell, M. Hulme, R. Nicholls, and M. Livermore. 1998. Adapting to the Inevitable. Nature 395, 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Persson, Å., and E. Remling. 2014. Equity and Efficiency in Adaptation Finance: Initial Experiences of the Adaptation Fund. Climate Policy 14 (4): 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Peterson Carvalho, A., and P. Terpstra, 2015. Tracking Adaptation Finance: An Approach for Civil Society Organizations to Improve Accountability for Climate Change Adaptation. Oxfam America Inc. and World Resources Institute. Available online at http://www.wri.org/publication/tracking-adaptation-finance.
  83. Pielke, R.A. 1998. Rethinking the Role of Adaptation in Climate Policy. Global Environmental Change 8 (2): 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Remling, E., and Å. Persson. 2015. Who is Adaptation for? Vulnerability and Adaptation Benefits in Proposals Approved by the UNFCCC Adaptation Fund. Climate and Development 7 (1): 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Roberts, T.J., and R. Weikmans. 2015. The Unfinished Agenda of the Paris Climate Talks: Finance to the Global South. Brookings Series: Understanding COP21 and Beyond, Number 24. December 22. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/planetpolicy/posts/2015/12/22-cop21-unfinished-agenda-finance-global-south-roberts-weikmans.
  86. Roberts, J.T., and R. Weikmans. 2017. Postface: Fragmentation, Failing Trust and Enduring Tensions over What Counts as Climate Finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 17 (1): 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Roberts, T.J., R. Weikmans, and C. Jones. 2017. Allocating Climate Adaptation Finance: Shifting Positions in the Scholarly and Policy Realms.Google Scholar
  88. Robertsen, J., N. Francken, and N. Molenaers. 2015. Determinants of The Flow of Bilateral Adaptation-Related Climate Change Financing to Sub-Saharan African Countries. LICOS Discussion Paper 373/2015. Catholic University Leuven.Google Scholar
  89. Robinson, S.-A., and M. Dornan. 2017. International Financing for Climate Change Adaptation in Small Island Developing States. Regional Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1085-1.
  90. Schipper, E.L.F. 2006. Conceptual History of Adaptation in the unfccc Process. RECIEL: Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 15 (1): 82–92.Google Scholar
  91. Sharma, A. 2017. Precaution and Post-caution in the Paris Agreement: Adaptation, Loss and Damage and Finance. Climate Policy 17 (1): 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16 (3): 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Smith, J.B., T. Dickinson, J.D.B. Donahue, I. Burton, E. Haites, R.J. Klein, and A. Patwardhan. 2011. Development and Climate Change Adaptation Funding: Coordination and Integration. Climate Policy 11: 987–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stadelmann, M., J.T. Roberts, and A. Michaelowa. 2010. Keeping a Big Promise: Options for Baselines to Assess “New and Additional” Climate Finance. Centre for Comparative and International Studies (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) Working Paper No. 66.Google Scholar
  95. Stadelmann, M., Å. Persson, I. Ratajczak-Juszko, and A. Michaelowa. 2014. Equity and Cost-Effectiveness of Multilateral Adaptation Finance: Are They Friends or Foes? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 14: 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stern, N.H. 2009. Blueprint for a Safer Planet. How to Manage Climate Change and Create a New Era of Progress and Prosperity. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  97. Stone, C.D. 2004. Common But Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law. American Journal of International Law 98: 276–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Turner, B.L., R.E. Kasperson, P.A. Matsone, J.J. McCarthy, R.W. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J.X. Kasperson, A. Luers, M.L. Martello, C. Polsky, A. Pulsiphera, and A. Schiller. 2003. A Framework for Vulnerability Analysis in Sustainability Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (14): 8074–8079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. undp. 2007. Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World. United Nations Development Programme, New York. Available online at http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/268/hdr_20072008_en_complete.pdf.
  100. unfccc. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Document FCCC/INFORMAL/84.Google Scholar
  101. unfccc. 1995. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its first session, held at Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995. Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its first session. Document FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1.Google Scholar
  102. unfccc. 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Decision 1/CP.3. Document FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1.Google Scholar
  103. unfccc. 2001. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Addendum. Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties. Document FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1.Google Scholar
  104. unfccc. 2003. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Ninth Session, held at Milan from 1 to 12 December 2003. Addendum. Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at Its Ninth Session. Document FCCC/CP/2003/6/Add.1.Google Scholar
  105. unfccc. 2004. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Tenth Session, held at Buenos Aires from 6 to 18 December 2004 Addendum Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at Its Tenth Session. Document FCCC/CP/2004/10/Add.1.Google Scholar
  106. unfccc. 2007. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Thirteenth Session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007 Addendum Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at its thirteenth session. Document FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1.Google Scholar
  107. unfccc. 2008. Report of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its Fourth Session, held in Poznan from 1 to 12 December 2008. Addendum. Decision 1/CMP.4: Adaptation Fund. FCCC/KP/CMP/2008/11/Add.2.Google Scholar
  108. unfccc. 2009. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Fifteenth Session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at Its Fifteenth Session. Document FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1.Google Scholar
  109. unfccc. 2010. The Cancún Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action Under the Convention. Decision 1/CP.16. Document FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1.Google Scholar
  110. unfccc. 2011. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventeenth Session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. Addendum. Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at Its Seventeenth Session. Document FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1.Google Scholar
  111. unfccc. 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Decision 1/CP.21. Document FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1.Google Scholar
  112. unfccc. 2016. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Twenty-Second Session, held in Marrakech from 7 to 18 November 2016. Addendum. Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at Its Twenty-Second Session. FCCC/CP/2016/10/Add.1.Google Scholar
  113. United Nations. 2002. Monterrey Consensus of the International Conference on Financing for Development. The Final Text of Agreements and Commitments Adopted at the International Conference on Financing for Development, Monterrey, Mexico, 18–22 March 2002. Available online at http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/MonterreyConsensus.pdf.
  114. Weikmans, R. 2016a. Dimensions éthiques de l’allocation du financement international de l’adaptation au changement climatique. VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 16 (2).Google Scholar
  115. Weikmans, R. 2016b. Le rôle de la coopération au développement dans le financement international de l’adaptation au changement climatique. In La nouvelle géographie du développement. Coopérer dans un monde en mutation, ed. A. Zacharie, 175–185. Brussels: Éditions Le Bord de l’Eau.Google Scholar
  116. Weiler, F., C. Betzold, and M. Dornan. 2017. Vulnerability or Donor Interests? The Allocation of Aid for Climate Change Adaptation. Paper presented at the Comparative Politics Seminars, 5 April 2017, University of Kent, Canterbury, UKGoogle Scholar
  117. Wheeler, D. 2011. Quantifying Vulnerability to Climate Change: Implications for Adaptation Assistance. Centre for Global Development Working Paper 240.Google Scholar
  118. World Bank. 2006. Managing Climate Risk: Integrating Adaptation into World Bank Group Operations. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  119. Younas, J. 2008. Motivations for Bilateral Aid Allocation: Altruism or Trade Benefits. European Journal of Political Economy 24: 661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zanger, S.C. 2000. Good Governance and European Aid: The Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics 1 (3): 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Political ScienceUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.The School of Politics and International RelationsUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations