Advertisement

A New Corpus of Collaborative Dialogue Produced Under Cognitive Load Using a Driving Simulator

  • George ChristodoulidesEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10415)

Abstract

We present an experiment designed to collect both monologue and dialogue speech, produced under conditions that will tax the attentional resources of the speaker. Pairs of participants (native speakers of French) were asked to perform tasks involving use of the auditory memory, complex memorisation and recall, and collaborative exchange of information. Following the dual-task paradigm, we induced continuous attentional load to one of participants, using the Continuous Tracking and Reaction (ConTRe) task, in a driving simulator. In this article, we present the corpus and an initial analysis of the prosodic characteristics (silent pauses, filled pauses, disfluencies) in speech produced under cognitive load.

Keywords

Dialogue Cognitive load French Attention Prosody Disfluencies Hesitation Dual-task paradigm 

References

  1. 1.
    Boula de Mareüil, P., d’Alessandro, C., Raake, A., Bailly, G., Garcia, M.N., Morel, M.: A joint intelligibility evaluation of French text-to-speech synthesis systems: the EvaSy SUS/ACR campaign. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 2034–2037 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christodoulides, G.: Praaline: integrating tools for speech corpus research. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 31–34 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christodoulides, G., Avanzi, M., Goldman, J.P.: DisMo: a morphosyntactic, disfluency and multi-word unit annotator: an evaluation on a corpus of French spontaneous and read speech. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 3902–3907 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cowan, N.: Working memory and attention in language use. In: Guendouzi, J., Loncke, F., Williams, M.J. (eds.) The Handbook of Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Processes, pp. 75–98. Psychology Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engonopoulos, N., Sayeed, A., Demberg, V.: Language and cognitive load in a dual task environment. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2249–2254 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldman, J.P.: Easyalign: an automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2011, vol. 3233–3236 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hupin, B., Simon, A.C.: Analyse phonostylistique du discours radiophonique. Recherches en communication 28 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kassner, M., Patera, W., Bulling, A.: Pupil: an open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction: Technical report. http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0006
  9. 9.
    Mahr, A., Feld, M., Mehdi Moniri, M., Math, R.: The ConTRe (Continuous Tracking and Reaction) task: a flexible approach for assessing driver cognitive workload with high sensitivity. In: Kun, A.L., Boyle, L.N., Reimer, B., Riener, A. (eds.) Adjunct Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 88–91 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mertens, P.: The Prosogram: semi-automatic transcription of prosody based on a tonal perception model. In: Bel, B., Marlien, I. (eds.) Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, pp. 549–552 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raake, A., Katz, B.F.: SUS-based method for speech reception threshold measurement in French. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 2028–2033 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shriffin, R., Schneider, W.: Controlled and automatic human information processing II: perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol. Rev. 84(2), 127–190 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G., Banbury, S., Parasuraman, R.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 4th edn. Psychology Press, Hove (2012). International editionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Valibel, IL&CUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations