Skip to main content

Political Disaffection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Power in Spain

Abstract

This chapter analyzes political representatives’ perceptions of the causes of political indifference and mistrust in parties. The causes of mistrust have been divided into internal and external factors and it has been found that MPs tend to reveal that mistrust in parties is due particularly to internal factors in the parties themselves, particularly in cases of corruption. Despite this, MPs, especially representatives of the PP (People’s Party) and the PSOE (Spanish Workers’ Socialist Party), tend to minimize the scope of corruption in Spain compared to the perception of citizens. Furthermore, those MPs with more experience and leadership attribute the least importance to internal and external factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The variable takes the value of 0 for individuals who do not declare having had a known profession before entering politics (students and inactive individuals).

  2. 2.

    For the models presented in Table 9.3, logarithms of the ideological gaps were taken, since the distribution of the original variable had a very defined negative asymmetry.

  3. 3.

    Organic Law (OL) 8/2007, of 4th July, on the financing of political parties. This law was reformed in some aspects by the OL 5/2012, of 22nd October and by the OL 3/2015, of 30th March.

References

  • Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. American Political Science Review, 91(01), 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, H. M., Fugate, G. A., Preuhs, R. R., & Still, D. R. (2004). Satisfied? Institutional Determinants of Citizen Evaluations of Democracy. Politics & Policy, 32(1), 72–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government. American Political Science Review, 68(03), 973–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E. (2004). Economic Perceptions and Executive Approval in Comparative Perspective. Political Behavior, 26(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B., Gabriel, O., & Torcal, M. (2007). Political Confidence in Representative Democracies: Socio-Cultural vs. Political Explanations. In J. W. Van Deth, A. Westholm, & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 66–87). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1975). A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogue, M., & Zmerli, S. (2011). Introduction: The Context of Political Trust. In S. Zmerli & M. Hoogue (Eds.), Political Trust: Why Context Matters (pp. 1–12). Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, F. (2004). The Politics of Scandal in Contemporary Spain. Morality Plays, Social Trust and the Battle for Public Opinion. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(8), 1099–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, F., & Caínzos, M. (2004). La repercusión electoral de los escándalos políticos. Alcance y condiciones. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 10, 141–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, F., & Caínzos, M. (2006). How Far and Why Do Scandals Cost Votes? In J. Garrard & J. L. Newell (Eds.), Scandals in Past and Contemporary Politics (pp. 194–212). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, F., & Villoria, M. (2012). La corrupción en España (2004–2010): datos, percepción y efectos. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 138, 109–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. (1992). Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H.-D. (1998). Mapping Political Support in the 1990s. A Global Analysis. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R. (1982). Negativity in Political Perception. Political Behavior, 4(4), 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marien, S., & Hoogue, M. (2011). Does Political Trust Matter? An Empirical Investigation into the Relation Between Political Trust and Support for Law Compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. H. (1974). Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1999). Political Performance and Institutional Trust. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance (pp. 204–216). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (2006). Trust and Politics. In D. Castiglioni, J. W. Van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), Handbook of Social Capital (pp. 241–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1999). How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens? In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and Trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, S. J. (2000). Officials’ Misconduct and Public Distrust: Japan and the Trilateral Democracies. In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Democracies? (pp. 173–201). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. J. (1976). Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of The Selling the Pentagon. American Political Science Review, 70, 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 660–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Cuenca, I., & Barreiro, B. (2000). Los efectos de la acción de gobierno en el voto durante la etapa socialista (1982–1996). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, M. A. (2002). The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries. Journal of Politics, 64, 408–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, M. S. (1987). How Does Government Performance Influence Political Support? Political Behavior, 9(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmerli, S., & Hoogue, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political Trust: Why Context Matters. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jaime-Castillo, A.M., Bartolomé, E., Martínez-Cousinou, G. (2018). Political Disaffection. In: Coller, X., Jaime-Castillo, A., Mota, F. (eds) Political Power in Spain. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63826-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics