Skip to main content

Chapter 2 There Is No Escape: Constrained Tales of Sovereign Practice and Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prison Breaks

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

This chapter features analysis of two escape narratives, one an intimate, first-hand account of an escape from a UK prison and the other an account based on a public enquiry into a mass escape from a prison in Sierra Leone, West Africa. The analysis shows how escapes are a feature of imprisonment through which sovereign power, authority and legitimacy are contested, claimed and performed, and implies that more attention to sovereign relations would be a useful supplement to recent theorizing on sovereign practice. Sovereignty, the tales affirm, is not given but negotiated. Both tales illustrate the contingency of sovereignty and the way it is always an effect of social practice and relations rather than an expression of will.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, I have no first- or second-hand knowledge of the state of mind of the drafter of the enquiry’s report. Thus, I confess to having allowed myself a degree of poetic licence in the latter part of this vignette.

  2. 2.

    For an important discussion of procedural justice along similar lines see Bottoms and Tankebe.

  3. 3.

    For more on the prison as agentic, see Jefferson and Gaborit (2015) and Armstrong (under review).

  4. 4.

    In his obituary of Michel Foucault, Edward Said utilizes the evocative phrase ‘fugitive energies’ to capture something of what Foucault believed made up ‘human or even institutional performances in the process of taking place ’ (cited by Cohen and Taylor 1992: 28). Cohen and Taylor recommend that further attention be paid to this notion but they do not elaborate. I would second this but neither time nor space has allowed me to do so within the confines of this chapter.

  5. 5.

    Other scholarship attentive to the everydayness of the tragic that has inspired me includes Berlant 2010; Buch Segal 2014, 2016; Das 2007; Povinelli 2009, 2011; and Stevenson 2014.

  6. 6.

    Recent work on ethnographic sensibility (e.g., Schatz 2009; Shore et al. 2011; Stepputat and Larsen 2015) has pointed to the potential of immersion in the meanings and significance of policies and texts in similar interpretive fashion as ethnographers immerse themselves in sites populated by people. This is what I attempt here.

  7. 7.

    These were the Office of the Ombudsman, Ministry of Internal Affairs , Office of National Security, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Justice Sector Coordination Office, Law Officers Department, Sierra Leone Police and the civil society organization Prison Watch. This initiative should come as no real surprise. Following escapes, establishing a committee of investigation is a standard reflex of the state as it seeks to find fault, re-establish control and avoid repetition.

  8. 8.

    These reviews are cursory, consisting only of an annotated list of previous reports with very little information about their substance. They cover a broad time span including a report on the results of a general enquiry into operations and facilities from 1989, a proposal for reform and restructuring from 2008, a report on an escape from the law courts in 2004, a report on a riot and the smuggling of contraband from 2009, a report on the state of prison security from 2001, and a UNDP-sponsored report on security in the light of human rights , as well as the correctional services act 2010 and the prison rules 1961.

  9. 9.

    The Standard Times. Accessible via http: www.standardtimespress.org/artman/publish/artcile_5097.shtml. Accessed 12-08-2016.

  10. 10.

    See Jefferson and Gaborit 2015; Armstrong and Jefferson 2017.

References

  • Armstrong, S. (Under review). Prison Leviathan: Prison as Stage and Actor. Crime Media Culture, manuscript on file with the authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, S., & Jefferson, A. M. (2017). Disavowing ‘the’ Prison. In D. Moran & A. Schliehe (Eds.), Carceral Spatiality Dialogues Between Geography and Criminology. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, M. (2010). Everyday Life in a Prison: Confinement, Surveillance, Resistance. New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2010). Cruel Optimism. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The Affect Theory Reader. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch Segal, L. (2014). Disembodied Conjugality. In R. Chatterji (Ed.), Wording the World. Veena Das and the Scenes of Inheritance. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch Segal, L. (2016). No Place for Grief. Martyrs, Mourning and Prisoners in Contemporary Palestine. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, C., Utas, M., & Vigh, H. (2006). Navigating Youth, Generating Adulthood; Social Becoming in an African Context. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Taylor, L. (1992). Escape Attempts the Theory and Practice of Resistance in Everyday Life. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, V. (2007). Life and words. Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). A Thousand Plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). London/New York: Continuum (2004). Capitalism and Schizophrenia, vol. 2, 1972–1980. Trans of Mille Plateaux. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., & Stepputat, F. (2001). States of Imagination. Ethnographic Explorations of the Post Colonial State. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., & Stepputat, F. (2005). Sovereign Bodies. Citizens, Migrants and States in the Post Colonial World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. (2012). Conceptualizing Confinement: Prisons and Poverty in Sierra Leone. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14, 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. (2014a). Performances of Victimhood, Allegation and Disavowal in Sierra Leone. In S. Jensen & H. Ronsbo (Eds.), Histories of Victimhood (pp. 218–238). Philadelphia: Penn University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. (2014b). The Situated Production of Legitimacy: Perspectives from the Global South. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. An International Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. (2017). Exacerbating Deprivation: Trajectories of Confinement in Sierra Leone. In R. Armstrong & I. Durnescu (Eds.), Parole and Beyond: International Experiences of Life After Prison. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M., & Gaborit, L. S. (2015). Human Rights in Prisons: Comparing Institutional Encounters in Kosovo, Sierra Leone and the Philippines. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, K. (1988). Prison Officers and Their World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. D. (2008). Prison Staff: An International Perspective. In J. Bennett, B. Crewe, & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Understanding Prison Staff. Cullompton/Portland: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in Critical Ethnographic Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, E. (2009). The Child in the Broom Closet. States of Killing and Letting Die. In A. Sarat & J. L. Culbert (Eds.), States of Violence: War, Capital Punishment, and Letting Die. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, E. (2011). Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, E. (Ed.). (2009). Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power (1st ed.). Chicago/London: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., Wright, S., & Per, D. (Eds.). (2011). Policy Worlds: Anthropology and Analysis of Contemporary Power (Vol. 14). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Bottoms, A., & Hay, W. (1996). Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford/New York: OUP Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stepputat, F. (2013). Contemporary Governscapes: Sovereign Practice and Hybrid Orders Beyond the Center. In M. Bouziane, C. Harders, & A. Hoffmann (Eds.), Local Politics and Contemporary Transformations in the Arab World: Governance Beyond the Center (pp. 25–42). Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepputat, F. (2014). Governing the Dead Sovereignty and the Politics of Dead Bodies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepputat, F., & Larsen, J. (2015). Global Political Ethnography: A Methodological Approach to Studying Global Policy Regimes (DIIS Working Paper 2015:01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. (2014). Life Beside Itself. Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. (2000). An Introduction to African Politics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Utas, M. (2012). Introduction: Bigmanity and Network Governance in Africa. In M. Utas (Ed.), African Conflicts and Informal Power: Big Men and Networks. London: Zed books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jefferson, A.M. (2018). Chapter 2 There Is No Escape: Constrained Tales of Sovereign Practice and Relations. In: Martin, T., Chantraine, G. (eds) Prison Breaks. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64358-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64358-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64357-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64358-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics