Advertisement

On the Thresholds of Legitimacy: A Collaborative Exploration of Being and Becoming Academic

  • Susanne Gannon
  • Sarah Powell
  • Clare Power
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

This chapter uses a collective biography methodology to explore threshold moments of academic legitimacy. They demonstrate the precarious processes and liminal spaces of being and becoming ‘academic’. We examine how the well-documented practices that characterise the corporate/managerial/enterprise university frame the experiences of women aspiring to work in the sector and the affective and embodied ramifications of such practices as casualisation, contractualism, and competition between intellectual workers. Informed by work on academic subjectivities in contemporary universities (e.g. Bansel, Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 543–556, 2011; Mewburn, Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 321–332, 2011; Petersen and Davies, Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 92–109, 2010; Petersen, Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 475–487, 2007; Petersen, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(3), 394–406, 2008), and specifically on analyses of women’s experiences (e.g. Clegg, Privilege, agency and affect: Understanding the production and effects of action. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013; David, Feminism, gender and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2014; Leathwood and Read, Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future? Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2009; Wilson et al., Gender and Education, 22(5), 535–545, 2010), we explore ambivalence, desire, disappointment, and at times joy in our experiences of securing PhDs and seeking work in universities. We argue that for early career and aspiring academics, becoming ‘academic’ is a precarious, contingent process where legitimacy is always provisional and reliant on conferral from those who are powerfully positioned in and beyond the institution of the academy.

References

  1. Abetz, J. S. (2016). ‘You can be anything but you can’t have it all’: Discursive struggles of career ambition during doctoral candidacy. Western Journal of Communication, 80(5), 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bansel, P. (2011). Becoming academic: A reflection on doctoral candidacy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, L., & Watson, P. (2010). Understanding the experiences of female doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(3), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, S., Blumenstein, M., & Cook, C. (2013). Different for women? The challenges of doctoral studies. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charteris, J., Gannon, S., Mayes, E., Nye, A., & Stephenson, L. (2016a). The emotional knots of academicity: A collective biography of academic subjectivities and spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charteris, J., Jones, M., Nye, A., & Reyes, V. (2016b). A heterotopology of the academy: Mapping assemblages as possibilised heterotopias. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1250178.
  8. Clegg, S. (2013). The space of academia: Privilege, agency and the erasure of affect. In C. Maxwell & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Privilege, agency and affect: Understanding the production and effects of action (pp. 71–87). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David, M. (2014). Feminism, gender and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, B. (1989). Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). The practices of collective biography. In B. Davies & S. Gannon (Eds.), Doing collective biography (pp. 1–15). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (Eds.). (2009). Pedagogical encounters. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2012). Collective biography and the entangled enlivening of being. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(4), 357–376.Google Scholar
  15. Dever, M., Boreham, P., Haynes, M., Kubler, M., Laffan, W., Behrens, K., et al. (2008). Gender differences in early post-PhD employment in Australian universities: The influence of PhD experience on women’s academic careers final report. Universities Australia & University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  16. Gannon, S., Kligte, G., McLean, J., Perrier, M., Swan, E., & Vanni, I. (2015). Uneven relationalities, collective biography and sisterly affect in neoliberal universities. Feminist Formations, 27(3), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gonick, M., & Gannon, S. (Eds.). (2014). Becoming girl: Collective biography and the production of girlhood. Toronto, ON: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hartung, C., Barnes, N., Welch, R., O’Flynn, G., Uptin, J., & McMahon, S. (2017). Beyond the academic precariat: A collective biography of poetic subjectivities in the neoliberal university. Sport, Education and Society, 22(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haug, F., Andresen, S., Bünz-Elfferding, A., Hauser, K., Lang, U., Laudan, M., et al. (1987). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Kern, L., Hawkins, R., Al-Hindi, K. F., & Moss, P. (2014). A collective biography of joy in academic practice. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(7), 834–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lahad, K. (2014). The single woman’s choice as a zero-sum game. Cultural Studies, 28(2), 240–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2009). Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future? Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mewburn, I. (2011). Troubling talk: Assembling the PhD candidate. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morley, L. (2011). Misogyny posing as measurement: Disrupting the feminisation crisis discourse. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 6(2), 223–235.Google Scholar
  25. O’Connor, M. K., Netting, F. E., Cole, P. L., Hopkins, K., Jones, J. L., Kim, Y., et al. (2015). Voice and community in the corporate academy: A collective biography. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 30(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peabody, R. (2014). The unruly PhD. Doubts, detours, departures and other success stories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Petersen, E. B. (2007). Negotiating academicity: Postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petersen, E. B. (2008). The conduct of concern: Exclusionary discursive practices and subject positions in academia. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(3), 394–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petersen, E. B., & Davies, B. (2010). In/difference in the neoliberalised university. Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson, J., Marks, G., Noone, L., & Hamilton-Mackenzie, J. (2010). Retaining a foothold on the slippery paths of academia: University women, indirect discrimination, and the academic marketplace. Gender and Education, 22(5), 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wyatt, J., Davies, B., Gale, K., & Gannon, S. (2017). Creating a space in between: Collaborative research inquiries. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Gannon
    • 1
  • Sarah Powell
    • 1
  • Clare Power
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations