• Sorin Adam Matei
  • Brian C. Britt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)


If Wikipedia was a country and words its income, the wildly uneven distribution of wealth among its contributor-citizens would be unheard of. The wealth distribution of the USA, for instance, which some see as quite unfair, pales by comparison, as the top 1% of American earners account for “only” 15% of the national income compared to the 77% of content “owned” by the top 1% of Wikipedians (see Fig. 1.1). Our book explains why and how this uneven distribution matters. We believe that, far from being an abnormality, this inequality is a sign that Wikipedia has developed organically and naturally. The imbalance, in fact, shows that the site is structurally differentiated and that functional leaders have emerged, both processes that are essential for a healthy, functioning project. In this respect, the proverbial top 1% of contributors have a positive effect, as they anchor and serve as a contributing elite group with an important role in shaping the project.


  1. Alexa (2016) The top 500 sites on the web. Accessed 14 Oct 2016
  2. Arazy O, Nov O (2010) Determinants of Wikipedia quality: the roles of global and local contribution inequality. In: Inkpen K, Gutwin C, Tang J (eds) Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Arazy O, Ortega F, Nov O, Yeo L, Balila A (2015) Functional roles and career paths in Wikipedia. In: Cosley D, Forte A, Ciolfi L, McDonald D (eds) Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Arazy O, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Nov O, Daxenberger J, Balestra M, Cheshire C (2017) On the “how” and “why” of emergent role behaviors in Wikipedia. Paper presented at the 20th conference on computer-supported cooperative work and social computing (CSCW 2017), Portland, 25 Feb–1 Mar 2017Google Scholar
  5. Ayers P, Matthews C, Yates B (2008) How Wikipedia works: and how you can be a part of it. No Starch Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Bales RF (1950) Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups. Addison-Wesley Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Bales RF (1953) The equilibrium problem in small groups. In: Parsons T, Bales RF, Shils EA (eds) Working papers in the theory of action. Free Press, New York, pp 111–161Google Scholar
  8. Barabási A-L (2014) Linked: how everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Benkler Y (2006) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  10. Blau PM (1977) Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Brafman O, Beckstrom RA (2006) The starfish and the spider: the unstoppable power of leaderless organizations. Portfolio Trade, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Brandes U, Kenis P, Lerner J, van Raaij D (2009) Network analysis of collaboration structure in Wikipedia. In: Quemada J, Leon G, Maarek Y, Nejdl W (eds) Proceedings of the 18th international conference on the world wide web. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Britt BC (2013) Evolution and revolution of organizational configurations on Wikipedia: a longitudinal network analysis. Dissertation, Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016) American Time Use Survey. Accessed 13 Oct 2016
  15. Capocci A, Servedio VDP, Colaiori F, Buriol LS, Donato D, Leonardi S, Caldarelli G (2006) Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: the case of Wikipedia. Phys Rev E 74(3):036116. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cision, Bates D (2009) 2009 social media & online usage study. Accessed 19 Feb 2015
  17. Colón-Aguirre M, Fleming-May RA (2012) “You just type in what you are looking for”: undergraduates’ use of library resources vs. Wikipedia. J Acad Libr 38(6):391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Durkheim E (1893) De la division du travail social. Félix Alcan, Paris. English edition: Durkheim E (1960) The division of labor in society (trans: Simpson G). Free Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillmor D (2006) We the media: grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. O’Reilly Media, SebastopolGoogle Scholar
  21. Goode L (2009) Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media Soc 11:1287–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Head AJ, Eisenberg MB (2010) How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday 15(3). doi: 10.5210/fm.v15i3.2830.
  23. Huberman BA (2003) The laws of the web: patterns in the ecology of information. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. International Telecommunication Union (2016) ICT facts and figures 2016. Accessed 30 Jan 2017
  25. Javanmardi S, Ganjisaffar Y, Lopes C, Baldi P (2009) User contribution and trust in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on collaborative computing: Networking, applications and worksharing, IEEE, Washington, DC, 11–14 Nov 2009Google Scholar
  26. Kittur A, Kraut RE (2008) Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: quality through coordination. In: Begole B, McDonald DW (eds) Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Kittur A, Kraut RE (2010) Beyond Wikipedia: coordination and conflict in online production groups. In: Inkpen K, Gutwin C, Tang J (eds) Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kittur A, Chi EH, Pendleton BA, Suh B, Mytkowicz T (2007) Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. Paper presented at the 25th annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2007), San Jose, 28 Apr-3 May 2007Google Scholar
  29. Kittur A, Lee B, Kraut RE (2009a) Coordination in collective intelligence: the role of team structure and task interdependence. In: Olsen DR Jr, Arthur RB, Hinckley K, Morris MR, Hudson S, Greenberg S (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2009). ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Kittur A, Pendleton B, Kraut RE (2009b) Herding the cats: the influence of groups in coordinating peer production. In: Riehle D, Bruckman A (eds) WikiSym 2009: proceedings of the 5th annual symposium on wikis and open collaboration. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Konieczny P (2009) Governance, organization, and democracy on the internet: the iron law and the evolution of Wikipedia. Sociol Forum 24(1):162–192MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuk G (2006) Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Manag Sci 52(7):1031–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A (2006) Structure and evolution of online social networks. In: Eliassi-Rad T, Ungar L, Craven M, Gunopulos D (eds) Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Lih A (2009) The Wikipedia revolution: how a bunch of nobodies created the world’s greatest encyclopedia. Hyperion, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Matei SA, Bruno RJ (2014) Pareto’s 80/20 law and social differentiation: a social entropy perspective. Public Relat Rev 41(2):178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matei SA, Bertino E, Zhu M, Liu C, Si L, Britt BC (2015) A research agenda for the study of entropic social structural evolution, functional roles, adhocratic leadership styles, and credibility in online organizations and knowledge markets. In: Bertino E, Matei SA (eds) Roles, trust, and reputation in social media knowledge markets: theory and methods. Springer, New York, pp 3–33Google Scholar
  37. Miller M (2012) 3 more studies examine Wikipedia’s page 1 Google rankings. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  38. Mintzberg H (1979) The structuring of organizations: a synthesis of the research. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  39. Mintzberg H (1989) Mintzberg on management: inside our strategic world of organizations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Muchnik L, Pei S, Parra LC, Reis SDS, Andrade JS Jr, Havlin S, Makse HA (2013) Origins of power-law degree distribution in the heterogeneity of human activity in social networks. Sci Rep 3:1783. doi: 10.1038/srep01783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mullan E (2009) Information inaccuracy spells trouble for user-generated websites. EContent 32(3):10–11Google Scholar
  42. Newman M, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Nov O (2007) What motivates Wikipedians? Commun ACM 50(11):60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Sullivan MD (2009) Wikipedia: a new community of practice? Ashgate Publishing, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  45. Ortega F, Gonzalez-Barahona JM, Robles G (2008) On the inequality of contributions to Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS ‘08), IEEE, Washington, DC, 7–10 Jan 2008Google Scholar
  46. Oxford Reference (2009) A dictionary of the Internet. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
  47. Preece J, Shneiderman B (2009) The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans Hum-Comput Interact 1(1):13–32Google Scholar
  48. Segerberg A, Bennett WL (2011) Social media and the organization of collective action: using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. Commun Rev 14(3):197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaw D (2008) Wikipedia in the newsroom. Am Journal Rev 30(1):40–46Google Scholar
  50. Shirky C (2008) Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Shirky C (2010) Cognitive surplus: creativity and generosity in a connected age. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Silverwood-Cope S (2012) Wikipedia: page one of Google UK for 99% of searches. Accessed 20 Feb 2015
  53. Toffler A (1970) Future shock. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. U.S. Census Bureau (2014) Share of aggregate income received by each fifth and top 5 percent of households, all races: 1967 to 2013. Accessed 11 Feb 2015
  55. Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20:510–540Google Scholar
  56. Waterman RH Jr (1993) Adhocracy: the power to change. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang J, McAuley J, Leskovec J (2013) Community detection in networks with node attributes. Paper presented at the 13th IEEE international conference on data mining, Dallas, 7–10 Dec 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sorin Adam Matei
    • 1
  • Brian C. Britt
    • 2
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.South Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations