Skip to main content

Imposter Syndrome as a Public Feeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education ((GED))

Abstract

What happens when we re-think ‘imposter syndrome’ in academic labor as a public feeling? What can imposter syndrome tell us about who gets to know what, about what, and how? In this chapter, I present a short piece of auto-ethnographic fiction, about the feelings associated with imposter syndrome in the particular context of feminist academia and early career academic work. Imposter syndrome—sensations of not belonging; feeling that one’s competence and success are fundamentally fraudulent and inauthentic; the conviction of having somehow ‘tricked’ students, colleagues, peer reviewers, and publishers; and the fear that it is only a matter of time before this is discovered—is popularly understood as an individual—private—problem of faulty self-esteem. However, this chapter draws on Cvetkovich (SAQ: South Atlantic Quarterly, 106(3), 459–468, 2007; Cvetkovich, Depression: A public feeling. London: Duke University Press, 2012) to argue instead that imposter syndrome is a ‘public feeling’ in higher education (HE). Building upon precedents in feminist sociologies of emotion, and queer affect studies, re-thinking imposter syndrome as a public feeling has three elements: (1) situating the affective landscape of imposterism in socio-political context; how is feeling like an imposter marked by intersections of class, gender, ‘race’ and ethnicity, disability, sexuality, and factors including caring responsibilities, being of the first familial generation to enter HE? (2) analyzing feelings of imposterism as something like a ‘diagnostic of power’ (Abu-Lughod, 1990) and asking what such feelings can tell us about the structure and governance of increasingly neo-liberal, marketised HEIs, and about power relationships in knowledge production; (3) understanding imposter syndrome not as an individual problem to be overcome, but rather as a resource for political action and site of agency, as early career academics transition to employment in a sector increasingly characterized by casualization, precarity, and ‘entrepreneurial’ competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I’ve used quotation marks—scare quotes—around ‘imposter’ syndrome in most of this text. I think that conceptualizing the feelings associated with imposterism as a syndrome carries precisely the individualizing and pathologizing connotations that public feelings seek to trouble and undo. However, I’ve used this term throughout the chapter, alongside attempts to unsettle and dislodge the implication that feeling like an imposter is an individual—or private—problem.

  2. 2.

    The Research Excellence Framework is a joint undertaking of the UK government Department for Employment and Learning and the higher education funding councils of England, Wales, and Scotland. The REF describes itself as ‘the new system for assessing the quality of research in UK higher education institutions’; the first set of results were published in 2014, ranking research ‘outputs’, ‘impacts’, and ‘environment’ on a one- to four-star rating system (see REF 2014). The Teaching Excellence Framework, recently introduced by the UK government, ‘aims to recognize and reward excellent learning and teaching’ and is being implemented in England via the Higher Education Funding Council for England (see TEF 2017).

References

  • Abrahams, J., & Ingram, N. (2013). The chameleon habitus: Exploring local students’ negotiations of multiple fields. Sociological Research Online, 18(4), 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addison, M. (2012). Feeling your way within and across classed spaces: The (re)making and (un)doing of identities of value within higher education in the UK. In Y. Taylor (Ed.), Educational diversity: The subject of difference and different subjects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K., Quinn, J., Hollingworth, S., & Rose, A. (2012). Doing diversity and evading equality: The case of student work placements in the creative sector. In Y. Taylor (Ed.), Educational diversity: The subject of difference and different subjects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. (2015). The black studies movement in Britain: Addressing the crisis in British academia and social life. In Aiming higher: Race, inequality and diversity in the academy. London: Runnymede Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teachers’ soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathmaker, A.-M., Ingram, N. A., Abrahams, J., Hoare, T., Waller, R., & Bradley, H. (2016). Higher education, social class and social mobility: The degree generation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Introduction: Knowledge production in global context: Power and coloniality. Current Sociology Monographs, 62(4), 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K. (2015). Black thought matters: Patricia Hill Collins and the long tradition of African American sociology. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(13), 2315–2321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K., & Santos, B. (2017). Introduction: Global challenges for sociology. Sociology, 51(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxer, M. J. (1998). When women ask the questions: Creating women’s studies in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeze, M. (2015). Seriousness in women’s roller derby: Gender, organization, and ambivalence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brems, C., Baldwin, M. R., Davis, L., & Namyniuk, L. (1994). The imposter syndrome as related to teaching evaluations and advising relationships of university faculty members. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(2), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the H-Index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clance, P. R. (1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Atlanta: Peachtree Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett, J. L., & Avelis, J. (2013). Family-friendliness, fraudulence, and gendered academic career ambitions. American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, A. (2000). Consumerism and compulsory individuality: Women, will and potential. In S. Ahemd, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. McNeil, & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Transformations: Thinking through feminism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, A. (2007). Public feelings. SAQ: South Atlantic Quarterly, 106(3), 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donaghue, N., Gill, R., & Kurtz, T. (2014). The psychic life of neoliberalism: Towards a feminist approach. Rome: International Society for Political Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In R. Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2014). Academics, cultural workers and critical labour studies. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2016). Resilience, apps and reluctant individualism: Technologies of self in the neoliberal academy. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, D. (2009). Moving politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s fight against AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Granfield, R. (1991). Making it by faking it: Working-class students in an elite academic environment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20(3), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic professions in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s ‘truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 2(2), 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hark, S. (2016). Contending directions. Gender studies in the entrepreneurial university. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartstock, N. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s ‘truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 2(2), 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haushofer, J. (2016). CV of failures, [online]. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from https://www.princeton.edu/haushofer/Johannes_Haushofer_CV_of_Failures.pdf

  • Hekman, S. (1997). Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 2(2), 341–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, V. (2001). The construction of academic time: Sub-contracting academic labour in research. Journal of Educational Policy, 16(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmwood, J. (2015). Early career planning and the management of the academic self in the neo-liberal university. The Sociological Review Blog [online]. Retrieved February 10, 2016, from http://www.thesociologicalreview.com/blog/early-career-planning-and-the-management-of-the-academic-self-in-there-neo-liberal-university.html

  • Inckle, K. (2010). Telling tales? Using ethnographic fictions to speak embodied ‘truth’. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, N., & Waller, R. (2015). Higher education and the reproduction of social elites. Discover Society, 20. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/26462.

  • Knights, D., & Clarke, C. (2014). It’s a bittersweet symphony, this life: Fragile academic selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies, 35(3), 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwood, C. (2004). A critique of institutional inequalities in higher education. Theory and Research in Education, 2(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research policy and academic performativity: Compliance, contestation and complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1162–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2013). Fiction as research practice: Short stories, novellas, and novels. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveday, V. (2016). Embodying deficiency through ‘affective practice’: Shame, relationality, and the lived experience of social class and gender in higher education. Sociology, 50(6), 1140–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, B. (2016). Think like an impostor, and you’ll go far in academia. Times Higher Education [online]. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/think-impostor-and-youll-go-far-academia

  • Murray, O. (2018). Feel the fear and killjoy anyway: Being a challenging feminist presence in precarious academia. In Y. Taylor & K. Lahad (Eds.), Feeling academic in the neoliberal university: Feminist flights, fights and failures (THIS VOLUME).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. (2012). ‘Feminist theory is proper knowledge, but …’: The status of feminist scholarship in the academy. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. (2016). Struggling within and beyond the performative university: Articulating activism and work in an “academia without walls”. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. (2017a). “You can feel the exhaustion in the air all around you” The mood of academia and its effects on feminist scholars. Paper presentation given at Educational Futures and Fractures Conference, University of Strathclyde, February 24, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. (2017b). Power, knowledge and feminist scholarship: An ethnography of academia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteet, B. J., Brown, C. M., Lige, Q. M., & Lanaway, D. A. (2014). Impostorism is associated with greater psychological distress and lower self-esteem for African American students. Current Psychology, 34(1), 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramazanoglu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009). Strangers in Paradise: Working class students in elite universities. Sociology, 43(6), 1103–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working-class students in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(1), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A. C. (2007). Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: A story seeking consideration. Qualitative Research, 7(4), 521–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefan, M. (2010). A CV of failures. Nature, 468, 467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Y. (2013). Queer encounters of sexuality and class: Navigating emotional landscapes of academia. Emotion, Space and Society, 8, 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Y. (2014). The entrepreneurial university: Engaging publics, intersecting impacts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Res-Sisters. (2016a). Research, resistance and sisterhood: Early career feminists take on the neoliberal academy. Paper presented at British Sociological Association (BSA) Annual Conference, Birmingham, April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Res-Sisters. (2016b). “I’m an early career feminist academic: Get me out of here?” Encountering and resisting the neoliberal academy. In R. Thwaites & A. Pressland (Eds.), Being an early career feminist academic: Global perspectives, experiences, and challenges. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (2016). ‘I’m not worthy!’—Imposter syndrome in academia’. The Research Whisperer [online]. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from https://theresearchwhisperer.wordpress.com/2016/02/02/imposter-syndrome/

  • Waller, R., Ingram, N., & Ward, M. R. M. (Eds.). (2017). Higher education and social inequalities: Getting in, getting on and getting out. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (2016). Directions for public sociology: Novel writing as a creative approach. Cultural Sociology, 10(4), 431–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Feeling like an imposter has often involved the poisonous suspicion that the generous support, encouragement, and mentorship of colleagues and friends must come from a place of pity, people are helping me because they feel so sorry for me and can clearly see how hopeless I am! I say poisonous because this does a toxic disservice to the generosity, work, and emotional labor that has absolutely made it possible for me to carry on working in academia. So many thanks to Yvette Taylor and Kinneret Lahad for editing this collection and for all your encouragement and mentorship besides. Thanks to the University of Edinburgh Sociology 2016 New Directions conference for the chance to present—and very helpfully discuss—nascent ideas on this topic, and in particular to Karen Gregory for insightful comments. Similar thanks to the Queen Margaret University Public Sociology Seminar Series for extremely helpful discussion of this paper, particularly to Eurig Scandrett for insights in relation to meritocracy and accountability, and with the Centre for Applied Social Science for funds to present this work at the 2017 British Sociological Association conference. Thanks to Maria do Mar Pereira for really incisive and generous discussion at this event. Endless thanks to Darcy, Hilary, Vic, Jo, Kathleen, Órla, and Lena for existing and talking with me about these, and many other, challenges in feminist academic work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Breeze, M. (2018). Imposter Syndrome as a Public Feeling. In: Taylor, Y., Lahad, K. (eds) Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64224-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64224-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64223-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64224-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics