Skip to main content

Incident Detection in Industrial Processes Utilizing Machine Learning Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance – ISPEM 2017 (ISPEM 2017)

Abstract

This work provides a comparative analysis of the most popular and widely used classification algorithms applied in industrial processes, in order to tackle the issue of incident detection of abnormal situations. The proposed analysis is based on actual datasets from derived by the operation of a chemical process system situated at the premises of CERTH/CPERI. The evaluation of the tested methods is based on cross-validation using a series of Monte-Carlo simulations among several free parameters of tested classifiers and finally the application of the Adaptive Boosting technique. The experimental results are highly reliable as the accuracy reaches 98% and the F-measure metric achieves a score over 97%. Therefore, the detection of potential malfunctions is achieved using the proposed machine learning techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.N.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, ACM, pp. 144–152 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L.: Random forests – random features. Technical Report 567, Statistics Department, University of California, Berkeley, ftp://stat.berkeley.edu/pub/users/breiman

  3. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A desicion-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. In: Computational Learning Theory, Springer, pp. 23–37 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ge, Z., Song, Z.: Semiconductor manufacturing process monitoring based on adaptive substatistical PCA. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 23(1), 99–108 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghouse, F., Natarajan, P., Subramanian, S.: Fault diagnosis of batch reactor using machine learning methods. Model. Simul. Eng. 2014 (2014), Article ID 426402

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gowthami, R., Vijayachitra, S.: Fault detection and diagnosis in continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). Int. J. Tech. Res. Appl. 3(2), 07–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, S.J., Siau, K.: A review of data mining techniques. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 101(1), 41–46 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Markou, M., Singh, S.: Novelty detection: a review-part 1: statistical approaches. Signal Process. 83(12), 2481–2497 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Munirathinam, S., Ramadoss, B.: Predictive models for equipment fault detection in the semiconductor manufacturing process. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 8(4), 273 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nath, S.V., Behara, R.S.: Customer churn analysis in the wireless industry: a data mining approach. In: Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, pp. 505–510 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papadopoulos, S., Drosou, A., Dimitriou, N., Abdelrahman, O.H., Gorbil, G., Tzovaras, D.: A BRPCA based approach for anomaly detection in mobile networks. In: 30th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 363, pp. 115–124 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Praveenkumara, T., Saimuruganb, M., Krishnakumarc, P., Ramachandrand, K.I.: Fault diagnosis of automobile gearbox based on machine learning techniques. Procedia Eng. 97, 2092–2098 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Russell, E.L., Chiang, L.H., Braatz, R.D.: Fault detection in industrial processes using canonical variate analysis and dynamic principal component analysis. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 51, 81–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Santos, P., Villa, L.F., Reñones, A., Bustillo, A., Maudes, J.: An SVM-based solution for fault detection in wind turbines. Sensors 15, 5627–5648 (2015). doi:10.3390/s150305627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schapire, R.E., Freund, Y.: Boosting: Foundations and Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiprungsri, S., Vasarhelyi, M.A.: Cluster analysis for anomaly detection in accounting data: an audit approach. Int. J. Digit. Acc. Res. 11, 69–84 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vafeiadis, T., Ioannidis, D., Krinidis, S., Ziogou, C., Voutetakis, S., Tzovaras, D., Likothanassis, S.: Real-time incident detection: An approach for two interdependent time series. In: 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 1418–1422 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yuan, F., Cheu, R.L.: Incident detection using support vector machines. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 11(3), 309–328 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work has been partially supported by the European Commission through the project HORIZON 2020-INNOVATION ACTIONS (IA)-636302-SATISFACTORY.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanasis Vafeiadis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tziroglou, G., Vafeiadis, T., Ziogou, C., Krinidis, S., Voutetakis, S., Tzovaras, D. (2018). Incident Detection in Industrial Processes Utilizing Machine Learning Techniques. In: Burduk, A., Mazurkiewicz, D. (eds) Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance – ISPEM 2017. ISPEM 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 637. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64465-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64465-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64464-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64465-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics