Advertisement

Social Structuration Online: Entropy and Social Systems

  • Sorin Adam Matei
  • Brian C. Britt
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)

Abstract

One of the most important goals of the present volume is to define and relate group structuration to other online organizational and interactional phenomena. Although structuration is a high-level concept that may hold different meanings for different people, within this research, the concept is quite simple and clear. In brief, structuration is equated with the concept of “signal” in information systems, as defined by Shannon and Weaver (1948). Structuration is meaningful order, so by Shannon’s logic, structure is the opposite of entropy. Since structure is measured using entropy, we may say that structure increases as the observed value of entropy decreases. Conceptually, this means that structure is captured in the negative by observing the degree to which the system is not random (noisy or disordered).

References

  1. de Alfaro L (2009) Text evolution and author contributions. https://goo.gl/IM7tQG. Accessed 28 Jan 2017
  2. de Alfaro L, Adler B, Pye I (2010) Computing wiki statistics (WikiTrust). http://wikitrust.soe.ucsc.edu/computing-wiki-statistics. Accessed 10 Sept 2012
  3. Andrews L (1865) A dictionary of the Hawaiian language, to which is appended an English-Hawaiian vocabulary and a chronological table of remarkable events. H. M. Whitney, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  4. Balch T (2000) Hierarchical social entropy: an information theoretic measure of robot group diversity. Auton Robot 8:209–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benkler Y (2006) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman J, Weitzer DJ (1997) Technology and democracy. Soc Res 64(3):1313–1319Google Scholar
  7. Braman S (1994) The autopoietic state: communication and democratic potential in the net. J Am Soc Inform Sci 45(6):358–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaffee S, Wilson DG (1977) Media-rich, media poor. Two studies of diversity in agenda-holding. Journal Q 54:466–476Google Scholar
  9. Cover TM, Thomas JA (2006) Elements of information theory. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham W (2005) Correspondence on the etymology of wiki. http://c2.com/doc/etymology.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2017
  11. Dominick JR, Pearce MC (1976) Trends in network prime-time programming, 1953–1974. J Commun 20:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodfellow M (2016) The 6 most controversial edited Wikipedia pages. Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/the-6-most-controversial-edited-wikipedia-pages-a6814756.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  13. Grossman LK (1995) The electronic republic: reshaping democracy in the information age. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hafner K (2006) Growing Wikipedia refines its “anyone can edit” policy. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/technology/17wiki.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  15. Hauben M (1996) Netizens: on the history and the impact of the net. http://www.columbia.edu/~hauben/netbook. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  16. Hiltz SR (1984) Online communities: a case study of the office of the future. Ablex, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  17. Hiltz SR, Turoff M (1978) The network nation: human communication via computer. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson S (2001) Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly K (1995) Out of control: the new biology of machines, social systems and the economic world. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiesler S, Sproull L (1992) Group decision making and communication technology. Organ Behav Hum Dec 52:96–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire T (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. Am Psychol 39(10):1123–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kittur A, Lee B, Kraut RE (2009) Coordination in collective intelligence: the role of team structure and task interdependence. In: Olsen DR Jr, Arthur RB, Hinckley K, Morris MR, Hudson S, Greenberg S (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2009). ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lemay P (1999) The statistical analysis of dynamics and complexity in psychology: a configurational approach. Dissertation, University of LausanneGoogle Scholar
  24. Leuf B, Cunningham W (2001) The Wiki way: quick collaboration on the web. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Licklider JCR, Taylor RW (1968) The computer as a communication device. Sci Technol: Tech Men Manag 76:21–31Google Scholar
  26. Lih A (2009) The Wikipedia revolution: how a bunch of nobodies created the world’s greatest encyclopedia. Hyperion, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Maignan C, Ottaviano G, Pinelli D, Rullani F (2003) Bio-ecological diversity vs. socio-economic diversity: a comparison of existing measures. Available via SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID389043_code030325590.pdf?abstractid=389043&mirid=1. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  28. Matei SA, Dobrescu C (2011) Wikipedia’s “neutral point of view”: settling conflict through ambiguity. Inform Soc 27(1):40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matei SA, Oh K, Bruno R (2010) Collaboration and communication in online environments: a social entropy approach. In: Oancea M (ed) Comunicare și comportament organizational (Communication and organizational behavior). Printech, Bucharest, pp 82–98Google Scholar
  30. McDonald DG, Dimmick J (2003) The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Commun Res 30:60–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Myers D (1987) Anonymity is part of the magic: individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication contexts. Qual Sociol 19(3):251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ortega F, Gonzalez-Barahona JM, Robles G (2008) On the inequality of contributions to Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS ‘08), IEEE, Washington, DC, 7–10 Jan 2008Google Scholar
  33. Osgood CE, Wilson KV (1961) Some terms and associated measures for talking about human communication. Urbana, Institute of Communications Research, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  34. Raymond ES (2001) The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary, Revised. O’Reilly, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Rheingold H (2000) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Rheingold H (2002) Smart mobs. Perseus Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanger L (2001) Wikipedia is wide open. Why is it growing so fast? Why isn’t it full of nonsense? Kuro5hin. http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2001/9/24/43858/2479. Accessed 1 Nov 2008
  38. Schramm W (1955) Information theory and mass communication. J Mass Comm 32(2):131–146Google Scholar
  39. Sclove R (1995) Democracy and technology. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Seife C (2007) Decoding the universe: how the new science of information is explaining everything in the cosmos, from our brains to black holes, Reprint. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Seigenthaler J (2005) A false Wikipedia ‘biography.’ USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  42. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1948) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanazbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw A, Hill BM (2014) Laboratories of oligarchy? How the Iron Law extends to peer production. J Commun 64(2):215–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sproull L, Kiesler SB (1991) Connections: new ways of working in the networked organization. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Stigler GJ (1983) The organization of industry. Richard D. Irwin, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  46. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations, 1st edn. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Turkle S (1995) Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Wikipedia (2008) Naina. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naina. Accessed 30 Oct 2008
  49. Wikipedia (2016a) Wikipedia. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia. Accessed 28 Oct 2016
  50. Wikipedia (2016b) Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view. Accessed 28 Oct 2016
  51. Wikipedia (2016c) Wikipedia:Statistics. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Statistics. Accessed 28 Oct 2016
  52. Wikipedia (2017a) Wikipedia:Most frequently edited pages. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Most_frequently_edited_pages. Accessed 2 Jan 2017
  53. Wikipedia (2017b) Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines. Accessed 29 Jan 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sorin Adam Matei
    • 1
  • Brian C. Britt
    • 2
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.South Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations