Advertisement

Criminal Mediation in the Chinese Criminal Justice Context

  • Xiaoyu Yuan
Chapter
  • 185 Downloads
Part of the Springer Series on Asian Criminology and Criminal Justice Research book series (SSACCJR)

Abstract

As China advances its modernization process, the power to impose criminal penalties has become the monopoly of the state. Nevertheless, mediation, as a conflict resolution method, has not disappeared from the modern Chinese criminal justice system. In this chapter, we highlight the criminal justice system within which criminal mediation has been situated. This includes a general introduction of the criminal legislation concerning mediation, as well as the mediation practices that have been reported so far. Special attention will be given to the latter, calibrating the research and summarizing the pitfalls in practice, as well as the gaps in the literature.

References

  1. Belkin, I. (2000). China’s criminal justice system: A work in progress. Washington Journal of Modern China, 6(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  2. Berti, R. (2011). The Xingshi Hejie: Criminal concliation in Mainland China and in Taiwan. Paper presented at the ACS (Asian criminological society) third annual conference, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  3. Di, X. (2008). Justifying restorative juvenile justice [huifuxing shaonian xingshi sifa de zhengyixing tanxi]. Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency, 2008(2), 4–11.Google Scholar
  4. Feng, L. Q., & Cui, Y. (2008). Experience and problems with victim-offender mediation: Investigation on victim-offender mediation status quo of Chaoyang District of Beijing [xingshi hejie de jingyan yu wenti—dui Beijing shi chaoyang qu xingshi hejie xianzhuang de tiaocha]. China Criminal Justice Magazine, 2008(1), 108–115.Google Scholar
  5. Leheny, D., & Liu, S. (2010). The politics of crime, punishment, and social order in East Asia. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 239–258. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu, J., & Palermo, G. B. (2009). Restorative justice and Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice, 7(1), 49–68.Google Scholar
  7. Liu, P., & Situ, Y. (2001). Mixing inquisitorial and adversarial models: Changes in criminal procedure in a changing China. In J. Liu, L. Zhang, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), Crime and social control in a changing China (pp. 133–150). Westport/London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  8. Liu, Z., & Xiao, H. (2007). Criminal reconciliation: Local construction of restorative justice [xingshi hejie: huifuxing sifa de bentuhua goujian]. Journal of Liaoning Administrators’ College of Police and Justice, 2007, 20–23.Google Scholar
  9. National People’s Congress. (1997). Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.Google Scholar
  10. Qian, C. (2009). Several urgent issues for the practices of criminal reconciliation [xingshi hejie zai sifa shijian zhong jidai jiejue de jige wenti]. In Y. H. Song & J. Yuan (Eds.), Theory and practice of criminal reconciliation in China (pp. 169–174). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Shi, L. (2007). Criminal reconciliation: The “third realm” of criminal dispute settlement [xingshi hejie: xingshi jiufen jiejue de disan lingyu]. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 25(6), 80–88.Google Scholar
  12. Song, Y., Guo, Y., Li, Z., Luo, H., He, T., Xiang, Y., et al. (2009). Empirical study on criminal Mediaiton in public prosecution cases [gongsu anjian xingshi hejie shizheng yanjiu]. Chinese Journal of Law, 3, 3–22.Google Scholar
  13. Song, Y., & Yuan, J. (Eds.). (2009). Theory and practice of criminal reconciliation in China. Peking: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Trevaskes, S. (2009). Restorative justice or mcjustice with Chinese characteristics? In M. Farquhar (Ed.), 21st century China: Views from Australia (pp. 77–96). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Wang, G., & Liu, H. (2009). The status quo, problems and solutions for the pilot work of criminal reconciliation [xingshi hejie shidian gongzuo de xianzhuang, wenti ji duice]. In Y. H. Song & J. Yuan (Eds.), Theory and practice of criminal reconciliation in China. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Xiang, Y. (2013). Criminal mediation in mainland China: A leap from judicial endeavor to legal norm. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(4),247–256.Google Scholar
  17. Xiao, W., & Zhang, G. (2010). The dilemma and the way out for criminal mediation [xingshi hejie de kunjing yu chulu]. Journal of Law Application, 4, 7–10.Google Scholar
  18. Yang, B., & Jin, S. (2009). Constraints in the application of criminal mediation at the prosecution level and its solutions [xingshi hejie zai jiancha huanjie shiyong zhong de zhiyue yinsu ji duice]. In Y. Song & J. Yuan (Eds.), Theory and practice of criminal reconciliation in China [woguo xingshi hejie de lilun yu shijian] (pp. 158–168). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Zhang, X. (2004). A restorative justice audit of the Chinese criminal justice system. London: The London School of Economic and Political Science.Google Scholar
  20. Zhao, G. (2008). Criminal reconciliation: Concerns, confusion and solutions [xingshi hejie zhidu de zhidu yinyou, shijian kunhuo ji jiejue lujin]. Paper presented at the symposium on criminal reconciliation and procedural diversions [xingshi hejie yu chengxu fenliu yantaohui], Beijing.Google Scholar
  21. Zhou, L., & Cong, M. (2001). Criminology in China: Perspectives and development. In J. Liu, L. Zhang, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), Crime and social control in a changing China (pp. 57–63). Westport/London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoyu Yuan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeShanghai University of Political Science and LawShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations