Abstract
The proximal femur is a usual anatomic location for primary malignant or benign tumors and metastatic disease [1, 2]. The improvement of surgical management of tumors of the proximal femur amalgamated with advances in the field of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy further improved the patients’ function and quality of life during the last years. Hindquarter amputation remains an option especially for aggressive sarcomas of the proximal femur; however, limb salvage is now more than ever a feasible option [2]. Reconstructive surgery is the method of choice to achieve limb salvage and retention of function [3].
References
Menendez LR, Ahlmann ER, Kermani C, Gotha H. Endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplasms of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:46–51.
Potter B, Chow V, Adams S, Letson GD, Temple HT. Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement: metastatic versus primary tumours. Surg Oncol. 2009;18(4):343.
Thambapillary S, Dimitriou R, Makridis KG, Fragkakis EM, Bobak P, Giannoudis PV. Implant longevity, complications and functional outcome following proximal femoral Arthroplasty for musculoskeletal tumors: a systematic review. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(8):1381–5.
Fox EJ, Hau MA, Gebhardt MC, Hornicek FJ, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Long-term follow-up of proximal femoral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:106–13.
Donati D, Giacomini S, Gozzi E, Mercuri M. Proximal femur reconstruction by an allograft prosthesis composite. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;394:192–200.
Farid Y, Lin PP, Lewis VO, Yasko AW. Endoprosthetic and allograft–prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:223–9.
McGoveran BM, Davis AM, Gross AE, Bell RS. Evaluation of the allograft–prosthesis composite technique for proximal femoral reconstruction after resection of a primary bone tumour. Can J Surg. 1999;42(1):37–45.
Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT. Allograft–prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207–23.
Kabukcuoglu Y, Grimer RJ, Tillman RM, Carter SR. Endoprosthetic replacement for primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:8–14.
Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, Kemp HBS, Sneath RS, Walker PS. Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(1):5–13.
Bickels J, Meller I, Henshaw RM, Malawer MM. Reconstruction of hip stability after proximal and total femur resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:218–30.
Donati D, Zavatta M, Gozzi E, Giacomini S, Campanacci L, Mercuri M. Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(8):1156–60.
Finstein JL, King JJ, Fox EJ, Ogilvie CM, Lackman RD. Bipolar proximal femoral replacement prostheses for musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:66–75.
Ogilvie CM, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC, Griffin AM, Bell RS. Functional outcome of endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:44–8.
Sharma S, Turcotte RE, Isler MH, Wong C. Experience with cemented large segment endoprostheses for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:54–9.
Zeegin EN, Aponte-Tinao LA, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Survivorship analysis of 141 modular metallic endoprostheses at early follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:239–50.
Chandrasekar C, Grimer R, Carter S, Tillmann RM, Abudu A, Jeys LM. Unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for tumour. The risk of revision in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:401–4.
Sokolovski V, Voloshin V, Aliev M, Zubikov VS, Saravanan SA, Martynenko DV, Nisichenko DV, Strelnikov KN. Total hip replacement for proximal femoral tumours: our midterm results. Int Orthop. 2006;30(5):399–402.
Chandrasekar C, Grimer R, Carter S, et al. Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(1):108.
Langlais F, Lambotte J, Colin P, et al. Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumours. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:197.
Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N, et al. Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprosthesis using a trevira tube. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:264.
Bruns J, Delling G, Gruber H, et al. Cementless fixation of megaprosthesis using a conical fluted stem in the treatment of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(8):1084.
Holt G, Christie M, Schwartz H. Trabecular metal endoprosthetic limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(7):1079.
Orlic D, Smerdelj M, Kolundzic R, et al. Lower limb salvage surgery: modular endoprosthesis in bone tumour treatment. Int Orthop. 2006;30(6):458.
Hattori H, Mibe J, Matsuoka H, et al. Surgical management of metastatic disease of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg. 2007;15(3):295.
van Kampen M, Grimer R, Carter S, et al. Replacement of the hip in children with a tumour in the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(4):785.
Graci C, Maccauro G, Mura Torp F, Spinelli MS, Rosa MA, Fabbriciani C. Infection following bone tumor resection and reconstruction with tumoral prostheses: a literature review. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010;23(4):1005–13.
Jacofsky OJ, Haidukewych GJ, Zhang H, Sim FH. Complication and results of arthroplasty for savage of failed treatment of malignant pathologic fractures of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427:52–6.
Joglekar SB, Rose PS, Lewallen DG, Sim FH. Tantalum acetabular cups provide secure fixation in THA after pelvic irradiation at minimum 5-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(11):3041–7.
Khan FA, Rose PS, Yanagisawa M, Lewallen DG, Sim FH. Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(2):594–601.
Rose PS, Halasy M, Trousdale RT, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG. Preliminary results of tantalum acetabular components for THA after pelvic radiation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:195–8.
Abudu A, Carter SR, Grimer RJ. The outcome and functional results of diaphyseal endoprostheses after tumour excision. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:652–7.
Aldlyami E, Abudu A, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Endoprosthetic replacement of diaphyseal bone defects: long-term results. Int Orthop. 2005;29:25–9.
Ozger H, Akgul T, Yildiz F, Topalan M. Biological reconstruction of the femur using double free vascularized fibular autografts in a vertical array because of a large defect following wide resection of an osteosarcoma: a case report with 7 years of follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2013;22(1):52–8.
Alman BA, De Bari A, Krajbich JI. Massive allografts in the treatment of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:54–64.
Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Bettin D, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W. Intramedullary, 86 antibiotic-loaded cemented, massive allografts for skeletal reconstruction: 26 cases compared with 19 uncemented allografts. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68:387–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kenanidis, E. et al. (2018). Tumor Resection. In: Tsiridis, E. (eds) The Adult Hip - Master Case Series and Techniques. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64177-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64177-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64175-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64177-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)