A Long Goodbye to the ‘Good Girl’: An Auto-ethnographic Account

  • Pat Thomson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

The contemporary university relies on academic staff who are ready and willing to be highly productive on a number of fronts—publish widely and for a range of audiences, publish for audit purposes, attract funding, work in interdisciplinary teams, produce demonstrable research impact, teach face to face and online to increasing numbers of students, and so on. In this chapter I consider, mobilising Bourdieu, how these performative institutional logics and practices trigger responses in particular women, those of us trained to be ‘good girls’. Using myself as an example, and working to find the social in the individual narrative, I argue that schooling and family practices combined with second wave feminism to produce academic women highly disposed to getting ahead in the scholarly game while also, and at the same time, being suspicious and critical of it. Facing the inevitability of retirement I, and other women in a similar position, may finally be able to adopt a different strategy, that of ‘doing just enough of what’s expected’.

References

  1. Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. (2010). Being a university. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2007). Performing and reforming leaders: Gender, educational restructuring and organisational change. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1987). The biographical illusion. Working Papers and Proceedings of the Centre for Psychosocial Studies (University of Chicago), 14, 1–7.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C., & de Saint Martin, M. (1995). Academic discourse (R. Teese, Trans., 1965 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourriaud, N. (1998). Relational aesthetics. Paris: Les Presses du Reel.Google Scholar
  12. David, M. (2016). A feminist manifesto for education. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life (S. Randall, Trans.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Delamont, S. (2007, Feburary). Arguments against autoethnography. Qualitative Researcher, 4, 2–4. Retrieved from http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/qualiti/QualitativeResearcher/QR_Issue4_Feb07.pdf
  15. Done, E. (2013). The supervisory assemblage. A singular doctoral experience. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Eisenstein, H. (2009). Feminism seduced. How global elites use women’s labour and ideas to exploit the world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge (A. Sheridan, Trans., 1995 ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans., 1991 ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, C., & Thomson, P. (2017). Inspiring school change. Transforming education through the creative arts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation. Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Holmwood, J. (2011). A manifesto for the public university. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  23. Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006/2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Lather, P. (1991). Feminist research: With/against. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Macfarlane, B. (2004). Teaching with integrity: The ethics of higher education practice. London: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McWilliam, E. (2000). Pedagogical pleasures. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play. Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalisation: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 91–107). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Rose, M., & McClafferty, K. (2001). A call for the teaching of writing in graduate education. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sayers, A. (2010). Bourdieu, ethics and practice. In E. Silva & A. Warde (Eds.), Cultural analysis and Bourdieu’s legacy (pp. 87–101). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone. The postmodern embrace. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thomson, P. (1998). Thoroughly modern management and a cruel accounting: The effect of public sector reform on public education. In A. Reid (Ed.), Going public: Education policy and public education in Australia (pp. 37–46). Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.Google Scholar
  35. Thomson, P. (2002). Schooling the rustbelt kids. Making the difference in changing times. Sydney: Allen & Unwin (Trentham Books UK).Google Scholar
  36. Thomson, P. (2010). Headteacher autonomy: A sketch of Bourdieuian field analysis of position and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson, P., & Hall, C. (2017). Place based method for researching schools. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  38. Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2013). Writing for peer reviewed journals: Strategies for getting published. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2016). Detox your writing. Strategies for doctoral researchers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Ty, E., & Verduyn, C. (Eds.). (2008). Asian Canadian writing beyond autoethnography. Waterloo, Canada: Wildred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Winter, R. (1988). Fictional-critical writing: An approach to case study research by practitioners and for in-service and pre-service work with teachers. In J. Nias & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), The enquiring teacher: Supporting and sustaining teacher research (pp. 231–248). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pat Thomson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations