Skip to main content

Virtual Reality as a Travel Promotional Tool: Insights from a Consumer Travel Fair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

Although the potential of virtual reality (VR) as a technology in tourism has been recognised for more than twenty years, (Horan, Hosp Inf Technol Assoc—Electron J 1:1–7, 1996; Williams and Hobson, Tourism Manage 16:423–427, 1995), we have witnessed a renewed interest in both academic and business circles recently (Jung et al., Information and communication technologies in tourism 621–635, 2016). From a marketing perspective, VR offers the potential to build a sensory experience of a tourism destination or attraction, and can be used in sales contexts to complement, or indeed, supplant traditional promotional tools such as brochures. The immersive nature of the experience offers a deeper and more emotional assessment of the tourist offering from the consumer’s perspective, and an opportunity to build imagery and influence the consumer decision-making process from the marketing communicator’s viewpoint. Research was conducted into consumers’ attitudes and experiences of 360-degree VR videos, which have been developed by Fáilte Ireland (Ireland’s domestic marketing and product development agency) to showcase a number of activities along the Wild Atlantic Way. Using a quantitative research approach constructed along the dimensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, MIS quarterly 319–335, 1989), 129 surveys were carried out at two consumer travel shows. Respondents’ VR experience was rated positively across all demographic cohorts and against the selected dimensions of the TAM model. Using VR to promote the Wild Atlantic Way was found to greatly increase the likelihood of visiting the destination itself in the future. This offers very encouraging prospects for destination marketers. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how VR can aid in destination marketing and promotion, and potential limitations to its wider deployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson, A. (2015). Virtual reality: Not right for all marketers, but brilliant for marriott, forbes. Retrieved March, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/allenadamson/2015/11/17/virtual-reality-not-right-for-all-marketers-but-brilliant-for-marriott/#588fece7683a.

  • Anglim, D. (2016). Virtual reality brings wild Atlantic way to life. Retrieved March, 2017, from http://www.Fáilteireland.ie/Utility/News-Library/Virtual-Reality-Brings-Wild-Atlantic-Way-to-Life.aspx.

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, H., Dittenbach, M., Merkl, D., Bogdanovych, A., Simoff, S., & Sierra, C. (2007). Opening new dimensions for e-tourism. Journal of the Virtual Reality Society, 11(2–3), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21(1), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2008). Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the internet-the state of eTourism research. Tourism Management, 29(4), 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabello, J., Collado, A., Cruz-Lara, S., Armisen, A., Franco, J., Janer, J., Oyarzun, D. & Geraerts, R. (2011). Standards in virtual worlds. Virtual travel use case metaverse1 project. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 4(3), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, R. (1995). The virtual threat to travel and tourism. Tourism Management, 16(6), 417–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D., Defanti, T., Kenyon, R., & Hart, J. (1994). The cave: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Communications of the ACM, 35(6), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • eMarketer.com (2015). Marriott’s virtual reality transports guests ‘Around the World’. Retrieved March, 2017, from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Marriotts-Virtual-Reality-Transports-Guests-Around-World/1013409.

  • Fáilte Ireland (2016). Virtual reality brings wild atlantic way to life. Retrieved, March, 2017, from http://www.Fáilteireland.ie/Utility/News-Library/Virtual-Reality-Brings-Wild-Atlantic-Way-to-Life.aspx.

  • Giordimaina, J. G. (2008). Multi sensory marketing and its application in tourism. Journal of the Institute of Tourism Studies, 1(2), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman Sachs (2016). Equity Research. Retrieved March 2017, from http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/pages/technology-driving-innovation-folder/virtual-and-augmented-reality/report.pdf.

  • Gratzer, M., Werthner, H., & Winiwarter, W. (2004). Electronic business in tourism. International Journal of Electronic Business, 2(5), 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gretzel, U. & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2003). Experience-based internet marketing: An exploratory study of sensory experiences associated with pleasure travel to the Midwest United States, Proceedings of International Federation for Information Technology and Travel and Tourism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, J., Pinto, M., & Beato, C. (2015). Virtual reality shows. A new vision for tourism and heritage. Retrieved March, 2017, from http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/10/best-vr-deadset-2016-psvr-rift-vive.

  • Gutiérrez, M., Vexo, F., & Thalmann, D. (2008). Stepping into virtual reality. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guttentag, D. (2010). Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management, 31(5), 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horan, P. (1996). Virtual reality applications in the hospitality/tourism industry, Hospitality Information Technology Association—Electronic Journal, 1:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Backman, S., Backman, K., & Moore, D. (2013). Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Tourism Management, 36, 490–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, M. Y., & O’Keeffe, R. M. (2012). Virtual destination image: Testing a telepresence model. Journal of Business Research, 65, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobious, P. (2016). Virtual reality in tourism. Retrieved March, 2017, from http://www.virtual-reality-in-tourism.com/.

  • Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. C., Lee, H. & Chung, N. (2016). Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museums. In A. Inversini & R. Schegg (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism, (621–635). Wien: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Harris, L., & Piercy, N. (2017). Principles of marketing. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-Y., Park, J., & Morrison, A. (2008). A model of traveller acceptance mobile technology. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10, 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, E. C. (2011). Recommendations from a virtual community as a catalytic agent of travel decisions. Internet Research, 21(3), 282–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, E. C. S., & Chen, C. (2015). Cultivating travellers’ revisit intention to e-tourism service: The moderating effect of website interactivity. Behaviour and Information Technology, 34(5), 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S., Schuckert, M., Law, R., & Masiero, L. (2016). The relevance of mobile tourism and information technology: An analysis of recent trends and future research directions, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. (2010). Examining e-travel sites: An empirical study in Taiwan. Online Information Review, 34(2), 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levere, J. (2017). Before you take the trip: How about a virtual ‘test drive’? The New York Times. Retrieved March, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/12/business/media/travel-virtual-reality.html?_r=0.

  • Mair, J. (2010). A review of business events literature 2000–2009. Leeds: Paper presented at the global events congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56, 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascho, E., & Singh, N. (2013). Virtual tourism: Use of “Second Life” for destination marketing. Anatolia, 25(1), 140–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, L. (2009). Consumer behaviour at an industrial travel show. Tourism Review, 64(4), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motwani, J., Rice, G., & Mahmoud, E. (1992). Promoting exports through international trade shows, a dual perspective. Review of Business, 13(4), 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B., & Gilmore, J. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizam, A. (1990). Evaluating the effectiveness of travel trade shows and other tourism sales promotion techniques. Journal of Travel Research, 29(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priceline (2016). Intersection of technology and consumer experiences. Retrieved March, 2017, from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-survey-from-the-priceline-group-reveals-insights-into-how-travelers-expect-technology-to-transform-experiences-300282329.html.

  • Reinhard, C. (2010). Interviews within experimental frameworks: How to make sense of sense-making in virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 3(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughead M. (2017). Scotland transposed to VR in effort to lure tech-savvy visitor. Retrieved March, 2017, from http://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/03/07/scotland-transposed-vr-effort-lure-tech-savvy-visitors.

  • Sanchez-Vives, M., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahli, A. B., & Legoherel, P. (2015). The tourism web acceptance model: A study of intention to book tourism products online. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 22(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, W., & Craig, A. (2003). Understanding virtual reality. Interface, application and design. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., & Gallace, A. (2011). Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychology & Marketing, 28, 267–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamboulis, Y., & Skayannis, P. (2003). Innovation strategies and technology or experience-based tourism. Tourism Management, 24(1), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, H. (2016). The Debate about whether 360 video is VR- and Why it Doesn’t Matter. Retrieved March, 2017, from https://www.virtualreality-news.net/news/2016/sep/14/debate-about-whether-360-video-vr-and-why-it-doesnt-matter/.

  • Sussmann, S., & Vanhegan, H. (2000). Virtual reality and the tourism product. Substitution or complement? Retrieved March, 2017, from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2000/117.

  • Ukpabi, D. & Karjaluoto, H. (2016). Consumers’ acceptance of information and communications technology in tourism: A review. Telematics and Informatics, (article in press, forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, C., Tsaur, S., Chiu, Y., & Chiou, W. (2007). Is the advertising effect of virtual experience better or contingent on different travel destinations? Information Technology and Tourism, 9(1), 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Qualls, W. (2007). Towards a theoretical model of technology adoption in hospitality organizations. Hospitality Management, 26, 560–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., & Hobson, J. S. (1995). Virtual reality and tourism: Fact or fantasy? Tourism Management, 16(6), 423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltshier, P., & Clarke, A. (2015). Virtual cultural tourism: Six pillars of VCT using co-creation, value exchange and exchange value. Paper presented at the Tourism and Hospitality Research, TPPP conference, Eastbourne, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of Fáilte Ireland in this research, and the assistance of Holiday World organisers in facilitating the research at their 2017 shows

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Gibson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibson, A., O’Rawe, M. (2018). Virtual Reality as a Travel Promotional Tool: Insights from a Consumer Travel Fair. In: Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. (eds) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics