The Post-war European Project: A Topography Divorced from Nationhood



Britain and Italy have developed very different post-war trajectories, understanding Europe in divergent ways. Those collective memories resurface in newspaper articles, which often reaffirm a sense of nationhood—while quietly sidelining some Europe-related elements that do not suit the national narrative. That last draft of history, in newspapers, often reaffirms an understanding of the EU that the readership already hears—while other soundings grow muted. The post-war European project has never reconciled fully the competing positions on how to develop. Britain supports inter-governmentalism and co-operation—while Italy, traditionally at least federalist, seeks much closer union. And so competing notions of that Europe vie for attention in newspaper copy.


Nationhood Inter-governmentalism Federalism Integration Supranationalism Churchill De gaulle Monnet The euro Constitution 


  1. Bainbridge, T. 2000. The Penguin Companion to European Union. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Brinkley, D., and C. Hackett (eds.). 1991. Jean Monnet: The Path to European Unity. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Davies, N. 1997. Europe: A History. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, D. 2016. Media Coverage of the EU Referendum. Report 5. Loughborough: Loughborough University.Google Scholar
  5. Dedman, M.J. 1996. The Origins and Development of the European Union, 1945–95: A History of European Integration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Dinan, D. 1994. Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to the European Community. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  7. Forster, A. 2002. Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fossum, J.E., and P. Schlesinger (eds.). 2007. The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Garton-Ash, T. 2005. Free World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Gillingham, J. 1991. Jean Monnet and the European Coal and Steel Community: A Preliminary Appraisal. In Jean Monnet: The Path to European Unity, ed. D. Brinkley and C. Hackett, 134–135. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  11. Ginzborg, P. 2003. Italy and Its Discontents: Family, Civil Society, State. 1980–2001. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Haycraft, J. 1987. Italian Labyrinth. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Heer, H., and R. Wodak. 2008. Introduction: Collective Memory, National Narratives and the Politics of the Past. In The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annilihation, ed. H. Heer, W. Manoschek, A. Pollak and R. Wodak, 1–17, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  14. Judt, T. 2005. Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  15. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lipgens, W. (ed). 1980. Sources of the History of European Integration 1945–1955. London: Leyden.Google Scholar
  17. Lipgens, W. (ed.). 1985. Documents on the History of European Integration. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Musolff, A. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates About Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oberhuber, F., C. Bärenreuter, M. Krzyżanowski, H. Schönbauer, and R. Wodak. 2005. Debating the Constitution: On the Representations of Europe/The EU in the Press. Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 227–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oberhuber, F., and M. Krzyżanowski. 2007. (Un)Doing Europe. Discourses and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  21. Oberhuber, F., and M. Krzyżanowski. 2008. Discourse Analysis and Ethnography. In Qualitative Discourse Analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Krzyżanowski, 183–199. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  22. Onslow, S. 1997. Backbench Debate within the Conservative Party and Its Influence on British Foreign Policy, 1948–1974. Basingstoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Romero, F. 1993. Migration as an issue in European Interdependence and Integration. The Case of Italy. In The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory, ed. A. Milward, F. Lynch, F. Romero, R. Ranieri and V. Sorenson, 1945–1992. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Trenz, H.J. 2007. Quo vadis Europe? Quality Newspapers Struggling for European Unity. In The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? ed. J.E. Fossum and P. Schlesinger, 89–109. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BedfordshireLutonUK

Personalised recommendations