Skip to main content

Sequence Patterns in Small Group Work Within a Large Online Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration and Technology (CRIWG 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10391))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A recent challenge in online learning courses is to establish collaboration in small groups. Group work in such courses often has to take place asynchronously, which puts additional requirements on communication and coordination to organise work in a productive way. This paper presents analyses of sequences of actions performed by such small learning groups during collaborative editing of texts in an online tool as part of a university-level online course. There were no face-to-face sessions and coordination between group members was supported by providing discussion forums. Actions of the group members in the forum or the writing tool were encoded as different contribution types, namely coordination, monitoring, minor contribution, and major contribution. Sequences of those actions derived for particular groups were used to explore the differences in the working process between the groups. It is partially possible to attribute those differences in the action sequences to the type of group composition (heterogeneous vs. homogeneous groups). Furthermore, initial evidence could be found that groups with inactive members had difficulties with coordination and tend to start the work late. These insights can be used to design mechanisms to diagnose defective group work and to generate interventions in online learning courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://moodle.org.

References

  1. Grünewald, F., Meinel, C., Totschnig, M., Willems, C.: Designing MOOCs for the support of multiple learning styles. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 371–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Wichmann, A., Hecking, T., Elson, M., Christmann, N., Herrmann, T., Hoppe, H.U.: Group formation for small-group learning: are heterogeneous groups more productive? In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym 2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferschke, O., Howley, I., Tomar, G., Yang, D., Rosé, C.P.: Fostering discussion across communication media in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Gothenburgh, Sweden, vol. 451, pp. 459–466 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Staubitz, T., Pfeiffer, J., Renz, C., Willems, C., Meinel, C.: Collaborative learning in a MOOC environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, pp. 8237–8246. IATED, Seville (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ludwigsen, S.: Sociogenesis and cognition. The struggle between social and cognitive activities. In: Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R. (eds.) Transformation of Knowledge Through Classroom Interaction, pp. 302–318. Routledge, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tomar, G.S., Sankaranarayanan, S., Rosé, C.P.: Intelligent conversational agents as facilitators and coordinators for group work in distributed learning environments (MOOCs). In: AAAI 2016 Spring Symposium at Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piezon, S.L., Donaldson, R.L.: Online groups and social loafing: understanding student-group interactions. Online J. Dist. Learn. Admin. 8, 1 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts, T.L., Lowry, P.B., Sweeney, P.D.: An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member “Voice” in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 49, 28–43 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weinel, M., Bannert, M., Zumbach, J., Hoppe, H.U., Malzahn, N.: A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 513–521 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyewski, E., Krämer, N., Christmann, N., Elson, M., Erdmann, J., Hecking, T., Hermann, T., Hoppe, H.U., Rummel, N., Wichmann, A.: Is small group collaboration beneficial in large scale online courses? An investigation of factors influencing satisfaction and performance in group MOOCs. In: The 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), pp. 918–922. ISLS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erdmann, J., Rummel, N., Christmann, N., Malte Elson, R., Hecking, T., Herrmann, T., Hoppe, H.U., Krämer, N.C., Kyewski, E., Wichmann, A.: Challenges in implementing small group collaboration in large online courses. In: 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Philadelphia, PA, USA, vol. 2, pp. 625–628 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abbott, A., Tsay, A.: Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology review and prospect. Sociol. Meth. Res. 29, 3–33 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.: Clustering by means of medoids. In: Statistical Data Analysis Based on the L1-Norm and Related Methods. North-Holland, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frey, B.J., Dueck, D.: Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972–976 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Reimann, P.: Time is precious: variable- and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collaborative Learn. 4(3), 239–257 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cornwell, B.: Social Sequence Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge UP, New York (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is based on data collected in the context of the project “Pädagogische und technologische Konzepte für kooperatives Lernen in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)” funded by the Mercator Foundation, 2014–2016. The project was conducted cooperatively at University Duisburg-Essen and Ruhr University Bochum. We thank all our collaborators for their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorian Doberstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Doberstein, D., Hecking, T., Hoppe, H.U. (2017). Sequence Patterns in Small Group Work Within a Large Online Course. In: Gutwin, C., Ochoa, S., Vassileva, J., Inoue, T. (eds) Collaboration and Technology. CRIWG 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10391. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63874-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63874-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63873-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63874-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics