Advertisement

What Is the Harmony Approach?

  • Xiaoyu Yuan
Chapter
  • 184 Downloads
Part of the Springer Series on Asian Criminology and Criminal Justice Research book series (SSACCJR)

Abstract

Chinese people, like their Western counterparts, are unfamiliar with terms such as “restorative justice” or “repairing the harm.” Nevertheless, they are probably one of the most largely populated nations in the world that has embraced both the ideas and practices of mediation. Resolving conflict through mediation is currently a practice across the criminal justice spectrum. Although it might be overshadowed by this study’s singular focus on mediation practices in the field, the fact is that various mediation practices are taking place throughout the punishment-based justice system. The story is fundamentally about repairing harm in the Chinese societal and legal landscape. This chapter explains why it is “about repairing the harm” and why I view it in this way.

Keywords

Harmonious Approach Mediation Practice Offenders Authoritarian Approach Apologetic Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Burnside, J., & Baker, N. (2003). Relational justice: Repairing the breach. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, G. M. (2002). The impact of harmony on Chinese conflict management. In G. Chen & R. Ma (Eds.), Chinese conflict management and resolution (pp. 3–17). Westport, CT/London: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, R. (2006). The victim-offender collaboration model in criminal proceedings: The emergence of criminal mediation in China [xingshi susong de sili hezuo moshi: xingshi hejie zai zhongguo de xingqi]. Chinese Legal Science, 2006(5), 15–30.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, R. (2011). Initial research on the malfunctions of the criminal process. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 20, 359.Google Scholar
  5. Foote, D. H. (1992). The benevolent paternalism of Japanese criminal justice. California Law Review, 80(2), 317–390. doi: 10.2307/3480769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fu, J. (2013). Freedom of contract in the EU and China. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 8, 274.Google Scholar
  7. Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  8. Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61(5), 420–424. doi: 10.2307/2773484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garland, D. (2013). Penality and the penal state. Criminology, 51(3), 475–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths, J. (1970). Ideology in criminal procedure or a third “model” of the criminal process. The Yale Law Journal, 79(3), 359–417. doi: 10.2307/795141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton, G. G. (1990). Patriarchy, patrimonialism, and filial piety: A comparison of China and Western Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 77–104. doi: 10.2307/591019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsü, F. L. (1970). Americans and Chinese: Purpose and fulfillment in great civilizations. Garden City, NY: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  13. Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concepts of “face”. American Anthropologist, 46(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of restorative justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Liu, J., Zhao, R., Xiong, H., & Gong, J. (2012). Chinese legal traditions: Punitiveness versus mercy. Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice, 9(1), 17–33.Google Scholar
  16. Llewellyn, J. (2008). Bridging the gap between truth and reconciliation: Restorative justice and the Indian Residential School Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In M. B. Castellano, L. Archibald, & M. DeGagne (Eds.), From truth to reconciliation: Transforming the legacy of residential schools (p. 183). Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Llewellyn, J., & Howse, R. L. (1999). Restorative justice: A conceptual framework. Prepared for the Law Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Nader, L. (1990). Harmony ideology: Justice and control in a Zapotec mountain village. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pye, L. W. (1996). The state and the individual: An overview interpretation. In B. Hook (Ed.), The individual and the state in China (pp. 16–42). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pye, M. W., & Pye, L. W. (1985). Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Stacey, J. (1983). Patriarchy and socialist revolution in China. Berkeley, CA/Los Angeles, CA/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang, M. M.-h. (1994). Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Zhai, X. (2011). Perspectives on Chinese “face”: Psychological motives and social representations [zhongguoren de lianmian guan: xingshi zhuyi de xinli dongyin yu shehui biaozheng]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoyu Yuan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeShanghai University of Political Science and LawShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations