Advertisement

Calming the Waters, Ploughing the Sea – Can Gender-Responsive Approaches to Intra-state Water Conflicts Lead to Peacebuilding? Evidence from Lebanon and Nepal

  • Henri MyrttinenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Water Security in a New World book series (WSEC)

Abstract

Access to water, among other resources, has been and continues to be an implicit or explicit driver of intra-state conflict, and both access to water and conflicts are intimately linked to gendered power dynamics in any given society. While water as a conflict driver and the gendered nature of conflict have received relatively extensive attention from academics, policy-makers as well as practitioners of peacebuilding, the more positive approaches of using water and/or gender relations as entry points to conflict transformation and societally inclusive peacebuilding have been less researched. Drawing on case study examples from Nepal and Lebanon, the chapter explores some of the possibilities, necessary conditions and challenges of gender-responsive peacebuilding in the context of intra-state water conflicts.

Keywords

Gender Peacebuilding Nepal Lebanon Intersectionality 

Bibliography

  1. Anwar N, Mustafa D, Sawas A, Malik S (2016) Gender and violence in urban Pakistan. Institute of Business Administration Karachi and King’s College London, Karachi/LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Banfield J, Stamadianou V (eds) (2015) Towards a peace economy in Lebanon. International Alert, BeirutGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont P (1997) Water and armed conflict in the middle east—fantasy or reality? In: Gleditsch NP (ed) Conflict and the environment. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekdache N (2015) Resilience in the face of crisis – rooting resilience in the realities of Lebanese experience. International Alert, BeirutGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun Y (2011) Left high and dry – an intersectional analysis of gender, dams and development in Lesotho. Int Fem J Polit 13(2):141–162. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2011.560037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cano M (2015) Gender audit of the peace, security and cooperation framework for the democratic republic of congo and the region. International Alert/Kvinna till Kvinna, GomaGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter RC (2006) Recognizing gender-based violence against civilian men and boys in conflict situations. Secur Dialogue 37(1):83–103. doi: 10.1177/0967010606064139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chellaney B (2013) Water, peace, and war: confronting the global water crisis. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheria A (2005) Liberation is not enough: the kamaiya movement in Nepal. ActionAid Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohn C (2012) Women and wars: toward a conceptual framework. In: Cohn C (ed) Women & Wars. Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  11. Conciliation Resources (2015) Women and peace processes. Conciliation Resources, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Coulter C (2008) Bush wives and girl soldiers – women’s lives through war and peace in Sierra Leone. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  13. Debusscher P, Martín De Almagro M (2016) Post-conflict women’s movements in turmoil: the challenges of success in Liberia in the 2005-aftermath. J Modern Afr Stud 54(2):293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolan C (2014) Letting go of the gender binary: Charting new pathways for humanitarian interventions on gender-based violence. Int Rev Red Cross 96(894):485–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dominey-Howes D, Gorman-Murray A, McKinnon S (2014) Queering disasters: on the need to account for LGBTI experiences in natural disaster contexts. Gender Place Culture: J Fem Geogr 21(7):905–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. El-Bushra J (2007) Feminism, gender, and women’s peace activism. Dev Change 38(1):131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El-Masri R, Harvey C, Garwood R (2013) Shifting sands – changing gender roles among refugees in Lebanon. Abaad/Oxfam, BeirutGoogle Scholar
  18. Fröhlich C (2012) Water: reason for conflict or catalyst for peace? the case of the Middle East. L’Europe en Formation 3 (n° 365), 139–161. doi:  10.3917/eufor.365.0139
  19. Fröhlich C (2016) Climate migrants as protestors? Dispelling misconceptions about global environmental change in pre-revolutionary Syria. Contemp Levant 1(1):38–50. doi: 10.1080/20581831.2016.1149355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goulet D (2005) Global governance, dam conflicts, and participation. Hum Rights Q 27(3):881–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Homer-Dixon T, Boutwell J, Rathjens G (1993) Environmental change and violent conflict. Sci Am 1993:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. International Alert (2010) Programming framework for International Alert: design, monitoring and evaluation. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. International Rescue Committee (2016) Vulnerability assessment of Syrian refugee men in Lebanon – investigating protection gaps, needs and responses relevant to single and working Syrian refugee men in Lebanon. IRC, BeirutGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson M (2001) All honourable men: the social origins of war in Lebanon. I.B. Tauris, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Khalili L (2007) Heroes and Martyrs of Palestine: the politics of national commemoration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khattab L (2016) State-citizens relations in Lebanon through the lens of domestic violence and gender issues. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Khattab L, Myrttinen H (2014) Gender, security and SSR in Lebanon. International Alert, BeirutGoogle Scholar
  28. Khattab L, Myrttinen H (2017) “Most of the men want to leave” – armed groups, displacement and the gendered webs of vulnerability in Syria. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin M (2014) An intimate war: an oral history of the helmand conflict. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Maycock M (2012) Masculinity, modernity and bonded labour: Continuity and change amongst the Kamaiya of Kailali district, Far-West Nepal. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  31. Maycock M, Sharma J, Brethfeld J, Shah O, Shrestha R (2014) “How can you be a marda if you beat your wife?” Notions of masculinities and violence in Eastern Nepal. Saferworld, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Mehta L, Srinivasan B (2001) Balancing pains and gains. a perspective paper on gender and large dams, WCD thematic review 1.1 (b). World Commission on Dams, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  33. Mirumachi N, Allan JA (2007) Revisiting transboundary water governance: power, conflict, cooperation and the political economy. CAIWA conference paper. http://www.newater.uni-osnabrueck.de/caiwa/data/papers%20session/F3/CAIWA-FullPaper-MirumachiAllan25Oct07submitted2.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2017
  34. Mustafa D, Gioli G, Qazi S, Waraich R, Rehman A, Zahoor R (2015) Gendering flood early warning systems: the case of Pakistan. Environ Hazards 14:312–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Myrttinen H, Naujoks J, El-Bushra J (2014) Re-thinking gender in peacebuilding. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Myrttinen H, Naujoks J, Schilling J (2015) Gender, Natural Resources, and Peacebuilding in Kenya and Nepal. Peace Rev J Soc Justice. doi: 10.1080/10402659.2015.1037623
  37. Myrttinen H, Khattab L, Maydaa C (2017) “Trust no one, beware of everyone” – Vulnerabilities of LGBTI refugees in Lebanon. In: Freedman J, Kivilcim Z, Baklacıoğlu N (eds) A gendered approach to the Syrian refugee crisis. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Naujoks J (2016) Building back better or restoring inequalities? – gender and conflict sensitivity in the response to Nepal’s 2015 earthquakes. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Naujoks J, Myrttinen H (2014) Re-assessing gender norms after conflict – gender in peacebuilding in Nepal. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Pandey N, Myrttinen H (2014) Peace audit Nepal – infrastructure, participation, peacebuilding in Panchthar and Kailali. Unpublished report. International Alert, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  41. Rehn E, Johnson Sirleaf E (2002) Women, war and peace: the independent experts’ assessment on the impact of armed conflict on women and women’s role in peace-building. UNIFEM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards G (2010) Queering Katrina: gay discourses of the disaster in New Orleans. J Am Stud 44:519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Selby J, Dahi O, Fröhlich C, Hulme M (Forthcoming) Climate change and the syrian civil war revisited. Polit GeogrGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharma J, Donini A (2010) Towards a “Great Transformation?” The maoist insurgency and local perceptions of social transformation in Nepal. Feinstein International Center, SomervilleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharma M, Tamang S (eds) (2016) A difficult transition: the Nepal papers. Zubaan, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  46. Shrestha-Schipper S (2009) Women’s participation in the people’s war in Jumla. Eur Bull Himal Res 33–34:105–122Google Scholar
  47. Stephen M (2014) Fragile reforms – World Bank and Asian Development Bank financing in Fragile and conflict-affected situations. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Sugden F, de Silva S, Clement F, Maskey-Amatya N, Ramesh V, Philip A, Bharati L (2014) A framework to understand gender and structural vulnerability to climate change in the Ganges River Basin: lessons from Bangladesh, India and Nepal, IWMI working paper 2014 No.159. International Water Management Institute, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  49. Suhardiman D, Clement F, Bharati L (2015) Integrated water resources management in Nepal: key stakeholders’ perceptions and lessons learned. Int J Water Resour Dev 31(2):284–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Syria Research, Evaluation Organization (2013) Rupture, remembrance, resiliency: the impact of displacement on Syrian women refugees in Turkey. SREO, GaziantepGoogle Scholar
  51. Tamang S (2002) The politics of developing Nepali women. In: Dixit KM, Ramachandran S (eds) State of Nepal. Himal Books, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  52. Turner L (2016) Are Syrian men vulnerable too? Gendering The Syria refugee response. Middle East Institute, November 29, 2016. http://www.mei.edu/content/map/are-syrian-men-vulnerable-too-gendering-syria-refugee-response. Accessed 22 May 2016
  53. UNRCHCO (2011) Chaupadi in the far west. Field Bulletin. Vol. 1. UNRCHCO, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  54. UNRCHCO (2013) An overview of Tharu mobilisations. Field Bulletin, Vol. 54. UNRCHCO, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  55. Utas M (2005) Victimcy, girlfriending, soldiering: tactic agency in a young woman’s social navigation of the Liberian war zone. Anthropol Q 78(2):403–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Väyrynen T (2010) Gender and Peacebuilding. In: Richmond O (ed) Palgrave advances in peacebuilding – critical developments and approaches. Palgrave, London, pp 137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Verma SC (2009) Amazing Tharu women: empowered and in control. Intersections: gender and sexuality in Asia and the Pacific, vol 22. Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolf AT (1998) Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy 1(2):251–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolf AT (2004) Regional water cooperation as confidence building: water management as a strategy for peace. Adelphi Research, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolf AT, Kramer A, Carius A, Dabelko GD (2005) Managing water conflict and cooperation. In: Assadourian E, Brown L, Carius A, Cincotta R, Conca K, Dabelko G, Flavin C, French H, Gardner G, Halweil B, Kramer A, Mastny L, Nierenberg D, Pirages D, Prugh T, Renner M, Sawin J, Starke L, Wolf A (eds) The Worldwatch Institute 2005 state of the world report – redefining global security. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, pp 80–95Google Scholar
  61. World Bank (2013) Lebanon economic and social impact assessment of the Syrian conflict. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright H (2014) Masculinities, conflict and peacebuilding: perspectives on men through a gender lens. Saferworld, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Zeitoun M, Mirumachi N (2008) Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. Int Environ Agreements 8:297. doi: 10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zwarteveen M (2006) Wedlock or deadlock? Feminists’ attempts to engage irrigation engineers. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International AlertLondonUK

Personalised recommendations