Communicating Europe? Berlusconi, Murdoch and the Interplay of National Politics and the Press



The interplay between Italian politics and the press—and its British counterpart—offers insights into the terrain which has created the basis for newspapers’ discursive constructions of Europe. A comparing and contrasting of the two cultures offers insights, challenging presuppositions about how politics and the media work in Britain and Italy. In the case of both Murdoch and Berlusconi, their pronouncements on the EU will provide some initial evidence of when they have left their imprint on those newspaper discourses. What is argued in this chapter is the extent to which the particularities of how news is produced, within these two cultures, impacts upon how Europe is conveyed and constructed. The influence of governments, journalists, editors and even owners is apparent.


Berlusconi Murdoch Advocacy Clientelism Party–press parallelism Professionalism Majoritarianism Instrumentalisation Pastone Common sense 


  1. Altick, R. 1957. The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public, 1800–1900. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, S., and E. Seymour. 2000. From Callaghan to Kosovo: Changing Trends in British Television News 1975–1999. Harrow, Middlesex: University of Westminster.Google Scholar
  3. BBC. 2002. Berlusconi Says Italy Backs EU. Accessed 15 June 2017.
  4. BBC. 2003. Labour ‘calm’ Over Murdoch Threat. Accessed 15 June 2017.
  5. BBC, Berlusconi. 2003. Berlusconi Goes Cool on the Euro. Accessed 15 June 2017.
  6. Belfield, R., C. Hird, and S. Kelly. 1991. Murdoch. The Decline of an Empire. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, G. 2003. British Values Can Help us shape a Europe for the 21st century. The Daily Telegraph, June 3.Google Scholar
  8. Curran, J., and C. Leys. 2000. Media and the Decline of Liberal Corporatism in Britain. In De-Westernizing Media Studies, ed. J. Curran, and M.J. Park, 221–236. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dardano, M. 1976. Il linguaggio dei giornali italiani. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  10. Dedman, M.J. 1996. The Origins and Development of the European Union, 1945–1995: A history of European Integration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. de Tocqueville, A. 1969. Democracy in America. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  12. Donsbach, W. 1995. Lapdogs, Watchdogs and Junkyard Dogs. Media Studies Journal 9 (4): 17–31.Google Scholar
  13. Donsbach, W., and T. Patterson. 1992. Journalists’ Roles and Newsroom Practices: A Cross-National Comparison. Paper Presented at the 42nd Conference of the International Communication Association, Miami.Google Scholar
  14. Forcella, E. 1959. Millecinquecento lettori, No. 6: Tempo Presente.Google Scholar
  15. Fossum, J.E., and P. Schlesinger. (eds.) 2007. The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Franklin, B., and J. Richardson. 2002. A Journalist’s Duty? Continuity and Change in Local Newspaper Reporting of Recent UK General Elections. Journalism Studies 3 (1): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser, N. 1992. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 109–143. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garton-Ash, T. 2005. Free World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Gifford, C. 2008. The Making of a Eurosceptic Britain. Identity and Economy in a Post-imperial State. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Ginzborg, P. 2003. Italy and Its Discontents. Family, Civil Society, State. 1980–2001. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Giordano, B. 2004. The Politics of the Northern League and Italy’s Changing Attitude Towards Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 5 (1): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenslade, R. 2002. Don’t Mention the Euro. The Guardian, May 20.Google Scholar
  23. Grice, A. 2006. Murdoch Set to Back Blair—For a Place in His Boardroom. The Independent, July 29.Google Scholar
  24. Hallin, D., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harding, J. 2002. Murdoch to Duel With Blair on Euro. The Financial Times, June 11, p. 30.Google Scholar
  26. Harcup, T., and D. O’Neill. 2001. What is News? Galtung and Ruge Revisited. Journalism Studies 2 (2): 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henningham, J., and A. Delano. 1998. British Journalists. In The Global Journalist: News People Around the World, ed. D.H. Weaver, 143–160. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hilton, A. 2016. Stay or Go—The Lack of Solid Facts Means It’s All a Leap of Faith. The Evening Standard, February 25.Google Scholar
  29. Høyer, S., and H. Pöttker. 2005. Diffusion of the News Paradigm 1850–2000. Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  30. Jackson, J. 2016. Sky Will Cost Murdoch $2.5bn Less After Brexit Vote. The Guardian, December 12.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, B., and N. Farrell. 2003. Forza Berlusconi! The Spectator, September 6, pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
  32. Lane, D. 2004. Berlusconi’s Shadow. Crime, Justice and the Pursuit of Power. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  33. Morgan, D. 1995. British Media and European Union News: The Brussels News Beat and Its Problems. European Journal of Communication 10 (3): 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owen, R. 2002. My Passion for Europe. The Times, January 14.Google Scholar
  35. Pansa, G. 1977. Comprati e venduti. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  36. Pizzorno, A. 1998. Il Potere dei Giudici. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  37. Poggioli, S. 1991. The media in Europe after 1992: A Case Study of La Repubblica. Politics and Public Policy. Discussion paper D-11. Cambridge, MA: Joan Shorenstein Barone Center on Press.Google Scholar
  38. Putnam, R. 1973. The Beliefs of Politicians: Ideology, Conflict and Democracy in Britain and Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rawnsley, A. 2001. Haven’t We Been Here Before? The Guardian, July 29.Google Scholar
  40. Roidi, V. 2001. La Fabbrica delle Notizie. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  41. Rosa, A. 1992. Dizionario della Letteratura italiana del novecento. Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  42. Ruzza, C. 2005. The Northern League: Winning Arguments, Losing Influence. In Movements of Exclusion: Radical Right-Wing Populism in the Western World, ed. J. Rydgren, 65–85. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  43. Sani, G. 2001. Mass Media ed Elezioni. Bologna: Mulino.Google Scholar
  44. Saul, H. 2016. Rupert Murdoch Gives His Verdict on ‘Wonderful’ Brexit. The Independent, June 29.Google Scholar
  45. Seymour-Ure, C. 1996. The British Press and Broadcasting since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Shawcross, W. 1992. Murdoch. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, A.C.H., Immirzi, E., and Blackwell, T. 1975. Paper Voices: The Popular Press and Social Change 1935–1965. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  48. Statham, P. 2008. Making Europe news. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 9 (4): 398–422.Google Scholar
  49. Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2004. Contemporary Euroscepticism in the Party Systems of the European Union Candidate States of Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 43: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ter Wal, J. 2002. Anti-Foreigner Campaigns in the Austrian Freedom Party and Italian Northern League: The Discursive Construction of Identity. In The Haider Phenomenon in Austria, ed. A. Pelinka, and R. Wodak, 157–176. London: Transaction.Google Scholar
  51. Trenz, HJ. 2007. Quo vadis Europe? Quality newspapers struggling for European unity. In The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making?, ed. J. E. Fossum and P. Schlesinger, 89–109. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Watson, T., and M. Hickman. 2012. Dial M for Murdoch. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  53. Weymouth, A., and Anderson, P. 1999. Insulting the Public? The British Press and the European Union. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BedfordshireLutonUK

Personalised recommendations