Advertisement

A Large Scale Multi-objective Ontology Matching Framework

  • Xingsi XueEmail author
  • Aihong Ren
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 81)

Abstract

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) is emerging as a state-of-the-art methodology to solve the ontology meta-matching problem. However, the huge search scale of large scale ontology matching problem stops MOEA based ontology matching technology from correctly and completely identifying the semantic correspondences. To this end, in this paper, a large scale multi-objective ontology matching framework is proposed, which works with three sequential steps: (1) partition the large scale ontologies into similar ontology segment pairs; (2) utilize MOEA to match the similar ontology segments in parallel; (3) select the representative ontology segment alignments, which are further aggregated to obtain the final ontology alignment. In addition, a novel multi-objective model is also constructed for ontology matching problem and the MOEA and entity similarity measure that could be used in this framework are also recommended. The experimental result shows the effectiveness of our proposal.

Keywords

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Large scale ontology matching Ontology partition 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61503082), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2016J05145), Scientific Research Startup Foundation of Fujian University of Technology (No. GY-Z15007), Fujian Province outstanding Young Scientific Researcher Training Project (No. GY-Z160149) and China Scholarship Council.

References

  1. 1.
    Bock, J., Hettenhausen, J.: Discrete particle swarm optimisation for ontology alignment. Inf. Sci. 192, 152–173 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dragisic, Z., Eckert, K., Euzenat, J., Faria, D., Ferrara, A., Granada, R., Ivanova, V., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Kempf, A.O., Lambrix, P., et al.: Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2014. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ontology Matching, vol. 1317, pp. 61–104. CEUR-WS. org (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Ischia Island, Italy, pp. 251–263, July 2002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martinez-Gil, J., Montes, J.F.A.: Evaluation of two heuristic approaches to solve the ontology meta-matching problem. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 26(2), 225–247 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rahm, E.: Towards large-scale schema and ontology matching. In: Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds.) Schema Matching and Mapping, pp. 3–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rijsberge, C.J.V.: Information retrieval. University of Glasgow, Butterworth, London (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.: Web ontology segmentation: analysis classification and use. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland UK, pp. 13–22, May 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xue, X., Pan, J.: A segment-based approach for large-scale ontology matching. Knowl. Inf. Syst., 1–18 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xue, X., Wang, Y.: Optimizing ontology alignments through a memetic algorithm using both matchfmeasure and unanimous improvement ratio. Artif. Intell. 223, 65–81 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xue, X., Wang, Y.: Using memetic algorithm for instance coreference resolution. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28(2), 580–591 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xue, X., Wang, Y., Hao, W.: Optimizing ontology alignments by using NSGA-II. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol. 12(2), 175–181 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information Science and EngineeringFujian University of TechnologyFuzhouChina
  2. 2.Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and ApplicationsFujian University of TechnologyFuzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsBaoji University of Arts and SciencesBaojiChina

Personalised recommendations