Spatial Learning of Novice Engineering Students Through Practice of Interaction with Robot-Manipulators

  • Igor VernerEmail author
  • Sergei Gamer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 22)


This paper presents a study in which learning interactions of novice engineering students with robot manipulators focus on training spatial skills. To support the interactions, we customized the robots’ workspaces, designed virtual robotic cells, and developed robot manipulation tasks with oriented blocks. 20 high school students (HSS) majoring in mechanics and 248 Technion first-year students (TS) participated. The study indicated that following the training, the HSS improved their performance of spatial tests, and the TS gained awareness of spatial skills required to handle industrial robot systems.



This study is supported by the Israel Science Foundation. We appreciate help of Technion and school instructors: Dr. Assaf Avrahami, Niv Krayner, Elena Baskin and Ronny Magril.


  1. 1.
    Munro, D.: Development of an automated manufacturing course with lab for undergraduates. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 496–501 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bien, Z.Z., Lee, H.-E.: Effective learning system techniques for human–robot interaction in service environment. Knowl.-Based Syst. 20(5), 439–456 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang, G.A., Stone, W.L.: An effective learning approach for industrial robot programming. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, US (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma, J., Nickerson, J.V.: Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: a comparative literature review. ACM Comput. Surv. 38(3), 1–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldstain, O., Ben-Gal, I., Bukchin, Y.: Evaluation of telerobotic interface components for teaching robot operation. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4(4), 365–376 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shin, D., Wysk, R.A., Rothrock, L.: A formal control-theoretic model of human-automation interactive manufacturing system control. Int. J. Prod. Res. 44(20), 4273–4295 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lathan, C.E., Tracey, M.: The effects of operator spatial perception and sensory feedback on human-robot teleoperation performance. Presence 11(4), 368–377 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menchaca-Brandan, M.A., Liu, A.M., Oman, C.M., Natapoff, A.: Influence of perspective-taking and mental rotation abilities in space teleoperation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 271–278. ACM (2007) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stanney, K.M., Cohn, J., Milham, L., Hale, K., Darken, R., Sullivan, J.: Deriving training strategies for spatial knowledge acquisition from behavioral, cognitive, and neural foundations. Mil. Psychol. 25(3), 191–205 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Intelitek: RoboCell for Controller USB. Accessed 22 Mar 2015
  11. 11.
    Uttal, D.H., Meadow, N.G., Tipton, E., Hand, L.L., Alden, A.R., Warren, C., Newcombe, N.S.: The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol. Bull. 139(2), 352–402 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verner, M.: Robot manipulations: a synergy of visualization, computation and action for spatial instruction. Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn. 9(2), 213–234 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bower, G.: Awareness, the unconscious, and repression: an experimental psychologist’s perspective. In: Singer, J. (ed.) Repression and Dissociation, pp. 209–231. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eliot, J., Smith, I.: An International Directory of Spatial Tests. NFER-Nelson, Atlantic Highlands (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations