Advertisement

Overcoming Public Speaking Anxiety of Software Engineers Using Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

  • Merve Denizci Nazligul
  • Murat YilmazEmail author
  • Ulas Gulec
  • Mert Ali Gozcu
  • Rory V. O’Connor
  • Paul M. Clarke
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 748)

Abstract

Public speaking anxiety is a type of social phobia, which might be commonly seen in novice software engineers. It is usually triggered by a fear of social performance especially when the performer is unfamiliar with the audience. Today, many software engineering activities (e.g. code inspection, peer review, daily meetings, etc.) require social gatherings where individuals need to present their work. However, novice software engineers may not be able to reduce their performance anxiety during their course of education. In this study, we propose a virtual reality approach to construct a practice environment for improving novice software engineers’ pubic speaking experiences. Consequently, we examine the effects of virtual reality intervention on the public speaking experience of six novice software engineers from a computer engineering department. We designed a virtual auditorium to simulate the presentation delivery environment and findings suggest that using this infrastructure for training purposes can reduce presenter anxiety levels – which is consistent with related published studies. We believe that this virtual auditorium environment can deliver benefits for students and practitioners alike in terms of addressing the anxiety that is often associated with early stage career presenters.

Keywords

Virtual reality Public speaking anxiety Personal process improvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Bernárdez, B., Durán, A., Parejo, J.A., et al.: A controlled experiment to evaluate the effects of mindfulness in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, p. 17. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hazzan, O., Har-Shai, G.: Teaching and learning computer science soft skills using soft skills: the students’ perspective. In: Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 567–572. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peters, L., Moreno, A.M.: Educating software engineering managers-revisited what software project managers need to know today. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), vol. 2, pp. 353–359. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darmuki, A., Andayani, A., Nurkamto, J., Saddhono, K.: Evaluating information-processing-based learning cooperative model on speaking skill course. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 8, 44–51 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vitasari, P., Wahab, M.N.A., Herawan, T., Othman, A., Sinnadurai, S.K.: A pilot study of pre-post anxiety treatment to improve academic performance for engineering students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 15, 3826–3830 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huff, W.K.: Public Speaking: A Concise Overview for the Twenty-First Century. Peter Lang, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sampaio, A.Z., Martins, O.P.: The application of virtual reality technology in the construction of bridge: the cantilever and incremental launching methods. Autom. Constr. 37, 58–67 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jang, S., Vitale, J.M., Jyung, R.W., Black, J.B.: Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Comput. Educ. 106, 150–165 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bliss, J.P., Tidwell, P.D., Guest, M.A.: The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 6, 73–86 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seymour, N.E., Gallagher, A.G., Roman, S.A., O’brien, M.K., Bansal, V.K., Andersen, D.K., Satava, R.M.: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann. Surg. 236, 458–464 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grantcharov, T.P., Kristiansen, V., Bendix, J., Bardram, L., Rosenberg, J., Funch-Jensen, P.: Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br. J. Surg. 91, 146–150 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aydan, U., Yilmaz, M., Clarke, P.M., O’Connor, R.V.: Teaching ISO/IEC 12207 software lifecycle processes: a serious game approach. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 54, 129–138 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spielberger, C.D.: Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory STAI (form Y) (“self-evaluation questionnaire”) (1983)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vitasari, P., Wahab, M.N.A., Othman, A., Herawan, T., Sinnadurai, S.K.: The relationship between study anxiety and academic performance among engineering students. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 8, 490–497 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maner, J.K., Kenrick, D.T.: When adaptations go awry: functional and dysfunctional aspects of social anxiety. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 4, 111–142 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris, S.R., Kemmerling, R.L., North, M.M.: Brief virtual reality therapy for public speaking anxiety. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 5, 543–550 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bernátová, I., Balis, P., Goga, R., Behuliak, M., Zicha, J., Sekaj, I.: Lack of reactive oxygen species deteriorates blood pressure regulation in acute stress. Physiol. Res. 65, S381 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Granigg, G.M.: Essential oils and single fragrance compounds in health care. Ph.D. thesis, UniWien (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bodie, G.D.: A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Commun. Educ. 59, 70–105 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vîslă, A., Cristea, I.A., Tătar, A.S., David, D.: Core beliefs, automatic thoughts and response expectancies in predicting public speaking anxiety. Pers. Individ. Differ. 55, 856–859 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Behnke, R.R., Sawyer, C.R.: Milestones of anticipatory public speaking anxiety. Commun. Educ. 48, 165–172 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hindo, C.S., González-Prendes, A.A.: One-session exposure treatment for social anxiety with specific fear of public speaking. Res. Soc. Work Pract. 21, 528–538 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anderson, P.L., Zimand, E., Hodges, L.F., Rothbaum, B.O.: Cognitive behavioral therapy for public-speaking anxiety using virtual reality for exposure. Depress. Anxiety 22, 156–158 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Safir, M.P., Wallach, H.S., Bar-Zvi, M.: Virtual reality cognitive-behavior therapy for public speaking anxiety: one-year follow-up. Behav. Modif. 36, 235–246 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wallach, H.S., Safir, M.P., Bar-Zvi, M.: Virtual reality cognitive behavior therapy for public speaking anxiety: a randomized clinical trial. Behav. Modif. 33, 314–338 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anderson, P.L., Price, M., Edwards, S.M., Obasaju, M.A., Schmertz, S.K., Zimand, E., Calamaras, M.R.: Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 81, 751 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Diemer, J., Lohkamp, N., Mühlberger, A., Zwanzger, P.: Fear and physiological arousal during a virtual height challenge - effects in patients with acrophobia and healthy controls. J. Anxiety Disord. 37, 30–39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Opriş, D., Pintea, S., García-Palacios, A., Botella, C., Szamosközi, Ş., David, D.: Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a quantitative meta-analysis. Depress. Anxiety 29, 85–93 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anderson, P., Jacobs, C., Rothbaum, B.O.: Computer-supported cognitive behavioral treatment of anxiety disorders. J. Clin. Psychol. 60, 253–267 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brundage, S.B., Hancock, A.B.: Real enough: Using virtual public speaking environments to evoke feelings and behaviors targeted in stuttering assessment and treatment. Am. J. Speech Lan. Pathol. 24, 139–149 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burstin, A., Brown, R.: Virtual environments for real treatments. Pol. Ann. Med. 17, 101–111 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krijn, M., Emmelkamp, P.M., Olafsson, R.P., Biemond, R.: Virtual reality exposure therapy of anxiety disorders: a review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 24, 259–281 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bush, J.: Viability of virtual reality exposure therapy as a treatment alternative. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 1032–1040 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morina, N., Ijntema, H., Meyerbröker, K., Emmelkamp, P.M.: Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. Behav. Res. Ther. 74, 18–24 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tichon, J., Banks, J.: Virtual reality exposure therapy: 150-degree screen to desktop PC. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9, 480–489 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liebowitz, M.R.: Social Phobia. Karger Publishers, Basel (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soykan, Ç., Özgüven, H.D., Gençöz, T.: Liebowitz social anxiety scale: the Turkish version. Psychol. Rep. 93, 1059–1069 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wolpe, J.: Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci. 3, 234–240 (1958)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leary, M.R., Kowalski, R.M.: The interaction anxiousness scale: construct and criterion-related validity. J. Pers. Assess. 61, 136–146 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Coşkun, H.: Etkileşim kaygısı ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 12, 41–49 (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hope, D.A., Heimberg, R.G., Turk, C.L.: Managing Social Anxiety: A Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beidel, D.C., Turner, S.M., Jacob, R.G., Cooley, M.R.: Assessment of social phobia: reliability of an impromptu speech task. J. Anxiety Disord. 3, 149–158 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Field, A.: Regression. In: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, vol. 2, pp. 143–217 (2005)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ling, Y., Brinkman, W.P., Nefs, H.T., Qu, C., Heynderickx, I.: Effects of stereoscopic viewing on presence, anxiety, and cybersickness in a virtual reality environment for public speaking. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 21, 254–267 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Klinger, E., Bouchard, S., Légeron, P., Roy, S., Lauer, F., Chemin, I., Nugues, P.: Virtual reality therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy for social phobia: a preliminary controlled study. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8, 76–88 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wiederhold, B.K., Wiederhold, M.D.: A review of virtual reality as a psychotherapeutic tool. CyberPsychol. Behav. 1, 45–52 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merve Denizci Nazligul
    • 1
    • 3
  • Murat Yilmaz
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Ulas Gulec
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mert Ali Gozcu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rory V. O’Connor
    • 4
    • 5
  • Paul M. Clarke
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyÇankaya UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringÇankaya UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Virtual Reality Research and Development LaboratoryÇankaya UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublinIreland
  5. 5.Lero, The Irish Software Engineering Research CenterLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations