Integrated Complex for IoT Technologies Study

  • Anzhelika ParkhomenkoEmail author
  • Artem Tulenkov
  • Aleksandr Sokolyanskii
  • Yaroslav Zalyubovskiy
  • Andriy Parkhomenko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 22)


As known, Internet today is not only environment of communication and information exchange between people, but it is a tool and technology of interaction between customers, “things” and devices. Therefore, industry wants effectively design, create and deploy modern smart connected products and need the relevant professionals with a wide breath of knowledge and skills from business intelligence, hardware engineering, information security and Internet of Things (IoT). Integration of IoT study into curriculum is an actual task, because gives real possibilities to enhance students’ competitiveness in a rapidly changing labor market.

The purpose of this work is realization of practical-oriented approaches and methods in educational process of future IT-professionals based on REIoT complex - Smart House&IoT lab integrated with remote lab RELDES. Complex based on platforms Arduino, Raspberry Pi and OpenHAB. OpenHAB REST API has been used for integration remote lab RELDES with Smart House&IoT lab. This allows get remote access to Smart House&IoT lab experiments and their states as well as status updates or sending of commands for experiments.

REIoT complex application in educational process gives students all advantages of remote experiments and possibilities of different IoT platforms, sensors, actuators, protocols, interfaces practical study.


Internet of Things Remote laboratory Embedded Systems Smart House Practically-oriented teaching methods 


  1. 1.
    What is the Internet of Things, IoT (in Russian).
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Porter, M., Heppelmann, J.: How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard in Business Review Articles.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Chung, J.-M.: Internet of Things & Augmented Reality Emerging Technologies (in Russian).
  6. 6.
    Purpose-built for the Internet of Things.
  7. 7.
    Internet of Things Institute Learning Center.
  8. 8.
    Internet of Things Roadmap to a Connected World.
  9. 9.
    IEEE Internet of Things Webinars.
  10. 10.
    Vermesan, O., Friess, P.: Internet of Things - From Research and Innovation to Market Deployment. River Publishers, Aalborg (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qiu, F.: Overall framework design of an intelligent dynamic accounting information platform based on the Internet of Things. iJOE 12(5), 14–16 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cai, K., Tie, F., Huang, H., Lin, H., Chen, H.: Innovative experimental platform design and teaching application of the Internet of Things. iJOE 11(6), 28–32 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stage 1 - Introduction to the Internet of Things: What, Why and How.
  14. 14.
    Tabunshchyk, G., Parkhomenko, A.: New technologies in the training of embedded systems’ specialists. In: International Scientific Conference on Internet-Education-Science, pp. 248–250. VNTU, Vinnitsa, Ukraine (2014) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prytula, A., Tabunshchyk, G., Parkhomenko, A.: Practically oriented teaching methods in the field of embedded systems. In: VII International Scientific Conference on Current Problems and Achievements in the Field of Radio, Telecommunications and Information Technology, pp. 216–218. ZNTU, Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine (2014) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Parkhomenko, A., Gladkova, O., Kurson, S., Sokolyanskii, A., Ivanov, E.: Internet-based technologies for design of embedded systems. J. Control Sci. Eng. 13(2), 55–63 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parkhomenko, A., Gladkova, O., Ivanov, E., Sokolyanskii, A., Kurson, S.: Development and application of remote laboratory for embedded systems design. iJOE 11(3), 27–31 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Tabunshchyk, G., Van Merode, D., Arras, P., Henke, K.: Remote experiments for reliability studies of embedded systems. In: International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, Madrid, Spain, pp. 68–71 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poliakov, M., Larionova, T., Tabunshchyk, G., Parkhomenko, A., Henke, K.: Hybrid models of studied objects using remote laboratories for teaching design of control systems. iJOE 12(09), 7–13 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gilibert, M., Picazo, J., Auer, M., Pester, A., Cusidó, J., Ortega, J.: 80C537 microcontroller remote lab for e-learning teaching. iJOE 2(4), 1–3 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guerra, H., Cardoso, A., Sousa, V., Gomes, L.: Remote experiments as an asset for learning programming in python. iJOE 12(4), 71–73 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ozvoldová, M., Ondrusek, P.: Integration of online labs into educational systems. iJOE 11(6), 54–59 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wuttke, H.-D., Ubar, R., Henke, K.: Remote and virtual laboratories in problem-based learning scenarios. In: IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, Taichung, Taiwan, pp. 377–382 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cvjetkovic, V., Matijevic, M.: Overview of architectures with Arduino boards as building blocks for data acquisition and control systems. iJOE 12(7), 10–17 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anzhelika Parkhomenko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Artem Tulenkov
    • 1
  • Aleksandr Sokolyanskii
    • 1
  • Yaroslav Zalyubovskiy
    • 1
  • Andriy Parkhomenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Zaporizhzhya National Technical UniversityZaporizhzhyaUkraine

Personalised recommendations