Abstract
The notion of cosmopolitanism understood as a law that acknowledges the right of the individual to become an active citizen of the world, with the means necessary to the exercise of the subject’s freedom and to decide on common matters of public nature both at the local and the global level, is today better reflected in the work of Thomas Pogge, Paula Casal, and Hillel Steiner. Their studies on global justice, and on what is owned to the individual independently of his community of origin, make of their thought one inheritor of Kantian’s cosmopolitanism. It is through their proposals, together with a reflection on Kant’s specific conception of cosmopolitanism, that some of the most pressing matters of international politics today, as that of migration, can be addressed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Foreigners. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Archibugi, Daniele. 1998. Principles of Cosmopolitan Democracy. In Reimagining Political Comunity: In Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy, ed. Daniele Archibugi, David Held and Martin Köhler. 198–228. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Archibugi, Daniele, and David Held. 1995. Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beitz, Charles R. 1999. Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism. International Affairs 75: 347–377.
Beitz, Charles. 2000. Political Theory and International Relations, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princenton University Press.
Callinicos, Alex. 2003. An Anti-capitalist Manifesto. Cambridge: Polity.
Casal, Paula. 2011. Global Taxes on Natural Resources. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8: 307–327.
———. 2015. Progressive Environmental Taxes. In Cosmopolitanism: Between Ideals and Reality, ed. Lorena Cebolla and Francesco Ghia, 172–179. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Cheah, Pheng, and Bruce Robbins (eds.). 1998. Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Douzinas, Costas. 2007. Human Rights and Empire: The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. Abingdon: Routledge Cavendish.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Falk, Richard, and Andrew Strauss. 2001. Toward Global Parliament. Foreign Affairs 80 (1): 212–220.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. The Inclusion of the Other. Oxford: Blackwell.
Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals, Realities & Deficits. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Navarro, Vicente. 2000. Development and Quality of Life: A Critique of Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom. International Journal of Health Services 30 (4): 661–674.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1994. Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism. Boston Review 19: 5.
Pogge, Thomas. 2001. Eradicating Systemic Poverty: Brief for a Global Resources Dividend. Journal of Human Development 2 (1): 59–77.
———. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———. 2006. Do Rawls’s Two Theories of Justice Fit Together? In Rawls’s Law of Peoples. A Realistic Utopia? ed. Rex Martin and David Reidy, 206–225. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 2011. Allowing the Poor to Share the Earth. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8: 335–352.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1993. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shue, Henry. 1980. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence an U.S Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, Affluence and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (1): 229–243.
Steiner, Hillel. 1994. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1999. Just Taxation and International Redistribution. Nomos 39: 171–191.
———. 2011. The Global Fund: A Reply to Casal. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8: 328–334.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2000. What is Cosmopolitan? The Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 227–243.
Wolff, Robert P. 1977. Understanding Rawls: A Critique and Reconstruction of a Theory of Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zizek, Slavoj. 1999. The Ticklish Subject. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sanahuja, L.C. (2017). Conclusion. In: Toward Kantian Cosmopolitanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63988-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63988-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63987-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63988-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)