Advertisement

Sustainable Architecture Under the Timeline Frame: Case Study of Fujairah in UAE

  • Tahani Yousuf
  • Hanan Taleb
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)

Abstract

There is a significant link between thermal comfort and energy performance, since creating comfortable temperatures requires thermal energy. The tighter the tolerances of temperature demanded the more energy consumed. It is therefore important to understand the implications of relaxing those tolerances and what passive strategies are available as alternatives to mechanical temperature control. This study attempts to investigate the impact of passive environmental strategies on built form using a simulation of an existing residential building. The house is located in Al Bithna/Fujairah. The simulation was conducted using IES-VE software. The results show a reduction and savings when implementing different passive strategies. This begins with increasing window size and is followed by changing glazing type and finally adding a shading device to the base model. The aim of this study is to understand sustainability evolution in residential houses in the UAE across different time frames. The document will delve in the past to check the characteristics of old houses in the UAE and their attempts to maintain comfort and sustainability. Turning to the present, a case study is selected to which different passive design strategies are applied and a recommendation of what the future will look like in terms of sustainable residential houses is developed. The study concludes with a look at the impact of combined strategies to see the impact of different variables such as average day lighting, solar gain and cooling sensible load.

Keywords

Passive design Arid Design strategies Timeline UAE IES 

References

  1. 1.
    Alzoubi H, Al-Zoubi A (2009) Assessment of building façade performance in terms of daylighting and the associated energy consumption in architectural spaces: vertical and horizontal shading devices for southern exposure facades. Energy Convers Manag 51(2010):1592–1599Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Institute of Architecture (AIA) (2008) Environmental study. Available from: http://www.aia.org
  3. 3.
    Bessoudo M et al (2010) Indoor thermal environmental conditions near glazed facades with shading devices—Part I: experiments and building thermal model. Build Environ 45(11):2506–2516Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chi-Ming L, Yao-Hong W (2011) Energy-saving potential of building envelope designs in residential houses in Taiwan. Energies 4:2061–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebrahimpour A, Maerefat M (2010) Application of advanced glazing and overhangs in residential buildings. Energy Convers Manag 52(2011):212–219Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiocchi C, Hoque S, Shahadat M (2011) Climate responsive design and the Milam Residence. Sustainability 3(2011):2289–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammad B, Abu-hijleh (2010) The energy savings potential of using dynamic external louvers in an office building. Energy Build 42:1888–1895Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kensek K, Noble D, Schiler M, Setiadarma E (1996) Shading mask: a teaching tool for sun shading devices. Autom Constr 5:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim G, Lim H, Lim T, Schaefer L, Kim J (2012) Comparative advantage of an exterior shading device in thermal performance for residential buildings. Energy Build 46:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lam M, Miller A (2009) Shading performance of vertical deciduous climbing plant canopy. Build Environ 45:81–88. Accessed 5 Feb 2016. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com
  11. 11.
    Meyer WT (1982) Energy economics and building design. McGraw-Hill, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olgyay V (1963) Design with climate: bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palmero-Marrero A, Oliveira A (2009) Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements. Appl Energy 87:2040–2049. Accessed 5 Feb 2016. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com
  14. 14.
    Tzempelikos A, Athienitis A (2006) The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Sol Energy 81(2007):369–382Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tzempelikos A, Bessoudo M, Athienitis A, Zmeureanu R (2010) Indoor thermal environmental conditions near glazed facades with shading devices e Part II: thermal comfort simulation and impact of glazing and shading properties. Build Environ 45:2517–2525. Accessed 5 Feb 2016. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com
  16. 16.
    Wong NH, Istiadji AD (2004) Effect of external shading devices on daylighting penetration in residential buildings. Light Res Technol 36(4):317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu L, Watanabe T, Hiroshi Y, Gao W (2008) Research on energy consumption of urban apartment buildings in China. J Environ Eng 73:183–190Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.British University in DubaiDubaiUAE

Personalised recommendations