Skip to main content

Social Processes of Learning and Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems

Abstract

Sustainable Human Development is highly influenced by learning and innovation processes. Generating and using knowledge involve many actors and their interactions, a set often called the Innovation System. Innovation processes are shaped by who these actors actually are, what they do, in which ways they relate (or do not relate) to each other, and how power is distributed among them. A key aspect of innovation is how knowledge is incorporated in social practices. Analyzing those issues helps gauge the possibilities of knowledge democratization. When the power of knowledge is apparent in facts and trends, learning processes deserve special attention. They take place in different contexts shaped by interactions between several actors and are closely related to innovation. Democratizing knowledge requires generalizing learning activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s Next Giant. South Korea and late Industrialization. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2000). Looking at National Systems of Innovation from the South. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2012). Research and Innovation Policies for Social Inclusion: An Opportunity for Developing Countries. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries. In D. Archibugi & J. Michie (Eds.), Technology, Globalization and Economic Performance (pp. 83–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, F. L., & Keller, M. R. (Eds.). (2011). State of Innovation: The U.S. Government’s Role in Technology Development. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castaldi, C., Cimoli, M., Correa, N., & Dosi, G. (2009). Technological Learning, Policy Regimes, and Growth: The Long-Term Patterns and Some Specificities of a ‘Globalized’ Economy. In M. Cimoli, G. Dossi, & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation (pp. 39–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2011). Hamlet Without the Prince of Denmark: How Development Has Disappeared from Today’s ‘Development’ Discourse. In S. Khan & J. Christiansen (Eds.), Towards New Developmentalism: Market as Means rather than Master (pp. 47–58). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chataway, J., Hanlin, B., & Kaplisnky, R. (2013). Inclusive Innovation. An Architecture for Policy Development (IKD Working Paper No. 65). Milton Keynes: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. (1967). An Economic History of World Population. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1995). Places of Inquiry: Research and Advanced Education in Modern Universities. Berkeley: The California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couto, M. C., Scerri, M., & Marhajah, R. (2013). Inequality and Development Challenges. London: IDRC-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S., & Sutz, J. (2014). Innovation in Informal Settings: Reflections and Proposals for a Research Agenda. Innovation and Development, 4(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S., & Thakur, D. (2014). Innovation and Inequality. Emerging Technologies in an Unequal World. New York: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, G., & Dutrenit, G. (2014). Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development: The Latin American Experience. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Currie-Alder, B., Kanbur, R., Malone, D., & Medhora, R. (2014). The State of Development Thought. In B. Currie-Alder, R. Kanbur, D. Malone, & R. Medhora (Eds.), International Development. Ideas, Experience, and Prospects (pp. 1–20). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). (2016). Horizons 2030: Equality at the Centre of Sustainable Development (LC/G.2660(SES.36/3). Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, F. (1984). La industrialización trunca de América Latina. México D.F.: Centro Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1977). Malthus with a Computer. In A. Teich (Ed.), Technology and Man’s Future (pp. 82–98). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance – Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1996). Catching Up and Falling Behind: The Case of Asia and Latin America. In J. de la Mothe & G. Paquet (Eds.), Evolutionary Economics and the New International Political Economy (pp. 160–179). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Lundvall, B.-A. (Eds.). (1988). Small Countries Facing Technological Revolution. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2014). From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems Insights About Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualizing Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-Income Countries. European Journal of Development Research, 25, 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. (2007). Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry. Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1981). Essays in Trespassing. Economics to Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., & Andersen, A. D. (2012). Learning, Innovation and Inclusive Development. Globelics Thematic Report No 1, Denmark. Available at: http://vbn.aau.dk/files/70880770/Learning_Innovation_and_Inclusive_Development.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2017.

  • Judt, T. (2008). Reappraisals. Reflections on the Forgotten Twentieth Century. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., & Blankenburg, S. (2009). The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Asia and Latin America. In G. Dosi, M. Cimoli, & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation (pp. 336–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2016). Informal Economy in Developing Nations. Hidden Engine of Innovation? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E., & Valeyre, A. (2007). Organizational Forms and Innovative Performance: A Comparison of the EU-15. In E. Lorenz & B. A. Lundvalll (Eds.), How Europe’s Economies Learn. Coordinating Competing Models (pp. 227, 248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (1985). Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction (Industrial Development Research Series No. 31). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (1988). Innovation as an Interactive Process: from User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (2010). Postcript: Innovation System Research – Where It Comes from and Where It Might Go. In B. A. Lundvalll (Ed.), National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (pp. 317–366). London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (2016). Innovation Systems and Development: History, Theory and Challenges. In E. Reinert, J. Ghosh, & R. Kattel (Eds.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development (pp. 594–612). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (1997). The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy. Policy document of the Targeted Socio-Economic Research Program, European Commission, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2011). Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986). The Sources of Social Power, Vol. I, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power, Vol. II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2006). The Sources of Social Power Revisited: A Response to Criticism. In J. Hall & R. Schroeder (Eds.), An Anatomy of Power. The Social Theory of Michael Mann (pp. 343–396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2012). The Sources of Social Power, Vol. III (2012): Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2013a). The Sources of Social Power. Vol. IV Globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (2010). Inside the Public Scientific System: Changing Modes of Knowledge Production. In R. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, & P. Shapira (Eds.), The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy (pp. 25–50). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. (2009). The Roles of Research at Universities and Public Labs in Economic Catch-Up. In G. Dosi, M. Cimoli, & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Industrial Policy and Development. The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation (pp. 378–408). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (1990). The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2005). The Intellectual Origins of Modern Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic History, 65(2), 285–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. (2010). Befit for Change: Social Construction of Endogenous Technology in the South. FAU conference, Gjerrild.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation Systems. Cary: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Demand-Side Innovation Policies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, T. (2014). How Inclusive Can Innovation and Development Be in the Twenty-First Century? Innovation and Development, 4(2), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICYT. (2001). Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología. Standardisation of Indicators of Technological Innovation in Latin American and Caribbean Countries. BOGOTA MANUAL. Available at: http://www.ricyt.org/manuales/doc_view/149-bogota-manual. Accssed 10 May 2017.

  • Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, J. (Ed.). (1975). El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia – tecnología – desarrollo – dependencia. Buenos Aires: Editorial PAIDOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, J., & Botana, N. (1968). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la Integración 3 (Buenos Aires).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J., & Kanger, L. (2016). Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality. SPRU Working Papers, 2016–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H., Cooper, C., Desai, R. C., Freeman, C., Gish, O., Hill, S., & Oldham, G. (1970). The Sussex Manifesto: Science and Technology to Developing Countries During the Second Development Decade, IDS Reprints, 101. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, S. (2014). Demand and Innovation. Path Towards Inclusive Development. In S. Ramani (Ed.), Innovation in India: Combining Economic Growth with Inclusive Development (pp. 78–106). India: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sutz, J. (2012). Measuring Innovation in Developing Countries: Some Suggestions to Achieve More Accurate and Useful Indicators. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development (IJTLID), 5(1/2), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1998). The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (2014). America Inc.?: Innovation and Enterprise in the National Security State. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A System Failure Framework for Innovationpolicy Design. Technovation, 25, 609–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arocena, R., Göransson, B., Sutz, J. (2018). Social Processes of Learning and Innovation. In: Developmental Universities in Inclusive Innovation Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64152-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64152-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64152-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics