Skip to main content

Plus ça Change? South Korea’s Democratization and the Politics of the Cold War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Quality of Democracy in Korea

Part of the book series: Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific ((CSAP))

  • 675 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the relationship between the division of the Korean peninsula and domestic political contestation in South Korea after democratization. Even though mainstream analysis has tended to place the blame for the persistence of the division system squarely on the North’s provocations, this chapter suggests that a comprehensive understanding of the vicissitudes of inter-Korean relations requires analysis of how the South’s policymaking toward the North reflects post-war domestic political contestation and how South Korea’s administrations have differed in how they treat the nexus between inter-Korean policy and national development goals. As I argue, national division and the broader context of the Cold War led to the rise of a conservative historical bloc which oversaw South Korea’s process of catch-up industrialization under the auspices of an authoritarian developmental state allied to the US. Following the democratic transition, however, the emerging liberal-progressive camp sought to challenge the ideological underpinnings of the conservative historical bloc through establishing a new framework for inter-Korean relations in the form of the Sunshine Policy. As such, North Korea policy quickly became an intense issue of confrontation between the conservative and liberal/left camps. More recently, Park Geun-hye’s Trustpolitik represents the (re)subordination of the goal of improved relations with the North to domestic political considerations. As such, the relationship of democracy to inter-Korean relations is in a double bind, with negative implications for the quality of democracy in South Korea. It is highly questionable to what degree liberal democracy can properly function in South Korea in a state of continued national division. At the same time, however, domestic political competition means that the national division is becoming ever more intractable.

An earlier version of this chapter was published in the journal North Korean Review (Spring 2016), under the title of “Between Politics and Economics in Seoul’s North Korea Policy.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrighi, G. (1996). The Rise of East Asia: World Systemic and Regional Aspects. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16(7/8), 6–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. T. (2004). The Battle for Asia: From Decolonization to Globalization. London: Routledge Curzon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, R. (2005). Divided Korea: Toward a Culture of Reconciliation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceuster, K. D. (2001). The Nation Exorcised: The Historiography of Collaboration in South Korea. Korean Studies, 25(2), 207–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. (2012). Economic Cooperation Between the Two Koreas. North Korean Review, 8(2), 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D. (2013). Foreign Policy Mired in Morality. JoonAng Daily [Online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, S. H. (2010). Korean Tensions Grow as South Curbs Trade to North. The New York Times [Online]. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/24/world/asia/24korea.html?_r=0

  • Chung, Y. T. (2002). Refracted Modernity and the Issue of Pro-Japanese Collaborators in Korea. Korea Journal, 42(3), 18–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. (2003). Democratization in South Korea and Inter-Korean Relations. Pacific Affairs, 76(1), 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. (2006). The Changing Character of Strikes in Vietnam. Post-Communist Economies, 18(3), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumings, B. (1984). The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product cycles, and Political Consequences. International Organization, 38(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2004). The Quality of Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucette, J., & Koo, S. W. (2013). Distorting Democracy: Politics by Public Security in Contemporary South Korea. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 11(48). Available at: http://www.japanfocus.org/-Se_Woong_-Koo/4042

  • Foster-Carter, A. (2016). Why North Korea Will Benefit from Seoul’s Great Leap Backwards. The Guardian [Online]. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/12/why-north-korea-benefit-from-seoul-closing-kaesong-industrial-complex-south-korea. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.

  • Gill, S. (2002). Power and Resistance in the New World Order. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gills, B. K. (2000). The Crisis of Postwar East Asian Capitalism: American Power, Democracy and the Vicissitudes of Globalization. Review of International Studies, 26(3), 381–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, J., & Choi, Y. J. (2014). The Chaebol and the US Military–Industrial Complex: Cold War Geopolitical Economy and South Korean Industrialization. Environment and Planning A, 46(5), 1160–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, K., & Jang, Y. (2015). Labour Unrest in the Global Political Economy: The Case of China’s 2010 Strike Wave. New Poltiical Economy, 20(4), 594–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982). Limits to Capital. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, J. (1993). The USA and the Rise of East Asia Since 1945: Dilemmas of the Postwar International Political Economy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, J. (2008). Does the Sun Still Shine? The Republic of Korea’s Policy of Engagement With the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Asian Affairs, 39(1), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. I. (2005). The Dilemma of Korean Conservatism. Korea Journal, 45(1), 202–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, T. (2011). Kyǒnghyǒpsaǒp kwaemyǒlsangt’ae … chungguggiǒbeman choǔnil [The Destruction of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation Projects … Its Only Good for Chinese Companies]. The Hankyoreh [Online]. Available at: http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/opinion/column/479518.html

  • KCNA. (2013). S. Korean Authorities Accused of Fully Opening Minutes of Inter-Korean Summit to Public. KCNA [Online]. Available at: http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2013/201306/news27/20130627-01ee.html

  • KCNA. (2014). NDC Inspection Team Demands End to Vicious Cycle of Confrontation Caused by “Cheonan” Warship Sinking Case. KCNA [Online]. Available at: www.kcna.co.jp/item/2014/201403/news26/20140326-01ee.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.

  • Kim, H. N. (2008). The Lee Myung-Bak Government’s North Korea Policy and the Prospects for Inter-Korean Relations. International Journal of Korean Studies, XII(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankov, A. (2009). Why the United States Will Have to Accept a Nuclear North Korea. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 21(3), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2012). ROK Policy on North Korea and Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation: Prospects and Analyses. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 21(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W., & Gray, K. (2016). Neo-Colonialism in South-South Relations?: The Case of China and North Korea. Development and Change, 47(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, N. D., & Han, Y. (2002). Sunshine in Korea: The South Korean Debate over Policies Toward North Korea. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, C., & Lee, S. (2009). Military Spending and the Arms Race on the Korean Peninsula. Asian Perspective, 33(4), 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noh, H. (2014). Ministry Painting All Progressive Activities as “Pro-North Korea.” The Hankyoreh [Online]. Available at: http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/654608.html

  • Paik, N. (2013). South Korean Democracy and Korea’s Division System. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(1), 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, G. (2011). A New Kind of Korea Building Trust Between Seoul and Pyongyang. Foreign Affairs, 90(5), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J. D. (2011). No Exit: North Korea, Nuclear Weapons and International Security. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quines, R. (2010). South Korea: The Story of ROKS Cheonan – Repression, Lies and Half Truths. Links: International Journal for Socialist Renewal. Available at: http://links.org.au/node/1871. Accessed 28 Oct 2010.

  • Sassoon, A. S. (1987). Gramsci’s Politics. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, K. (2012). The Dilemmas of Korea’s New Democracy in an Age of Neoliberal Globalisation. Third World Quarterly, 33(2), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sǒng, Y. (2010). Taebukchejeru kyǒnghyǒpkiǒp p’yǒnggyun p’ihaekaek “10ǒk” talhae [Sanctions on the North Cause Average Damages of 10 Billion a Year for Companies Engaged in Inter-Korean Cooperation]. Money Today. Available at: http://www.mt.co.kr/view/mtview.php?type=1&no=2010090810213428031&outlink=1

  • Song, H. (2011). Uriman chukŭra kangyo, yige musŭn shilyong chŏngbunya? [They Are Just Forcing Us to Die … What Kind of “Pragmatic Government” Is This?]. Donga Daily [Online]. Available at: http://news.donga.com/Politics/New/3/00/20110820/39654746/2

  • Stubbs, R. (2005). Rethinking Asia’s Miracle. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, K. Y. (2010). Security Crisis and Economic Interdependence: A Case Study of Inter-Korean Trade (2002–2006). Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Warwick. Available at: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/55779/

  • Thomas, P. D. (2006). Modernity as “Passive Revolution”: Gramsci and the Fundamental Concepts of Historical Materialism. Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 17(2), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. M. (1979). The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, H. (2002). Cultural Identity and Cultural Policy in South Korea. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gray, K. (2018). Plus ça Change? South Korea’s Democratization and the Politics of the Cold War. In: Mosler, H., Lee, EJ., Kim, HJ. (eds) The Quality of Democracy in Korea. Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63919-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics