Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

General Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU International Agreements

  • 418 Accesses

Abstract

This research aimed to provide an analysis of the institutional and legal effects of international agreements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Court had consistently refused to recognise the direct effect of GATT rules. See Joined Cases 21 to 24/72 International Fruit Company NV and others v Produktschap voor Groenten en Fruit EU:C:1972:115, [1972] ECR 1219, para 27; Case C-280/93 Germany v Council EU:C:1994:367, [1994] ECR I-4973, para 110.

  2. 2.

    Case C-149/96 Portugal v Council EU:C:1999:574, [1999] ECR I-8395, para 48.

  3. 3.

    Case 70/87 Fediol v Commission EU:C:1989:254, [1989] ECR 1781.

  4. 4.

    Case C-69/89 Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council EU:C:1991:186, [1991] ECR I-2069.

  5. 5.

    Case C-149/96 Portugal v Council EU:C:1999:574, [1999] ECR I-8395.

  6. 6.

    E.g. The Commission made a request to the CJEU for an Opinion according to Article 218 (11) TFEU on the compatibility of the draft agreement providing for the accession of the European Union to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms with the EU legal order (Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR EU:C:2014:2454).

  7. 7.

    Case C-61/94 Commission v Germany EU:C:1996:313, [1996] ECR I-3989.

  8. 8.

    Case C-327/91 France v Commission EU:C:1994:305, [1994] ECR I-3641.

  9. 9.

    Case C-360/93 Parliament v Council EU:C:1996:84, [1996] ECR I-1195.

  10. 10.

    Case C-268/94 Portugal v Council EU:C:1996:461, [1996] ECR I-6177.

  11. 11.

    Case C-189/97 Parliament v Council EU:C:1999:366, [1999] ECR I-4741.

  12. 12.

    Case C-36/98 Spain v Council EU:C:2001:64, [2001] ECR I-779.

  13. 13.

    Case C-281/01 Commission v Council EU:C:2002:761, [2002] ECR I-12049.

  14. 14.

    Case C-211/01 Commission v Council EU:C:2003:452, [2003] ECR I-8913.

  15. 15.

    Case C-94/03 Commission v Council EU:C:2006:2, [2006] ECR I-1.

  16. 16.

    Joined Cases C-317/04 and C-318/04 Parliament v Council and Commission (PNR) EU:C:2006:346, [2006] ECR I-4721.

  17. 17.

    Case C-280/93 Germany v Council EU:C:1994:367, [1994] ECR I-4973.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK

    Nadine Zipperle

Authors
  1. Nadine Zipperle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zipperle, N. (2017). General Conclusion. In: EU International Agreements. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64078-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64078-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64077-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64078-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation