The Importance of Geological Conditions’ Effects on Construction in Landscape Planning in Turkey

  • Emre Aytuğ Ozsoy
  • Gülgün Yılmaz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)


The development of the majority of the cities in Turkey from the point of urbanization were occurred without regard to the effects of the geological conditions of the region that were founded in the past. The settlement, transportation and industrialization greatly influence the natural environmental balance in a region. It is necessary to control the effects of such a development on the natural environment in order to prevent possible damage. For this reason, in addition to the social, cultural and economic conditions of the region, the geological and geotechnical conditions must be assessed very well. However, an urban development envisaged in such as principle may be a living city life with settlement, transportation and industrialization. It is an inevitable necessity and a responsibility at the same time to evaluate the geological structure of the ground, the geotechnical properties and the geological environmental conditions. The possible effects on the construction must be observed very well prior to the construction. The necessary precautions at the same time in the field of urban development are especially regarding the construction problems. In today’s urbanization, especially in the construction sector, the importance of geology can only be understand after the events such as earthquakes, floods, landslides, collapses and destruction, which are caused by geological reasons and property destruction caused by them. In this study, the place and importance of the effects of geological conditions in Turkey are investigated and the solutions tried to be proposed.


Landscape planning Geology Construction 


  1. 1.
    Arkoc O, Ozsahin B (2015) Impact of geology in urban planning, case study from Kirklareli, Kirklareli University. J Eng Sci 1:30–40Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fuchu D, Yuhai L, Sijing W (1994) Urban geology: a case study of Tongchuan city, Shaanxi Province, China. Eng Geol 38(1–2):165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martínez-Grañaa AM, Silvaa PG, Goya JL, Eleza J, Valdésa V, Zazob C (2017) Geomorphology applied to landscape analysis for planning and management of natural spaces. Case study: Las Batuecas-S. de Francia and Quilamas natural parks, (Salamanca, Spain). Sci Total Environ 584–585:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meshal MA, Rusty AF, Layla M, Steven W, Sorin P (2016) The use of remote sensing to develop a site history for restoration planning in an arid landscape. Restor Ecol 24(1):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Legget RF (1973) Cities and geology. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 654Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zervopoulou A, Pavlides S (2016) Geological mapping in urban areas. A case study from the inner city of Thessaloniki, Greece. In: 14th international proceedings of the bulletin of the geological society of Greece. Congress, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kasapoglu KE (1998) Geological factors affecting site selection in urban planning. Urbanization and geology symposium, Ankara, pp 51–57Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rahn PH (1996) Engineering geology—an environmental approach. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, p 657Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karakus K (2009) Urban planning and geology. Geology Chamber Publishing, 140, Ankara, p 184Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gocmez D (2005) Geological factors urban effect: Yalova Thermal Placement. MSc Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science, pp 21–25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Porsuk Vocational School, Department of ConstructionAnadolu UniversityEskisehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations