Abstract
Privatization of urban space is increasing, the needs of the global economy push out those of ordinary citizens and austerity increasingly provides the horizons of urban politics. On these grounds, one can quite easily understand the appeal of the post-political city thesis as articulated by urbanist Erik Swyngedouw. His post-political city is largely devoid of proper politics, governed instead through managerial consensus-driven political systems. In this chapter, we consider the implications of this approach for the field of urban studies. We assert that closer inspection of the post-political city thesis shows a restricting account of contemporary urban politics, unhelpful for thinking about the dynamics of (de)politicization in urban contexts. Our main argument is that work within the frame of the post-political city avoids or is inconsistent about the “urban”, while being very prescriptive about politics. This is problematic because the “post-political city” has become something of a label for the lack of politics in and about the city. We conclude the piece by proposing ways of realigning the field of enquiry. Our fundamental concern throughout is epistemological: when we look at the city through the post-political lens, what happens to politics?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Becker, S., Beveridge, R., & Naumann, M. (2015). Remunicipalisation in German Cities: Contesting Neo-liberalism and Re-imagining Urban Governance? Space and Polity, 19(1), 76–90.
Brenner, N., & Schmid C. (2015). Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban? City, 19(2/3), 151–182.
Chambers, S. A. (2011). Jacques Rancière and the Problem of Pure Politics. European Journal of Political Theory, 10(3), 303–326.
Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., & Routledge, P. (2012). Articulating Climate Justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the Commons, and Solidarity. Antipode, 45(3), 602–620.
Crane, N. J. (2015). Book Review of Space, Politics and Aesthetics. Space and Polity, 19(2), 206–208.
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Darling, J. (2014). Asylum and the Post-political: Domopolitics, Depoliticisation and Acts of Citizenship. Antipode, 46(1), 72–91.
Davidson, M., & Iveson, K. (2015). Recovering the Politics of the City: From the ‘Post-political City’ to a ‘Method of Equality’ for Critical Urban Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), 543–559.
Dean, J. (2009). Politics Without Politics. Parallax, 15(3), 20–36.
Deas, I. (2014). The Search for Territorial Fixes in Subnational Governance: City-regions and the Disputed Emergence of Post-political Consensus in Manchester, England.Urban Studies, 51(11), 2285–2314.
Featherstone, D. (2012). Articulating ‘New Partitions of the Sensible’. Political Geography, 31(5), 324–333.
Foucault, M. (1993). Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias. In J. Ockman (Ed.), Architecture—Culture 1943–1968 A Document Anthology. New York: Rizzoli.
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, B. (2014). Repoliticising Depoliticization: Theoretical Preliminaries on Some Responses to the American Fiscal and Eurozone Debt Crises. Policy and Politics, 42(2), 207–223.
Keane, J. (2009). The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon & Schuster.
Kohn, M. (2004). Brave New Neighbourhoods: The Privatization of Public Space. London/New York: Routledge.
Kohn, M. (2013). Privatization and Protest: Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Toronto, and the Occupation of Public Space in a Democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 99–110.
Larner, W. (2014). The Limits of Post-politics: Rethinking Radical Social Enterprise. In J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The Post-political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics (pp. 189–207). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
MacLeod, G. (2011). Urban Politics Reconsidered: Growth Machine to Post-democratic City? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2629–2660.
MacLeod, G., & Jones, M. (2011). Renewing Urban Politics. Urban Studies, 48, 2443–2472.
Madden, D. J. (2012). City Becoming World: Nancy, Lefebvre, and the Global-Urban Imagination. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(5), 772–787.
Magnusson, W. (2011). Politics of Urbanism: Seeing Like a City. London: Routledge.
Magnusson, W. (2014). The Symbiosis of the Urban and the Political. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1561–1575.
Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Marchart, O. (2011a). The Second Return of the Political: Democracy and the Syllogism of Equality. In P. Bowman & R. Stamp (Eds.), Reading Rancière (pp. 129–147). London/New York: Continuum.
Marchart, O. (2011b). Democracy and Minimal Politics: The Political Difference and Its Consequences. South Atlantic Quarterly, 110(4), 965–973.
McCarthy, J. (2013). We Have Never been ‘Postpolitical’. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 24(1), 19–25.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge Press.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
Nicholls, W., & Uitermark J. (2016). Introduction: Planning/Resistance. Urban Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1168570, accessed 15 May 2016.
Prentoulis, M., & Thomassen, L. (2013). Political Theory in the Square: Protest, Representation and Subjectification. Contemporary Political Theory, 12(3), 166–184.
Purcell, M. (2014). Ranciere and Revolution. Space and Polity, 18(2), 168–181.
Raco, M., & Lin, W.-I. (2012). Urban Sustainability, Conflict Management, and the Geographies of Post-politicism: A case study of Taipei. Environment and Planning C, 30(2), 191–208.
Rancière, J. (2003). Comment and Responses. Theory & Event, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2003.0017.
Rancière, J. (2009). Hatred of Democracy. London: Verso.
Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London/New York: Continuum.
Rancière, J. (2014). Das Unvernehmen Politik und Philosophie. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt.
Rodgers, S., Barnett, C., & Cochrane, A. (2014). Where Is Urban Politics? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1551–1560.
Roy, A. (2015). What Is Urban About Critical Urban Theory? Urban Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105485, accessed 15 May 2016.
Schattschneider, E. (1975). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Impossible/Undesirable Sustainability and the Post-Political Condition. In J. R. Krueger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The Sustainable Development Paradox (pp. 13–40). New York: Guilford Press.
Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The Antinomies of the Post-political City. In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620.
Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Impossible Sustainability and the Post-political Condition. In M. Cerreta, G. Concilio, & V. Monno (Eds.), Making Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values. Dordrecht: Springer.
Swyngedouw, E. (2014a). Insurgent Architects, Radical Cities and the Promise of the Political. In J. Wilson & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics (pp. 169–188). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Swyngedouw, E. (2014b). Where Is the Political? Insurgent Mobilisations and the Incipient “Return of the Political”. Space and Polity 18(2), 122–136.
Uitermark, J., & Nicholls, W. (2014). From Politicization to Policing: The Rise and Decline of New Social Movements in Amsterdam and Paris. Antipode, 46(4), 970–991.
Wilson, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (Eds.). (2014). The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Žižek, S. (2008). In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.
Acknowledgements
This is a revised and combined version of two articles:
Ross Beveridge and Philippe Koch, “The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city”, Urban Studies, Vol 54, Issue 1, pp. 31–43.
Ross Beveridge and Philippe Koch, “What is (still) political about the city?” Urban Studies, Vol 54, Issue 1, pp. 62–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beveridge, R., Koch, P. (2019). Depoliticization and Urban Politics: Moving Beyond the “Post-political” City. In: Buller, J., Dönmez, P., Standring, A., Wood, M. (eds) Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in Europe . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64236-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64236-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64235-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64236-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)