Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Limitations of LCA Methodology Towards Sustainable Construction Materials

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017) (ISBS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 6))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an internationally accepted methodology for assessing the environmental impacts caused by the construction materials. The methodology described in the ISO 14040 standard series consists of goal and scope definition, Inventory Analysis (LCI), Impact Assessment (LCIA) and interpretation phases. While LCI is a phase where the inputs and outputs are calculated, LCIA aims at understanding and evaluating the magnitude and significance of the environmental impacts for a product system throughout the life cycle of the product. The LCA of the construction materials is different from other products because of a wide variety of materials, life cycle phases and the long service life. While the lack of environmental data and the implementation period of LCA restrict the use of the methodology; different goal and scopes, different limitations make difficult the comparisons of the studies. In this study, it was aimed to the promotion of the use of LCA. Brick is one of the common construction materials that cause several environmental impacts. Therefore, the recent studies on LCA of brick production were evaluated. The problems in the use of LCA for the construction materials were identified under the sub-headings;

  • The problems encountered in the goal and scope definition

  • The problems encountered in LCI

  • The problems encountered in LCIA

Finally, it was shown which gaps need to be filled for the methodology in the upcoming years. It is thought that LCA should continue to be improved as an analysis methodology which is still in development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23(1):28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fava JA (2006) Will the next 10 years be as productive in advancing life cycle approaches as the last 15 years? Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:6–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lasvaux S, Habert G, Peuportier B, Chevalier J (2015) Comparison of generic and product-specific LCA databases: application to construction materials used in building LCA studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1473–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. International Organization of Standardization (ISO) (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework, ISO/TR 14040: 2006(E). Geneva, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabeza LF, Rincon L, Vilarino V, Perez G, Castell A (2014) LCA and LCEA of buildings and the building sector: a review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 29:394–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rashid AFA, Yusoff S (2015) A review of LCA method for building industry. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 45:244–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Almeida MI, Dias AC, Demertzi M, Arroja L (2015) Contribution to the development of product category rules for ceramic bricks. J Clean Prod 92:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bribian IZ, Capilla AV, Uson AA (2011) Life cycle assessment of construction materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46:1133–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koroneos C, Dompros A (2007) Environmental assessment of brick production in Greece. Build Environ 42:2114–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sunil Kumar CP, Parvathi S, Rudramoorthy R (2016) Impact categories through life cycle assessment of coal-fıred brick. Procedia Technol 24:531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez Aguilar HA, Huerta Reynoso EA, Gomez JA (2016) Life cycle assessment of regional brick manufacture. Materiales de Construccion 66(322). ISSN-L: 0465-2746

    Google Scholar 

  12. Talang RPN, Sirivithayapakorn S (2016) Application of life cycle assessment of fired brick production plant in Thailand. Appl Environ Res 38(3):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ali AAM, Negm AM (2014) Environmental impacts assessment of the Egyptian brick types using life cycle assessment tool. In: avniR Conference, Life Cycle in Practice, France

    Google Scholar 

  14. Christoforou E, Kylili A, Fokaides PA, Ioannou I (2016) Cradle to site life cycle assessment of adobe brick. J Cleaner Prod 112:443–452

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kulkarni NG, Rao AB (2016) Carbon footprint of solid clay bricks fired in clamps of India. J Cleaner Prod 135:1396–1406

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lotteau M, Loubet P, Pousse M, Dufrasnes E, Sonnemann G (2015) Critical review of LCA for the built environment at the neighborhood scale. Build Environ 93:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ecoinvent (2009) The life cycle inventory data. V. Switzerland, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Swiss

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Organization of Standardization (ISO) ISO14025 (2006) Environmental labels and declarations, type III environmental declarations, principles and procedures, ISO 14025:2006(E). Geneva, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kellenberger D, Althaus HJ, Jungbluth N, Künniger T, Lehmann M, Thalmann P (2007) Life cycle inventories of building products, final report ecoinvent data v2.0 no 7. EMPA-Swiss Centre for life cycle inventories, Dübendorf

    Google Scholar 

  21. UNEP (2015) Brick production. United Nations Environment Program. http://www.unep.org

  22. Bilec MM (2007) A hybrid life cycle assessment model for construction process. PhD thesis, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suh S, Huppes G (2009) Methods in the life cycle inventory of a product. In: Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, vol 23. pp 263–282

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment, part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:374–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bare JC (2010) Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs. Clean Techn Environ Policy 2:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guinee JB, Gorree M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, Koning A, Oers L, Wegener SA, Sub S, Udo de Haes HA, Bruijn H, Duin R, Huijbregts M AJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. II a: guide. II b: operational annex. III: scientific background. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, ISBN 1-4020-0228-9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pennington DW, Margni M, Amman C, Jolliet O (2005) Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus non-spatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe. Environ Sci Technol 39(4):1119–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huijbregts MAJ, Rombouts LJA, Hellweg S, Frischknecht R, Hendriks AJ, van de Meent D, Ragas AMJ, Reijnders L, Struijs J (2005) Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environ Sci Technol 40(3):641–648

    Google Scholar 

  29. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW et al (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB et al (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge, UK and IPCC, New York. Available on line at http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data.htm

  30. Goedkoop MJ (1995) The eco-indicator 95. Final report (in English). NOH Report 9523, PRe consultants, Amersfoort, NL

    Google Scholar 

  31. Consultants P (2000) Eco-indicator 99 manual for designers. Ministry of housing, spatial planning and the environment, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bengoa X, Margni M (2002) IMPACT 2002+: user guide, vol 21

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lijing G, BoRong L, Daojin G, Ying XZ (2008) An endpoint damage oriented model for life cycle environmental impact assessment of buildings in China. Chin Sci Bull 53(23):3762–3769

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huppes G, van Oers L (2011) Background review of existing weighting approaches in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 24997 EN, ISSN 1831-9424. https://doi.org/10.2788/88828

  35. Curran MA, Overly JG, Hofstetter P, Muller R, Lippiatt BC (2002) BEES 2.0, building for environmental and economic sustainability peer review report. NISTIR 6865, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  36. Building Research Establishment (2008) BRE global methodology for environmental profiles of construction products. SD6050

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bengtsson J, Howard N, Kneppers B (2010) Weighting of environmental impacts in Australia. Build Prod Innov Counc Aus Ind

    Google Scholar 

  38. Öztaş Karaman S (2015) A model proposal for life cycle impact assessment for the Turkish building materials sector. PhD thesis, Istanbul Technical Uni., Institute of Science, Architecture Dept., Istanbul, Turkey (Advisor: L. Tanaçan)

    Google Scholar 

  39. British Standard (BS), European Standard (EN), BS EN15804 (2012) Sustainability of construction works: environmental product declarations, core rules for the product category of construction products. pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Architecture, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Turkey

    Saniye Karaman Öztaş

Authors
  1. Saniye Karaman Öztaş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saniye Karaman Öztaş .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

    Seyhan Fırat

  2. University of South Wales, Pontypridd, United Kingdom

    John Kinuthia

  3. The British University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Abid Abu-Tair

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karaman Öztaş, S. (2018). The Limitations of LCA Methodology Towards Sustainable Construction Materials. In: Fırat, S., Kinuthia, J., Abu-Tair, A. (eds) Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017). ISBS 2017. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63709-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63708-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63709-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation