Advertisement

Comparison Between Theoretical and Practical Compression Capacities of Deep/Long Piles in Dubai

  • Mohamed Nabil Omar
  • Abid Abu Tair
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)

Abstract

The rate of build high-rise buildings has accelerated rapidly over the last few decades, due to rapid urbanization and significant improvements in the field of the high-rise construction and technology. Many challenges were faced by the engineers in the design and construction of such buildings. One of the major challenges was the foundation systems, which are required to ensure the stability of the buildings. The common type of foundation system which is used in case of high-rise buildings is piles foundation system. Furthermore, in the most standards and codes of practice such as British Standard, the piles specifications and recommendations are stated for short piles which has a maximum depth range between 18.0 and 20.0 m. As well as, the theoretical equations for pile design, charts and different soil factors and parameters are based on old studies of short piles behavior. In this research, a comparison was conducted between the theoretical pile compression capacity which is calculated from the theoretical equations and the practical pile compression capacity which is derived from the results of pile’s static load test. The study covered three different cases of bored piles constructed in U.A.E. especially in Dubai. The piles used in this research have a depth ranging from 30.0 to 65.0 m. This type of piles is classified in this research as long or deep piles. A finite element model of each participated pile modeled by using PLAXIS 2D software, to judge between the practical and theoretical piles capacities. It was found that the theoretical compression pile capacity is 60–70% of the practical pile capacity with the same specifications (pile diameter and pile depth). As a conclusion of the results, the estimated piles diameter and depth in the concept design stage can be improved based on the results of this research.

Keywords

High-raise buildings Piles Long piles PLAXIS 2D Piling equipment 

References

  1. 1.
    Tomlinson M, Woodward J (2008) Pile design and construction practice, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brinkgreve R, Broere W, Al-Khoury R (2004) PLAXIS: 2D, version 8, 1st edn. Balkema, LisseGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    British standard code of practice for foundations (1986) 1st edn. British Standards Institution, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowles J (1977) Foundation analysis and design, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hobbs NB (1975) Review paper—Rocks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Settlement of Structures. British Geotechnical Society, Pentech Press, pp 579–610Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horvarth RG (1978) Field load test data on concrete-to-rock bond strength for drilled pier foundations, Publication: University of Toronto, no 78–07Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kulhawy FH, Goodman RE (1980) Design of foundations on discontinuous rock. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Foundations on Rock, vol 1. Sydney, pp 209–220Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kulhawy FH, Goodman RE (1987) Foundations in rock. In: Bell FG (ed) Ground Engineering Reference Book, chap 15. Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liang R, Zhang F (2010) Deep foundations and geotechnical in situ testing, 1st edn. ASCE, RestonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poulos H, Davis E (1980) Pile foundation analysis and design, 1st edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosenberg P, Journeaux NL (1976) Friction and end bearing tests on bedrock for high capacity socket design. Canadian Geotech J 13:324–333Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vesic AS (1970) Tests on instrumented piles, Ogeechee River site. J Soil Mech Found Div, Am Soc Civ Eng 96(SM2)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams AF, Pells PJN (1981) Side resistance rock sockets in sandstone, mudstone, and shale. Canadian Geotech J 18(4):502–513Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wyllie DC (1991) Foundations on Rock. E & FN Spon, 1st ednGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Engineering DepartmentBritish University in DubaiDubaiUAE

Personalised recommendations