Failure to Launch? Feminist Endeavors as a Partial Academic

  • Heather Shipley
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

What constitutes ‘success’ in academia and how has that notion shifted in the last decade? The norms of transitioning from post-graduate studies into a lectureship or professorship have changed in an environment where those posts are decreasingly available and where many scholars become employed in non-academic posts while simultaneously engaging in academic endeavors. In the midst of this changing landscape, the inherent tension between being a feminist and participating in a competitive academic environment further complicates traditional notions about ‘success.’ The tension of being a feminist in an academic space begins in student life with the expectation that we are all competing with one another (for grades, for that conference slot, for a publication) and becomes a deeply entrenched aspect of academic life once the degree has been completed. Drawing on the ups and downs of life as a partial academic, holding a non-academic post and yet using personal time to continue to engage in academic endeavors, I will consider the ways the academic environment—while theoretically promoting feminism through feminist programs—as a system itself undermines and devalues feminist pursuits, rewarding instead decidedly nonfeminist goals through competition and individual achievement over group endeavors. Redefining what counts as academic success is the result both of a shifting employment market and of feminist engagement within a system that rewards un-feminist goals and aspirations; notions about success and failure within feminist academic endeavors subsequently recast what it is to ‘be’ an academic today.

References

  1. Almeida, D. A. (1997). The hidden half: A history of Native American women’s education. Harvard Educational Review, 67(4). Retrieved October 10, 2016, from http://hepg.org/her-home/issues/harvard-educational-review-volume-67-issue-4
  2. American Council on Education. (2016). New report looks at the status of women in higher education. Retrieved November 5, 2016, from http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/New-Report-Looks-at-the-Status-of-Women-in-Higher-Education.aspx
  3. Arnot, M. (1982). Male hegemony, social class and women’s education. The Journal of Education, 164(1), 64–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awde, S. (2016). U of O falls short on diversity in nominating Canada Research Chairs. Fulcrum. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from http://thefulcrum.ca/news/u-o-falls-short-diversity-nominating-canada-research-chairs/
  5. Braithwaite, A., Heald, S., Luhmann, S., & Rosenberg, S. (2005). Troubling women’s studies: Pasts, presents and possibilities. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess-Johnson, K. (2002). The backlash against feminist philosophy. In A. M. Superson & A. E. Cudd (Eds.), Theorizing backlash: Philosophical reflections on the resistance to feminism (pp. 19–48). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Cambridge University Press. (2016). Aesthetics, athletics and the Olympics. Cambridge.org. Retrieved September 21, 2016, from http://www.cambridge.org/about-us/news/aest/
  8. David, M. E. (2014). Feminism, gender, and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Davin, E. L. (2006). Partners in wonder: Women and the birth of science fiction 1926–1965. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins, K. (2014). ‘That’s not philosophy’: Feminism, academia, and the double bind. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(3), 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keller, E. F., & Moglen, H. (1987). Competition and feminism: Conflicts for academic women. Signs, 12(3), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lombardo, K. (2016). Corey Cogdell-Unrein: Women should be recognized outside of who we’re married to. Excelle Sports. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from http://www.excellesports.com/news/rio-olympics-corey-cogdell-unrein/
  13. Ritzer, G. (1996). McUniversity in the postmodern consumer society. Quality in Higher Education, 2(3), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ronson, J. (2014). The big-eyed children: The extraordinary story of an epic fraud. The Guardian. Retrieved November 10, 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/oct/26/art-fraud-margaret-walter-keane-tim-burton-biopic
  15. Solomon, B. M. (1985). In the company of educated women: A history of women and higher education in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Superson, A. M., & Cudd, A. E. (Eds.). (2002). Theorizing backlash: Philosophical reflections on the resistance to feminism. New York: Rowman & Littlefiedl Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Teitel, E. (2013). Why women’s studies needs an extreme makeover. Maclean’s. Retrieved September 29, 2016, from http://www.macleans.ca/education/university/why-womens-studies-needs-an-extreme-makeover/
  18. Wagner, A. (2014). The paradox of (in)visibility: Fostering self-reflexivity in the classroom. Atlantis: A Women’s Studies Journal, 36(3), 100–110.Google Scholar
  19. Webber, M. (2008). Miss Congeniality meets the new managerialism: Feminism, contingent labour, and the new university. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 38(3), 37–56.Google Scholar
  20. Weiler, K. (2001). Feminist engagements: Reading, resisting, and revisioning male theorists in educations and cultural studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Women’s and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes (WGSRF). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.wgsrf.com/
  22. Worthen, M. (2016). 3 women scientists whose discoveries were credited to men. Bio. Retrieved September 29, 2016, from http://www.biography.com/news/famous-female-scientists

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather Shipley
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Human Rights, Equity and Inclusion, York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations