Advertisement

Policy Options for Enhancing Individual and Organizational Integrity

  • James F. Albrecht
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Criminology book series (BRIEFSCRIMINOL)

Abstract

Understanding the potential root causes for the different forms of police deviance will permit police leaders and policy makers to consider and develop revised policy and procedural guidelines that could enhance individual and organizational integrity and professionalism. Prehiring vetting measures can be improved to ensure that potentially problematic employees would not be hired in the first place. Considerations in this regard would involve specifically enhanced psychological screening and more thorough background investigation. Further research is required to determine if the findings of identified indices on commonly used psychological screening instruments and personality indices that have proven to be highly correlated with police deviance and later misconduct can be replicated in an effort to more effectively screen for potentially problematic behavior later in an officer’s career. Many research studies have indicated that requiring 2–4 years of college education prior to hiring will generally result in more professional and effective police personnel. In addition, random and targeted drug and alcohol testing should be strongly considered in an effort to maintain higher police professional standards.

Keywords

Police personality testing Police psychological screening Police drug testing Leadership Police integrity 

References

  1. Aamodt, M. G. (2000). The role of the I/O psychologist in police psychology. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 15, 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aamodt, M. G. (2004). Research in law enforcement selection. Boca Raton, FL: Brown Walker Press.Google Scholar
  3. Albrecht, J. F. (2011a). Three decades of policing reform in the New York City Police Department. In J. F. Albrecht & D. K. Das (Eds.), Effective crime reduction strategies: International perspectives. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  4. Albrecht, J. F. (2011b). Analyzing the implementation and evolution of community policing in the United States and Scandinavia. In M. Guzman, A. M. Das, & D. K. Das (Eds.), Strategic responses to crime: Thinking globally, acting locally. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arrigo, B. A., & Claussen, N. (2003). Police corruption and psychological testing: A strategy for preemployment screening. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(3), 272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartol, C. R. (1991). Predictive validation of the MMPI for small-town police officers who fail. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 22, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonsignore v. City of New York 521 F. Supp. 394, aff’d 683 F.2d 635, 2nd Cir. (1982).Google Scholar
  9. Burbeck, E., & Furnham, E. (1984). Personality and police selection: Trait differences in successful and non-successful applicants to the metropolitan police. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 5(3), 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colaprete, F. A. (2012). Pre-employment background investigations for public safety professionals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory and new five factor inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  12. Costello, R. M., Schneider, S. L., & Schoenfeld, L. S. (1996). Validation of a preemployment MMPI index correlated with disciplinary suspension days of police officers. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costello, R. M., Schoenfeld, L. S., & Kobos, J. (1982). Police applicant screening: An analogue study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dantzker, M. L. (2011). Psychological pre-employment screening for police candidates: Seeking consistency if not standardization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(3), 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Detrick, P., & Chibnall, J. T. (2006). NEO PI-R personality characteristics of high performing entry-level police officers. Psychological Services, 3, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fyfe, J. J., Jones, P. R., Kane, R., & Silver, C. (2002). Bad cops: A study of career-ending misconduct among New York City police officers. Chicago, IL: Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
  17. Fyfe, J. J., & Kane, R. (2006). Bad cops: A study of career-ending misconduct among New York City police officers. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  18. Gips, M. (1998). A corrupt personality? Security Management, 42(9), 14.Google Scholar
  19. Hardy v. Town of Hayneville 50 F.Supp.2d 1176 M.D. Ala. (1999).Google Scholar
  20. Hargrove, G. E., & Hiatt, D. (1989). Use of the California Psychological Inventory in law enforcement officer selection. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hargrove, G. E., Hiatt, D., & Gaffney, T. W. (1988). F + 4 + 9 + Cn: An MMPI measure of aggression in law enforcement officers and applicants. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 268–273.Google Scholar
  22. Inwald, R. E., & Brockwell, A. L. (1991). Predicting the performance of government security personnel with the IPI and MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56(3), 522–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inwald, R. E., & Shusman, E. J. (1984). The IPI and MMPI as predictors of academy performance for police recruits. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, L. B. (1965, March 8). Special message to the congress on law enforcement and the administration of justice. Online by G. Peters & J. T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=26800
  25. Knatz, H. F., Inwald, R. E., Brockwell, A. L., & Tran, L. N. (1992). IPI and MMPI predictions of counterproductive job behaviors by racial group. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kornfield, A. D. (1995). Police officer candidate MMPI-2 performance: Gender, ethnic and normative factors. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 536–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pallone, N. J. (1992). The MMPI in police officer selection: Legal constraints, case law, empirical data. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 17, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Report of the president’s commission on law enforcement and administration of justice. Washington, DC: White House.Google Scholar
  29. Sanders, B. A. (2008). Using personality traits to predict police officer performance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 31(1), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarchione, C. D., Cuttler, M. J., Muchinsky, P. M., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1998). Prediction of dysfunctional job behaviors among law enforcement officers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 904–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scogin, F., Schumacher, J., Gardner, J., & Chaplin, W. (1995). Predictive validity of psychological testing in law enforcement settings. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 26, 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simmers, K. D., Bowers, T. G., & Ruiz, J. M. (2003). Pre-employment psychological testing of police officers: The MMPI and the IPI as predictors of performance. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 5, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Task force report: The police. Washington, DC: USGPO.Google Scholar
  34. Travis, M. A. (1994). Psychological health tests for violence-prone police officers: Objectives, shortcomings, and alternatives. Stanford Law Review, 46(6), 1717–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wickersham Commission Reports. (1931). Report on the police, No. 14. Washington, DC: USGPO.Google Scholar
  36. Workowski, E. J., & Pallone, N. J. (1999). Previously unscored pre-service MMPI data in relation to police performance over a decade: A multivariate inquiry. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Albrecht
    • 1
  1. 1.Pace UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations