Skip to main content

Assesment of Historical Kars Stone Bridge in Terms of Sustainability of Historical Heritage

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017) (ISBS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 7))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Due to its geographical location, Anatolian lands which was home to many various civilizations in centuries, when examined in terms of Turkish history, includes many historical structures in the term from ancient ages until our day. Protecting historical structures is an inevitable input in terms of; continuity of functionality; development of the society and cities and improvement. Besides housing which is the most basic need, bridges connecting the two sides of lands in order to provide transportation and communication requirements, have an important place in terms of cultural heritage. While most bridges in Anatolia managed to stay alive over time, most of the took severed damages and even came to the point of destruction due to intense natural hazards like earthquakes, floods, wars and many other more external factors. Everyone is responsible for ensuring the protection, livelihood and sustainability of these structures, which are common to all people. The sustainability concept exploring the harmony/ balance between the preservation and use of historical and cultural assets was discussed in Taşköprü (Karahanoğlu Bridge), which connects the northern side to the south side in the center of Kars. The arched stone bridge belonging to the Ottoman period is a rare cultural asset of the city. Within the scope of the study, the repairs, the interventions and the current situation of the historical stone bridge were examined. In order to ensure the preservation of the building and the continuity of its function, the evaluation of the historical touch around the bridge, the continuity of the surrounding green areas, and the transfer of the bridge to the future are emphasized. As a result, this work will be a source for both the building itself and other buildings with similar characteristics, contributing to the preservation of the historical heritage and its transfer to future generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yeşilbaş E (2007) Diyarbakır’da Su Mimarisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sanat Tarihi Bilim Dalı, Konya

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atak E (2008) Erken Osmanlı Köprüler. Çanakkale On Sekiz Mart Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sanat Tarihi Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çanakkale

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ekinci O (2006) Kars Kitabı. Anahtar Kitaplar, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bingöl A (2011) Kars Ve Çevresinde Demir Çağı Yerleşmeleri. J Institute Soc Sci 8:20–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Terzi SG (2013) Kars İli Tarihi Taş Köprüsü As-Built Raporu. T.C. Ulaştırma Bakanlığı, Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  6. Akçayöz V, Öztürkkan Y (2010) Eski Yeni Fotoğraflarla Kars An Ilustrated Story. Kars Kültür ve Sanat Derneği, Kars

    Google Scholar 

  7. Özkök MK, Azsöz G, Erşan Ş (2015) Erken Ve Klasik Dönem (14.-17. Yy) Osmanlı Köprülerinin Tarihsel Gelişimlerinin Ve Yapım Tekniklerinin İncelenmesi: Edirne/ Uzunköprü Örneği, 3.Köprüler Viyadükler Sempozyumu, İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası, Bursa Şubesi, Mayıs

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cook J, Özkeresteci V (2001) Ekolojinin Mimarisi. Domus M Dergisi 10:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996) Socioeconomik equity, sustainability and earth’s carrying capacity. Ecol Appl 6(4):991–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beyhan SG (2004) Kültürel Süreklilik ve Çağdaş Gereksinmeler Bağlamında Sürdürülebilir Turizm ve Kimlik Kavramsal Modeli: Pamukkale Modeli. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  11. Özlüer F (2007) Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmanın Ekonomik Politigi [Elektronik Hali]. Mimarlar Odası Ankara Subesi Bülten 51, Dosya 05, Sürdürülebilirlik: Kent Ve Mimarlık

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tarihi Köprüler, T.C. Ulaştırma Bakanlığı, Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü, Köprüler Dairesi Başkanlığı, Tarihi Köprüler Şubesi, Müdürlüğü, Ankara 2009

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baysan O (2003) Sürdürülebilirlik Kavramı Ve Mimarlıkta Tasarıma Yansıması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İ.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, s.11–18–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Web; Doğanay, H., “Kars’ın turizm potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesi” http://www.karskulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,54935/karsin-turizm-potansiyelinin-degerlendirilmesi.html. Last Accessed 14 Dec 2016

  15. Web; Kars Provincial Directorate of Culture and Tourism, “Hamamlar” http://www.karskulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,54875/hamamlar.html. Last accessed 14 Dec 2016

  16. Akçayöz V, Öztürkkan Y (2010) Eski Yeni Fotoğraflarla Kars With Old And New Pictures. Kars Kültür ve Sanat Derneği, Kars

    Google Scholar 

  17. Büyükoksal T (2012) Kentsel Korumanın Sürdürülebilirliğinin Olabilirliliği Üzerine Bir Yaklasım Önerisi Eskişehir Odunpazarı Örneği, Uzmanlık Tezi. T.C. Kültür Ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları Ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sey Y. SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA/ “TARİHİ KÜLTÜREL MİRASIN KORUNMASI”, VİZYON 2023 ÖNGÖRÜ PANELLERİ

    Google Scholar 

  19. Göksal T (2003) Mimaride Sürdürülebilirlik Teknoloji İlişkisi: Güneş Pili uygulamaları. Arredamento Mimarlık Dergisi, S.154, s.76–79

    Google Scholar 

  20. Özcan Z (2002) Cultural heritage and urban sustainability: a case study from Central Anatolia, the sustainable City II, Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, sayfa, Segovia-Spain, pp 377–386

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yenişehirlioğlu F (2002) Türkiyede Tarihi Kent Dokularının Korunması Ve Geleceğe Güvenle Taşınması Sempozyumu. T.C Kültür Bakalığı Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Genel Müdürlüğü, Kemer, Antalya

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tanyeli G (2002) Türkiye Köprüleri, Türkler (Cilt 12). Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elif Tektas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tektas, E., İlerisoy, Z.Y., Tuna, M.E. (2018). Assesment of Historical Kars Stone Bridge in Terms of Sustainability of Historical Heritage. In: Fırat, S., Kinuthia, J., Abu-Tair, A. (eds) Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017). ISBS 2017. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64349-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64349-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64348-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64349-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics