Advertisement

European Strategies for e-Governance to 2020 and Beyond

Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 32)

Abstract

This chapter examines both academic and grey literature on the transitions and developments in e-government towards notions of open government and open governance. This is viewed through the prism of European level strategies, the EU’s research and innovation programmes, as well as common strategies like the European E-Government Action Plan agreed to by all EU Member States. The three strands of the proposed European open governance setting, consisting of open data, open service and open process, are examined, as is the conceptualization of government as an open source service platform as well as a broader platform for collaboration between all societal actors. The purpose is to support societal-wide innovation for tackling pressing societal challenges where the role of ICT is seen more broadly than has traditionally been the case, i.e. as a general purpose technology. In this context, the chapter also examines emerging technologies likely to impact government in the short as well as longer-term, such as big data, artificial intelligence, drones and blockchain.

References

  1. Anderson C (2012) Makers: the new industrial revolution. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bason C (2010) Leading public sector innovation: co-creating for a better society. Policy Press, Bristol, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedikt Frey C, Osborne MA (2013) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerization? Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevir M (2013) A theory of governance. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesbrough HW (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cordella A, Bonina CM (2012) A public value perspec-tive for ICT enabled public sector reforms: a theoretical reflection. Gov Inf Q 29:512–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunleavy, P and Margetts H "New public management is dead: long live digital era governance", J Public Adm Res Theory, July 2006Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2010) A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, 2010–2010. http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf
  9. European Commission (2013a) A vision for public services. Prepared by DG CONNECT after an expert workshop and open public consultation. http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/vision-public-services
  10. European Commission (2013b) Powering European Public Sector Innovation: towards a new architecture. Report of the Expert Group on Public Sector Innovation, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Innovation UnionGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission (2014) EU anti-corruption report. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Brussels, 3.2.2014 COM(2014) 38 final. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/documents/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/corruption/docs/acr_2014_en.pdf
  12. European Commission (2016) Communication on EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016–2020 – accelerating the digital transformation of government. 19 April 2016: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-eu-egovernment-action-plan-2016-2020-accelerating-digital-transformation
  13. Gansky L (2010) The mesh – why the future of business is sharing. Penguin Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Gascó-Hernández (2014) Open government: opportunities and challenges for public governance. Springer Science + Business Media, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison TM, Pardo TA, Cook M (2012) Creating open government ecosystems: a research and development agenda. Future Internet 4(4):900–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons. Public Adm 69(Spring):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janssen M, Estevez E (2013) Lean government and platform-based governance: doing more with less. Gov Inf Q 30 Suppl 1:S1–S8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein N (2014) This changes everything. Penguin, Random House UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee G, Kwak YH (2012) An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Gov Inf Q 29(4):492–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDermott P (2012) Building open government. Gov Inf Q 27(4):401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Millard J (2011) Are you being served? Transforming e-government through service personalization. Int J Electron Govern Res 7(4)Google Scholar
  22. Millard J (2013) ICT-enabled public sector innovation: trends and prospects. Published in the proceedings of the 7th international conference on the Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2012), Seoul, 22–25 Octo 2013, the ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Millard J (2015) Open governance systems: doing ore with less. Gov Inf Q. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.003
  24. Moore MH (1995) Creating public value: strategic management in government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Niehaves B (2007) Innovation processes in the public sector – new vistas for an interdisciplinary perspective on e-government research? Electron Gov, vol. LCNS 4656. Springer, pp 23–34Google Scholar
  26. OECD (2014) OECD Foreign Bribery Report: an analysis of the crime of Bribery of Foreign Public Officials. http://www.oecd.org/corruption/oecd-foreign-bribery-report-9789264226616-en.htm
  27. Perez C (2009) Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. TOC/TUT working paper No. 20, 2009Google Scholar
  28. Rifkin J (2014) The zero-marginal cost society: the internet of things, the collaborative commons and the eclipse of capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Stoker G (2006) Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? Am Rev Public Adm 3(1):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tapscott D (2009) Grown up digital: how the net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Tepsie (2014) Research Programme Synthesis Report: final reports for practitioners, researchers, and policymakers. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research. http://www.tepsie.eu. Accessed 30 Jan 2015
  32. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Veenstra AF, Janssen M (2012) Investigating out-comes of t-government using a public value management approach. In Scholl HJ et al (eds) IFIP EGOV 2012, Springer LNCS 7443, Kristiansand, pp 187–197Google Scholar
  34. Weerakkody V, Dhillon G (2008) Moving from e-government to t-government: a study of process re-engineering challenges in a UK local authority perspective. Int J Electron Gov Res 4(4):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World Economic Forum (2016) The fourth industrial revolution: what it means and how to respond. http://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Danish Technological InstituteTaastrupDenmark

Personalised recommendations