Abstract
An autonomous sweet pepper harvesting robot must perform several tasks to successfully harvest a fruit. Due to the highly unstructured environment in which the robot operates and the presence of occlusions, the current challenges are to improve the detection rate and lower the risk of losing sight of the fruit while approaching the fruit for harvest. Therefore, it is crucial to choose the best approach direction with least occlusion from obstacles.
The value of ideal information regarding the best approach direction was evaluated by comparing it to a method attempting several directions until successful harvesting is performed. A laboratory experiment was conducted on artificial sweet pepper plants using a system based on eye-in-hand configuration comprising a 6DOF robotic manipulator equipped with an RGB camera. The performance is evaluated in laboratorial conditions using both descriptive statistics of the average harvesting times and harvesting success as well as regression models. The results show roughly 40–45% increase in average harvest time when no a-priori information of the correct harvesting direction is available with a nearly linear increase in overall harvesting time for each failed harvesting attempt. The variability of the harvesting times grows with the number of approaches required, causing lower ability to predict them.
Tests show that occlusion of the front of the peppers significantly impacts the harvesting times. The major reason for this is the limited workspace of the robot often making the paths to positions to the side of the peppers significantly longer than to positions in front of the fruit which is more open.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Comba, L., Gay, P., Piccarolo, P., Ricauda Aimonino, D.: Robotics and automation for crop management: trends and perspective. In: International Conference Ragusa SHWA 2010, pp. 471–478 (2010)
Bac, C.W.: Improving obstacle awareness for robotic harvesting of sweet-pepper (2015)
Bac, C.W., Henten, E.J., Hemming, J., Edan, Y.: Harvesting robots for high-value crops: state-of-the-art review and challenges ahead. J. F. Robot. 31, 888–911 (2014)
Edan, Y., Flash, T., Peiper, U.M., Shmulevich, I., Sarig, Y.: Near-minimum-time task planning for fruit-picking robots. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7, 48–56 (1991)
Harel, B., Kurtser, P., Van Herck, L., Parmet, Y., Edan, Y.: Sweet pepper maturity evaluation via multiple viewpoints color analyses. In: CIGR-AgEng Conference (2016)
Hemming, J., Ruizendaal, J., Hofstee, J.W., van Henten, E.J.: Fruit detectability analysis for different camera positions in sweet-pepper. Sensors 14, 6032–6044 (2014)
Gongal, A., Amatya, S., Karkee, M., Zhang, Q., Lewis, K.: Sensors and systems for fruit detection and localization: a review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 116, 8–19 (2015)
Vitzrabin, E., Edan, Y.: Adaptive thresholding with fusion using a RGBD sensor for red sweet-pepper detection. Biosyst. Eng. 146, 45–56 (2016)
Rosenbaum, D.A., Cohen, R.G., Meulenbroek, R.G.J., Vaughan, J.: Plans for grasping objects. In: Motor Control and Learning, pp. 9–25. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2006)
Eizicovits, D., Berman, S.: Efficient sensory-grounded grasp pose quality mapping for gripper design and online grasp planning. Rob. Auton. Syst. 62, 1208–1219 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.03.011
Eizicovits, D., van Tuijl, B., Berman, S., Edan, Y.: Integration of perception capabilities in gripper design using graspability maps. Biosyst. Eng. 146, 98–113 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.12.016
Kapach, K., Barnea, E., Mairon, R., Edan, Y., Ben-Shahar, O.: Computer vision for fruit harvesting robots–state of the art and challenges ahead. Int. J. Comput. Vis. Robot. 3, 4–34 (2012)
Barth, R., Hemming, J., van Henten, E.J.: Design of an eye-in-hand sensing and servo control framework for harvesting robotics in dense vegetation. Biosyst. Eng. 146, 71–84 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.12.001
Hellström, T., Ringdahl, O.: A software framework for agricultural and forestry robots. Ind. Robot. Int. J. 40, 20–26 (2013). doi:10.1108/01439911311294228
Ringdahl, O., Kurtser, P., Barth, R., Edan, Y.: Operational flow of an autonomous sweet pepper harvesting robot. In: The 5th Israeli Conference on Robotics 2016, Air Force Conference Center Hertzilya, Israel, 13–14 April 2016
Benoit, K.: Linear regression models with logarithmic transformations. London School of Economics, London (2011)
Greenwood, P.E., Nikulin, M.S.: A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996)
Acknowledgments
This research was partially supported by the European Commission (SWEEPER GA no. 66313), by the Helmsley Charitable Trust through the Agricultural, Biological and Cognitive Robotics Center, and by the Rabbi W. Gunther Plaut Chair in Manufacturing Engineering, both at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. The authors would like to acknowledge Peter Hohnloser at Computing Science department, Umeå University for his significant support and implementation of parts of the software system used in this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ringdahl, O., Kurtser, P., Edan, Y. (2017). Strategies for Selecting Best Approach Direction for a Sweet-Pepper Harvesting Robot. In: Gao, Y., Fallah, S., Jin, Y., Lekakou, C. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64106-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64107-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)