Determination of Local Site Soil Conditions by Microtremor Measurements for Sustainable Buildings

  • Bilal Ozaslan
  • Murat Emre Hasal
  • Ozan Subasi
  • Recep Iyisan
  • Hiroaki Yamanaka
  • Kosuke Chimoto
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)


As well known, local soil condition at a specific site affects the significant features of strong ground motion such as amplitude, frequency range and time duration. The effects of site condition depend on the properties of the motion characteristics, material properties, topography and geometry of the field. The bedrock slope at the basin sides also is one of the most important factors in the response analyzing of a specific site in geotechnical earthquake engineering applications. The reflection and refraction waves from the basin edges induce the wave transmission and two dimensional effects. In this case two dimensional site response analyses are required to estimate the behavior of the soil layers. So, local geotechnical site condition should be into account in the design of earthquake resistant building. The bedrock slope of the basin edges should be determined for suitable method in two dimensional dynamic response analyses. In this study, the result of a specific site response based on shear wave velocity profiles determined by microtremor array measurements are presented. The geotechnical properties of the soil layers were obtained from the previous subsurface explorations. Seismic bedrock depth and bedrock slope of the edge were defined by microtremor array measurements. Shear wave velocity value is from ten to hundred meters was obtained from passive surface wave method by employed Spatial Auto Correlation algorithm. Established variation of shear wave velocity with depth models were examined in terms of local site amplification. In order to verify consistency of obtained amplification numbers, empirical and measuremental results were compared for each site. As a conclusion, dynamic properties of local site conditions under earthquake excitation were described in terms of maximum amplification, resonance frequency and predominant period.


Microtremor array measurement Shear wave velocity model Soil amplification 


  1. 1.
    Misra A, Basu D (2011) Sustainability in geotechnical engineering internal geotechnical report 2011–2. Technical reports, University of ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kepçeoğlu Ö (2008) A microzonation study for Bursa-Güzelyalı region using microtremor measurements. M.Sc. Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aki K (1957) Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves with special reference to microtremors. Bull Earthq Res Inst 35:415–456MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okada H (2003) Microtremor survey method: SEG Geophysical Monograph Series No. 12Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamanaka H, Ishida H (1996) Application of genetic algorithms to an inversion of surface-wave dispersion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:436–444MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in-situ penetration test result. Digest 96, 371–374Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. Preprint 81–544, in situ testing to evaluate liquefaction susceptibility, ASCE National Convention, Missouri, p 81–544Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nogoshi M, Igarashi T (1971) On the amplitude characteristics of microtremors. J Seism Soc Japan 24:24–40(in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q Rep of RTRI 30(1):25–33Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kudo K, Sawada Y, Horike M (2004) Current studies in Japan on H/V and phase velocity dispersion of microtremors for site characterization. Presented at the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okada H (2006) Theory of efficient array observations of microtremors with special reference to the SPAC method. Explor Geophys 37:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hasal ME, İyisan R (2014) A numerical study on comparison of 1D and 2D seismic responses of a basin in Turkey. Am J Civil Eng 2(5):123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bilal Ozaslan
    • 1
  • Murat Emre Hasal
    • 2
  • Ozan Subasi
    • 1
  • Recep Iyisan
    • 1
  • Hiroaki Yamanaka
    • 3
  • Kosuke Chimoto
    • 3
  1. 1.Geotechnical EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of ConstructionBursa Metropolitan MunicipalityBursaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Science and TechnologyTokyo Institute of TechnologyYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations