Skip to main content

Parliaments and the European Union

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter investigates the relationship Spanish members of national and regional parliaments have with the European Union (EU). Initially the main hypothesis relied on the “ever-closer union” approach. As Spain is one of the European countries that benefits most from European financial transfers, one would expect the Spanish parliamentary to be very EU-oriented. The final results, however, suggests a very different picture. Although Spanish parliamentarians’ opinion of the EU is generally positive, the data also demonstrated that the EU is virtually absent from their daily concerns. Indeed, the analysis shows that the relationship between the EU and Spanish parliamentarians is based on a so-called “permissive consensus”: Spanish parliamentarians are aware of the benefits and relevance of the EU, but the dynamics of Spanish politics remain clearly national and regional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors thank the members of the research group who helped to improve the quality of this chapter, especially Fabiola Mota, Mariano Torcal and Manuel Alcántara for their useful comments and suggestions.

  2. 2.

    The Eurobarometer question was: “Generally speaking, do you think that Spain’s membership of the European Union is positive?”

  3. 3.

    Such as free trade, the common currency, or the freedom of movement of European citizens.

  4. 4.

    Only Poland received more in absolute terms, at almost 52,000 million euros.

  5. 5.

    Regions whose gross domestic product per inhabitant is less than 75% of the European average.

  6. 6.

    Other examples of EU-Spanish regional offices are the Delegación de Euskadi for the Basque Country, Delegación del Gobierno de la Generalitat de Cataluña for Catalonia, the Oficina en Bruselas de la Fundación Galicia Europa for Galicia and the Delegación de la Junta de Andalucía en Bruselas for Andalusia.

  7. 7.

    Seventy six percent of MPs did not respond to this question, a figure which seems to indicate that Spanish MPs do not consider this an important question.

  8. 8.

    PP: People’s Party.

  9. 9.

    PSOE: Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party.

  10. 10.

    IU: United Left.

  11. 11.

    CiU: Convergence and Union; ERC: Republican Left of Catalonia.

  12. 12.

    English and French are the foreign languages that the MPs speak the most (question I36).

  13. 13.

    In 1999, the European Parliament forced Jacques Santer’s Commission to resign because of evidence of corruption among its members.

  14. 14.

    According to Poguntke and Webb (2005), presidentialization is based on the increasing globalization of politics and the necessity for quick and coordinated decisions in the face of global challenges, the relevance of media and the erosion of traditional allegiances. This has resulted in the personalization of electoral campaigns, the concentration of power in the national executives and the asymmetry of power between the leader parties and their militants.

  15. 15.

    EU citizens already have the right to vote in local and EU elections.

  16. 16.

    PNV: Basque Nationalist Party.

  17. 17.

    UPN: Navarrese People’s Union.

References

  • Abélès, M. (1992). La vie quotidienne au Parlement européen. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ares Castro-Conde, C. (2007). El sistema de alerta temprana para el control del principio de subsidiariedad en la Unión Europea y los parlamentos autonómicos: diagnosis y prognosis. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 136, 213–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biezen, I., & Hopkin, J. (2005). The Presidentizalization of Spanish Democracy: Sources of Prime Ministerial Power in Post-Franco Spain. In T. Poguntke & P. Webb (Eds.), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (pp. 106–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2003). Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe. In K. Featherstone & C. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (pp. 57–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruter, M. (2003). On What Citizens Mean by Feeling ‘European’: Perceptions of News, Symbols and Borderless-Ness. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cienfuegos Mateo, M. (2001). Las Cortes Españolas ante la integración española. In C. Closa (Ed.), La Europeanización del sistema político español (pp. 359–384). Madrid: Istmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIS. (2010). Barómetro de junio. Estudio 2838. Madrid: CIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, O., & Saint-Martin, F. (2009). Le Parlement européen. Paris: La Documentation Française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G., & Rumford, C. (2005). Is there a European Identity? European Self-Understanding Beyond Unity and Diversity. In G. Delanty & C. Rumford (Eds.), Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization (pp. 50–68). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirección General de los Fondos Comunitarios. (2007). Marco Nacional Estratégico de Referencia. Madrid: Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, J. (2012). Las comunidades autónomas y la UE desde una perspectiva teórica: ¿superando los enfoques existentes? Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 99, 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Eurobarometer-Report 66. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favell, A., & Guiraudon, V. (2009). The Sociology of the European Union: An Agenda. European Union Politics, 10(4), 550–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOBEX. (2013). Conferencia para Asuntos Relacionados con la Unión Europea (CARUE). Madrid: GOBEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harguindéguy, J. B., & Bray, Z. (2009). Does Cross-Border Co-operation Empower European Regions? The Case of INTERREG III-A France-Spain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(4), 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., Nielsen, F., Ray, L., & Salk, J. (1996). Competencies, Cracks and Conflicts. Regional Mobilization in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 164–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayoral, J. (2011). Democratic Improvements in the European Union Under the Lisbon Treaty. Institutional Changes Regarding Democratic Government in the EU, EUDO Institutions, 2011, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S. (1995). Regional Lobbying in the New Europe. In M. Rhodes (Ed.), The Regions and the New Europe (pp. 78–104). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S., & Mitchell, J. (1993). Europe of the Regions? Territorial Interests and European Integration: The Scottish Experience. In S. Mazey & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying in the European Community (pp. 95–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, L. (2008). Permitive Consensus. In L. McGowan (Ed.), A Dictionary of the European Union (p. 389). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, E. (2000). Europeanization and Citizenship in the European Union. In R. Harmsen & T. Wilson (Eds.), Europeanization: Institution, Identities and Citizenship (pp. 157–177). Atlanta: Rodopi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morata, F. (2010). Decentralization and the Spanish Territorial State. In R. Scully & R. Wyn-Jones (Eds.), Europe, Regions and European Regionalism (pp. 134–154). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1997). Representation and the Democratic Deficit. European Journal of Political Research, 32(2), 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocaña, F., & Oñate, P. (2006). Las arenas electorales en España y la normalidad de la convocatoria de marzo de 2004. In J. Molins & P. Oñate (Eds.), Elecciones y comportamiento electoral en la España multinivel (pp. 23–76). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. (2002). The Many Faces of Europeanisation. ARENA Working Papers, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palau, A. (2013). La europeización de la agenda legislativa estatal y autonómica (1986–2007). Revista de Estudios Políticos, 160(3), 69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picarella, L. (2009). Presidencialización y personalización en el sistema político español, 1975–2008. Revista Enfoques, 7(11), 517–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies. In T. Poguntke & P. Webb (Eds.), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, C., Torreblanca, J. I., & Sorroza, A. (2005). Construir Europa desde España: los nuevos desafíos de la política europea. Informe del Real Instituto Elcano, 2, 3–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., Green Cowles, M., & Caporaso, J. (2001). Europeanisation and Domestic Change: Introduction. In M. Green Cowles, J. Caporaso, & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and Domestic Change (pp. 1–21). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2000). Building Europe: The Cultural Politics of European Integration. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strath, B., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2003). Representations of Europe and the Nation in Current and Prospective Member-States: Media, Elites and Civil Society – The Collective State of the Art and Historical Reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmolka Vida, I. (2008). El apoyo de los españoles al proceso de integración europea: factores afectivos, utilitaristas y políticos. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 122(2), 55–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J., & Wessels, W. (1997). An Ever-Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Macropolitical View on Integration Process. Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(2), 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (1996). Verwaltung im EG-Mehrebenensystem: Auf Dem Weg in die Megabürokratie? In M. Jachtenfuchs & B. Kohler-Koch (Eds.), Europaïsche Integration (pp. 15–46). Opladen: Leske und Buderich.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mayoral, J.A., Carillo-López, A., Harguindéguy, JB. (2018). Parliaments and the European Union. In: Coller, X., Jaime-Castillo, A., Mota, F. (eds) Political Power in Spain. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63826-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics