Skip to main content

Complexity Based Analysis of eGov Ontologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (EGOVIS 2017)

Abstract

The analysis of complexity of ontologies in a domain reveals their underlying characteristics and support their selection, reuse and maintenance. This study performs the analysis of e-government ontologies in the oeGov repository based on their complexity. The complexity metrics of oeGov ontologies are computed and analysed. Results revealed that only the top level ontologies in the oeGov architecture have classes, properties and instances; the majority of the constituents of the oeGov repository are instances or datasets of the top level ontologies. Results further revealed important facts on the distribution of relations and instances in the oeGov ontologies and portrayed that the government (gov) and geopolitical ontologies are the more complex ontologies in the oeGov repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 43, 907–928 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neches, R., Fikes, R.E., Finin, T., Gruber, T.R., Senator, T., Swartout, W.R.: Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Mag. 12, 36–56 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, H., Li, Y.F., Tan, H.B.K.: Measuring design complexity of semantic web ontologies. Syst. Softw. 83, 803–814 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Ye, C.: Evaluation metrics for ontology complexity and evolution analysis. In: IEEE International Conference e-Business Engineering, pp. 162–170 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sabucedo, L.M.A., Rifon, L.E.A., Corradini, F., Polzonetti, A., Re, B.: Knowledge-based platform for e-government agents: a web-based solution using semantic technologies. J. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 3647–3656 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiao, Y., Xioa, M., Zhao, H.: An ontology for e-government knowledge modelling and interoperability. In: IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM 2007), Shanghai, China, pp. 3600–3603 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jarrar, M., Deik, A., Farraj, B.: Ontology-based data process governance framework - the case of e-government interoperability in palestine. In: IFIP International Symposium on Data-Driven Process Discovery and Analysis (SIMPDA 2011), Campione, Italy, pp. 83–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. oeGov: Ontologies for e-Government. http://www.oegov.us/

  9. Kang, D., Xu, B., Lu, J., Chu, W.C.: A complexity measure for ontology based on UML. In: 10th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 222–228 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fenton, N., Melton, A.: Deriving structurally based software measures. J. Syst. Softw. 12, 177–187 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chidamber, S., Kemerer, C.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20, 476–493 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brito, E., Abreu, F., Melo, W.: Evaluating the impact of object-oriented design on software quality. In: 3rd International Metric Symposium, pp. 90–99 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manso, M., Genero, M., Piattini, M.: Non-redundant metrics for UML class diagram structural complexity. In: 15th International Conference Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 50–65 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maiga, G., Ddembe, W.: Flexible biomedical ontology selection tool. Int. J. Comput. ICT Res. Spec. Issue 3, 53–66 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yao, H., Orme, A., Etzkorn, L.: Cohesion metrics for ontology design and application. J. Comput. Sci. 1, 107–113 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tartir, S., Arpinar, B., Moore, M., Sheth, A., Aleman-meza, B.: OntoQA: metric-based ontology quality analysis. In: IEEE Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition from Distributed, Autonomous, Semantically Heterogeneous Data and Knowledge Sources, pp. 45–53 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mallea, A., Arenas, M., Hogan, A., Polleres, A.: On blank nodes. In: Aroyo, L., Welty, C., Alani, H., Taylor, J., Bernstein, A., Kagal, L., Noy, N., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 421–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugumaran, V., Gula, J.T.: Applied Semantic Web Technologies. Tailor & Francis Group, LLC, Abingdon (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jena, M.B.: Implementing the RDF model and syntax specification. In: 2nd International Workshop on the Semantic Web - SemWeb 2001, pp. 308–320 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ding, Y., Lonsdale, D., Embley, D.W., Hepp, M., Xu, L.: Generating ontologies via language components and ontology reuse. In: Kedad, Z., Lammari, N., Métais, E., Meziane, F., Rezgui, Y. (eds.) NLDB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4592, pp. 131–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73351-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Vincent Fonou-Dombeu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fonou-Dombeu, J.V., Kazadi, Y.K. (2017). Complexity Based Analysis of eGov Ontologies. In: KÅ‘, A., Francesconi, E. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10441. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64248-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64248-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64247-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64248-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics