Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Xiaoyu Yuan
Chapter
  • 184 Downloads
Part of the Springer Series on Asian Criminology and Criminal Justice Research book series (SSACCJR)

Abstract

In this final chapter, I will start by summarizing the answers to the research questions raised in the first chapter – how are the restoration of harm and interpersonal relationships embodied in the current criminal mediation as a means of conflict resolution in China; in what ways do Chinese mediation practices converge with and diverge from RJ in the West; to what extent can the restoration model in the West be replicated in China; and what adaptations should be made? At the same time, this concluding chapter tries to highlight the implications of the Chinese way of implementing restorative justice for its Western counterparts and to offer some possible solutions to improve Chinese mediation practices. It will also reflect upon the methodology for the sake of future study. Finally, this chapter will advance the analysis of how to enrich the current understanding of RJ through the case study of China.

References

  1. Ashworth, A. (2002). Responsibilities, rights and restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 578–595. doi: 10.1093/bjc/42.3.578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonafé-Schmitt, J.-P. (2013). Restorative justice and penal mediation: The French exception. In D. Cornwell, J. Blad, & M. Wright (Eds.), Civilising criminal justice: An international restorative agenda for penal reform. Hampshire: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice, 25, 1–127. doi: 10.2307/1147608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, J. (2000). Repentance rituals and restorative justice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(1), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cain, M. (2000). Orientalism, occidentalism and the sociology of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 239–260. doi: 10.1093/bjc/40.2.239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delury, J. (2008). “Harmonious” in China. Policy Review, (148), 35–44.Google Scholar
  8. Fan, Z. (2011). Law of feelings and the Chinese [Qingli fa he zhongguo ren]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Green, S. (2014). Crime, community and morality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hsieh, M. L., & Boateng, F. D. (2015). Perceptions of democracy and trust in the criminal justice system: A comparison between Mainland China and Taiwan. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(2), 153–173. doi: 10.1177/1057567715570050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnstone, G. (2004). How, and in what terms, should restorative justice be conceived? In H. Zehr & B. Toews (Eds.), Critical issues in restorative justice (pp. 5–15). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Lai, Y. L., Cao, L., & Zhao, J. S. (2010). The impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: A comparison between China and Taiwan. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 934–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morris, A. (2002). Critiquing the critics. A brief response to critics of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ren, X. (1997). Tradition of the law and law of the tradition: Law, state and social control in China. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  15. Trevaskes, S. (2009). Restorative justice or mcjustice with Chinese characteristics? In M. Farquhar (Ed.), 21st century China: Views from Australia (pp. 77–96). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Van Dijk, J. (2009). Free the victim: A critique of the western conception of victimhood. International Review of Victimology, 16(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Walgrave, L. (2014). Restorative justice is not a panacea against all social evils. Paper presented at the ESF exploratory workshop on critical justice, Leuven, October 15–17, 2014.Google Scholar
  18. Weitekamp, E. G. M. (2000). Research on victim-offender mediation. Findings and needs for the future. In T. E. F. f. V.-O. Mediation (Ed.), Victim-offender mediation in Europe (pp. 99–121). Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Young, R. (2001). Just cops doing “shameful” business?: Police-led restorative justice and the lessons of research. In A. Morris & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation & circles (pp. 195–225). Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoyu Yuan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeShanghai University of Political Science and LawShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations