Advertisement

Two Examples on Urban Renewal in Eskişehir

  • Hesna Topçu
  • Özlem Mumcu Uçar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)

Abstract

This study explores architectural and interior design features of the residential housing projects built in the Eskişehir Tepebaşı region along the 1st and 2nd Ismet Inonu Avenues, and focuses on the rapid transition that these projects carried out within that area. Construction was not permitted in this area until 2007, due to its historical importance as the city’s former industrial area. With an emphasis on residential housing projects, construction commenced in 2009, and since then, the area has evolved into a popular residential and commercial center. Along with this popularity, the demand for these residential projects, as real estate, has also increased. The typology of these buildings features an atrium with either four or eight stories, hotel-style design and various advanced technologies of the day. The projects were conceived as highly exclusive residential houses offering residents special utilities such as professional facility management, access control systems, social areas, fitness, recreational facilities, parking lots and security services. The first residence project, Eldem Residence, was built in 2009. It was followed in 2011 by Aytepe Residences and the Akademia Suites projects, which were in turn followed by Başak, Two Towers and Atrium Park. The intensive urban renewal of the former industrial area has continued rapidly since then.

Keywords

Residence house Interior design Urban renewal Lifestyle 

References

  1. 1.
    Tosun E (2007) Spatial, social and cultural change in urbanization in the process of globalization: the case of Bursa. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tekeli İ (2011) Settlement systems and settlement in Anatolia. Tarih Vakfı, Yurt Publications, Istanbul (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duran CS (2009) High density housing new housing trends in large cities (trans: Özer DN). YEM Publications, Istanbul, p 6 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altun TAD (2008) New life styles: closed housing campuses. DEÜ Eng Fac J Sci Eng 10(3):73–83 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arcan E, Evci F (1999) Architectural design approach. Design Publishing Group, İstanbul (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blakely E, Snyder M (1997) Divided we fall: gated and walled communities in the United States. In: Ellin N (ed) Architecture of fear. Princeton Architectural Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasol D (2002) Encyclopedic architecture dictionary. YEM Publishing (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Çıkış S, Ek Fİ (2009) The imaginary transformation of the concept of luxury in the housing: luxury multi-storey houses in the city of Izmir. J Arch 348:65 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yüksel U, Akbulut MT (2009) New products in consumption-focused architecture in recent years: residences. J YTÜ 111 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Firidin Özgür E (2010) New trends in housing areas of Istanbul—Part 1. İnşaat Dünyası (329):210–216 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Çerçi E (2010) Urban development from housing interview and design forecasts for the future in the case of residential type in Istanbul. ITU, Ms thesis (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harvey D (1997) The situation of post modernity (trans: Küçük M). Metis Publications, Ankara (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Görgülü T, Koca SK (2007) Changes in the forms of housing in Turkey: recent consumption focused housing. J Arch 337:34 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bali R (2002) New elements, new spaces, new lives to life style from Tarz-ı Hayat. İletişim Publishing, p 37 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aksoylu S (2012) The effects of industrial facilities in the period of republican period on the spatial development of Eskişehir, Eskiyeni. Mon City Cult Mag, Year 4, Issue 46:48 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mumcu Uçar Ö, Özsoy A (2006) A spatial approach to boundary concept: Bahçelievler Example. J ITU Arch Plan Design 15 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Topçu H (2015) An investigation on interior features of residence houses: “Eskişehir Example”. Anadolu University, Institute of Fine Arts, Eskişehir, Turkey (in Turkish)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, School for the HandicappedAnadolu UniversityEskişehirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Interior Design, Faculty of Architecture and DesignAnadolu UniversityEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations