Key Success Factors Impacting the Success of Innovation in UAE Construction Projects

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)

Abstract

Purpose Several Former researches has been concerned with the Innovation concept, however, to the extent of authors knowledge, there are less literature concerned the application of Innovation concept in construction projects in United Arab of Emirates, with a clear identification of the exact role of each member of the participants in UAE innovation process, The purpose of this research is to investigate and identify the critical factors which influence and enable innovation in UAE construction projects. Also, identify responsible party for each factor application. Design/methodology/approach The research took form of qualitative approach first, which rely on critical analysis of relevant literatures focused on innovation in construction projects and similar industries, either in UAE or similar Contexts, which have been found to be applicable in UAE construction projects, aiming to identify the critical factors influencing the innovation in construction industry in UAE, and extend the research to classify the ownership of each factor among all parties involved in the process. Then, the findings have been examined using the quantitative approach though a designed survey to validate the finding and measure the Impact of each factor on the success of UAE innovative construction projects, as well as the correlation and regression between the different identified factors with each other. Findings According to the study results, three major players has been identified as a main influencer to the innovation process in UAE construction project which are: Government, R&D institutions & organizations. Also a set of ten factors categories has been identified as a critical for innovation success which are: Support of R&D investment, Commitment, Vision & Policies, advanced procurement systems, Leadership style, market oriented researches, Flexibility of experts’ movement, knowledge exchange, In-house testing facilities and Decentralized university system. Application of those ten factors categories found to be different base on the scope of each player of the three key players which resulted into thirty key success factors for innovation in UAE construction projects. Furthermore, the study identified the impact strength of each factors in order to identify the scope of each key player to focus and involve as a form of scope matrix. Also, types of innovation has been identified as the “technical innovation” and “organizational innovation”, the study result suggest that both of them required to be developed simultaneously in order to deliver the targeted “successful innovation in UAE construction project” Research limitations/implications The identified factors are considered as a main factors but not an all-inclusive list, further research may add more factors which might be directly or indirectly impact the innovation in UAE construction projects. Practical implications The concluded list of critical factors influencing the innovation in UAE construction projects with its scope demarcation matrix will help the major players involved in innovation process to recognize the contribution expected from each, and then can be considered as a base for any socio-economic initiatives can be introduced in present of near future to support the process of innovation in UAE construction projects. Originality/value The study generate its value through integration of partial knowledge gained by previous various study into a comprehensive focused analysis on the innovation in construction projects in the country of UAE, which to extent of authors knowledge, never been discussed that precisely before.

Keywords

Innovation Construction UAE Vision & policies R&D investment 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. 1.
    Neaime S (2012) The global financial crisis, financial linkages and correlations in returns and volatilities in emerging MENA stock markets. Emerg Mark Rev 13(3):268–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Erogul M (2013) Entrepreneurial activity and attitude in the United Arab Emirates. Innov Manag Policy Pract 2159–2186Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schilirò D (2015) Innovation in small and medium enterprises in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Soc Sci Stud 3(5)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozorhon B (2013) Analysis of construction innovation process at project level. J Manag Eng 29(4):455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ozorhon B, Abbott C, Aouad G (2014) Integration and leadership as enablers of innovation in construction: a case study. J Manag Eng 30(2):256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Widén K, Olander S, Atkin B (2013). Links between successful innovation diffusion and stakeholder engagement. J Manag EngGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu H et al (2014) Identification of critical success factors for construction innovation: from the perspective of strategic cooperation. Front Eng 1(2):202–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li BC (2010) Engineering innovation: break through the barriers and avoid the traps. Zhejiang University Press, HangzhouGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang MJ, Zhang ZS (2011). Analyse of the formation and operation mechanism for technological innovation network of major construction projects. Chin Eng SciGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hacklin F, Battistini B, Von-Krogh G (2013) Strategic choices in converging industries. MITSloan Manag Rev 55(1):64–73Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwab K (ed) (2013) The global competitiveness report 2013–2014: Full data edition, Geneva, World Economic ForumGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schiliro D (2013) Diversification and development of the United Arab Emirates’economy. J Appl Econ Sci (JAES) 2(24):228–239Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    El-Sokari H, Van Horne C, Huang Z, Al-Awad M (2013) Entrepreneurship. An Emirati Perspective, Abu Dhabi, Khalifa Fund for Enterprise Development & Zayed UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Jundi S (2012) Economic diversification in the United Arab Emirates = التنويع الاقتصادي في الإمارات العربية المتحدة. آفاق اقتصادية, 33(122): 9–37Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suliman A (2013) Organizational justice and innovation in the workplace: the case of the UAE. J Manage Dev 32(9):945–959Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blayse AM, Manley K (2004) Key influences on construction innovation. Constr Innov Inf Process Manag 4(3):143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abbot C, Jeong K, Allen S (2006) The economic motivation for innovation in small construction companies. Constr Innov Inf Process Manag 6(3):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kagioglou M, Cooper R, Aouad G, Sexton M (2000). Rethinking construction: the generic design and construction process protocol. Eng Constr Archit Manag 7(2):141–153Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abbot-Smith K, Behrens H (2006) How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: the german passive and future constructions. Cogn Sci 30(6):995–1026Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alinaitwe HM, Widén K, Mwakali J, Hansson B (2007) Innovation barriers and enablers that affect productivity in Uganda building industry. J Constr Dev Ctries 12(1):59–75Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bygballe L, Ingemansson M (2014) The logic of innovation in construction. Ind Mark Manag 43(3):512–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blayse A, Manley K (2004) Key influences on construction innovation. Constr Innov Inf Process Manag 4(3):143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aouad G, Ozorhon B, Abbott C (2010) Facilitating innovation in construction: Directions and implications for research and policy. Constr Innov Inf Process Manag 10(4):374–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manley K (2008) Implementation of innovation by manufacturers subcontracting to construction projects. Eng Constr Archit Manag 15(3):230–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muscio A, Quaglione D, Vallanti G (2013) Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Res Policy 42(1):63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mollaoglu-Korkmaz S, Swarup L, Riley D (2013) Delivering sustainable, high-performance buildings: influence of project delivery methods on integration and project outcomes. J Manage Eng 29(1):71–78Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dainty A, Millett S, Briscoe G (2001) New perspectives on construction supply chain integration. Supply Chain Manag Int J 6(4):163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rahman M, Kumaraswamy M, Ling F (2007) Building a relational contracting culture and integrated teams. Can J Civ Eng 34(1):75–88Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miniaoui H, Schilirò D (2017) Innovation and entrepreneurship for the diversification and growth of the gulf cooperation council economies. Bus Manage Stud 3(3):69Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abuelmaatti A, Ahmed V (2014) Collaborative technologies for small and medium-sized architecture, engineering and construction enterprises: implementation survey. J Inf Technol Constr 19:210–224Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Akintoye A, Goulding J, Zawdie G (2012) Construction innovation and process improvement. Wiley-Blackwell, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Albaloushi H, Skitmore M (2008) Supply chain management in the UAE construction industry. Int J Constr Manag 8(1):53–71Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rousseau V, Aubé C, Tremblay S (2013) Team coaching and innovation in work teams. Leadersh Organ Dev J 34(4):344–364Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bass B, Avolio B, Jung D, Berson Y (2003) Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol 88(2):207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yukl G (1999) An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Q 10(2):285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pieterse A, van Knippenberg D, Schippers M, Stam D (2009) Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31(4):609–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alam MM (2014) Market orientation and innovation: are they related concepts? Int J Trends Econ Manag Technol (IJTEMT), 3(6)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Al-Abd Y, Mezher T, Al-Saleh Y (2012). Toward building a national innovation system in UAE. In: 2012 Proceedings of PICMET’12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies. IEEE, pp. 2086–2099Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Randeree K (2014) Organisational justice: migrant worker perceptions in organisations in the United Arab Emirates. J Bus Syst Gov Ethics 3(4):59–69Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Motaleb O, Kishk M (2013) An investigation into the risk of construction projects delays in the UAE. Int J Inf Technol Proj Manag 4(3):50–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Madichie N (2011) IRENA—Masdar City (UAE)—exemplars of innovation into emerging markets. Foresight 13(6):34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Castellani D, Jimenez A, Zanfei A (2013) How remote are R&D labs? Distance factors and international innovative activities. J Int Bus Stud 44(7):649–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Al Hallami MO, Van Horne C, Huang VZ (2013) Technological innovation in the United Arab Emirates: process and challenges. Transnatl Corp Rev 5(2):46–59Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pamuk H, Bulte E, Adekunle AA (2014) Do decentralized innovation systems promote agricultural technology adoption? Experimental evidence from Africa. Food Policy 44:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Baruch Y (1999) Response rate in academic studies-a comparative analysis. Hum Relat 52(4):421–438Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Norusis MJ (1992) SPSS for windows: advanced statistics release 5. SPSS Incorporated, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cattell R (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1(2):245–276Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thurstone L (1947) The calibration of test items. Am Psychol 2(3):103–104Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Norušis M (2006) SPSS 15.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BUiDDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations