Advertisement

Self-Sensing Behavior Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loadings of ECC Containing Electrically Conductive Carbon-Based Materials

  • Mustafa Şahmaran
  • Ali Al-Dahawi
  • Vadood Farzaneh
  • Oğuzhan Öcal
  • Gürkan Yıldırım
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)

Abstract

The development of self-sensing (piezoresistivity) feature which is one of the non-structural properties of cementitious composites to be multifunctional is under focus in the present study. This capability is considered as one of the best alternatives to continuously monitor the damage and deformations of infrastructures. The self-sensing behavior of cubic and prismatic specimens under monotonic uniaxial compression and cyclic flexural loadings respectively was investigated and compared with dielectric ECC materials. The results showed that the incorporation of carbon-based electrically conductive materials within the cementitious composites have a significant effect on monitoring the damage and deformation of cement-based materials effectively.

Keywords

Self-sensing Carbon-based materials Multifunctional cementitious composites (MCC) Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the Scientific and Technical Research Council (TUBITAK) of Turkey provided under Project: 114R043.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen P-W, Chung D (1993) Carbon fiber reinforced concrete as an electrical contact material for smart structures. Smart Mater Struct 2(3):181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung DDL (2002) Piezoresistive cement-based materials for strain sensing. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 13(9):599–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hou T-C, Lynch JP (2005) Conductivity-based strain monitoring and damage characterization of fiber reinforced cementitious structural components. In: Proceedings of SPIE 12th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials, March 6–10. 2005. International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Diego, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azhari F (2009) Cement-based sensors for structural health monitoring, in civil engineering. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, p 184Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ou J, Han B (2009) Piezoresistive cement-based strain sensors and self-sensing concrete components. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 20:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EN-197-1 (2000) Cement-part I: COMPOSITION, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, in European Standard, p 29Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASTM-C150 (2007) Standard specification for Portland cement, in Annual book of ASTM standards, p 8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASTM-C618 (2005) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete, in Annual book of ASTM standards, p 3Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ASTM-C494/C494M (1999) Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete, in Annual book of ASTM standards, p 9Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li VC, Wang S, Wu C (2001) Tensile strain-hardening behavior of polyvinyl alcohol engineered cementitious composite (PVA-ECC). Mater J 98(6):483–492Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASTM-C204 (2007) Standard test methods for fineness of hydraulic cement by air-permeability apparatus, in Annual book of ASTM standards, p 9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60(2):309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Al-Dahawi A, Öztürk O, Emami F, Yıldırım G, Şahmaran M (2016) Effect of mixing methods on the electrical properties of cementitious composites incorporating different carbon-based materials. Constr Build Mater 104:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun M-Q, Liew RJ, Zhang M-H, Li W (2014) Development of cement-based strain sensor for health monitoring of ultra high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 65:630–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li H, Ou J, Xiao H, Guan X, Han B (2011) Nanomaterials-enabled multifunctional concrete and structures, in Nanotechnology in civil infrastructure: a paradigm shift. In: Gopalakrishnan K, et al (eds) Springer, Berlin, pp 131–173Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al-Dahawi A, Sarwary MH, Öztürk O, Yıldırım G, Akın A, Şahmaran M, Lachemi M (2016) Electrical percolation threshold of cementitious composites possessing self-sensing functionality incorporating different carbon-based materials. Smart Mater Struct 25(10):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kendall A, Keoleian GA, Lepech MD (2007) Materials design for sustainability through life cycle modeling of engineered cementitious composites. Mater Struct 41(6):1117–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Şahmaran M, Li VC (2007) De-icing salt scaling resistance of mechanically loaded engineered cementitious composites. Cem Concr Res 37(7):1035–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Şahmaran M, Li VC (2008) Durability of mechanically loaded engineered cementitious composites under highly alkaline environments. Cement Concr Compos 30(2):72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li VC, Şahmaran M (2010) Engineered cementitious composites. Transportation research record. J Transp Res Board 2164(1):1–8Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Şahmaran M, Lachemi M, Hossain KMA, Li VC (2009) Internal curing of engineered cementitious composites for prevention of early age autogenous shrinkage cracking. Cem Concr Res 39(10):893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Şahmaran M, Özbay E, Yücel HE, Lachemi M, Li VC (2011) Effect of fly ash and PVA fiber on microstructural damage and residual properties of engineered cementitious composites exposed to high temperatures. J Mater Civ Eng 23(12):1735–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sahmaran M, Yücel HE, Yildirim G, Al-Emam M, Lachemi M (2014) Investigation of the bond between concrete substrate and ECC overlays. J Mater Civ Eng 26(1):167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yucel HE, Guler M, Jashami H, Yaman IO, Sahmaran M (2013) Thin ECC overlay systems for rehabilitation of rigid concrete pavements. Mag Concr Res 65(2):108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li-Ping G, Wei S, Qing-Yu C (2010) Multiscale material design and crack path prediction of a polymer-modified cementitious cover layer. Comput Mater Sci 49(1):184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM-C109/C109M (2005) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens), in Annual book of ASTM standards, p 9Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reza F, Batson GB, Yamamuro JA, Lee JS (2001) Volume electrical resistivity of carbon fiber cement composites. ACI Mater J 98(1):25–35Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Şahmaran
    • 1
  • Ali Al-Dahawi
    • 2
  • Vadood Farzaneh
    • 1
  • Oğuzhan Öcal
    • 1
  • Gürkan Yıldırım
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering FacultyHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Building and Construction EngineeringUniversity of TechnologyBaghdadIraq
  3. 3.Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering FacultyAdana Science and Technology UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations