Markov Chain Optimisation for Pavement Maintenance

  • Mohammed Al Aryani
  • Halim Boussabaine
  • Richard Kirkham
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)

Abstract

The highways network is crucial to the economic and social development of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The increase in capital spend on highways projects across the UAE has emphasised the importance of optimising the long-term operational and maintenance spend. This paper presents a case study of the application of Markov chains in the optimisation of pavement maintenance decision-making. The theoretical model utilises a simplified staged-homogenous Markov chain to predict future pavement conditions at the network level by comparing the pavement condition with planned maintenance activities against pavement condition without maintenance activities using a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) as the basis of the calculation. Also estimated budget for maintenance work has been achieved.

Keywords

Homogenous Markov chain Pavement performance Pavement condition index (PCI) Preventive maintenance Correctives maintenance 

References

  1. 1.
    Abaza KA, Ashur SA, Al-Khatib IA (2004) Integrated pavement management system with a Markovian prediction model. J Transp Eng 130(1):24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abaza KA (2002) Optimum pavement life-cycle analysis model. ASCE J Transp Eng 128(6):542–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abaza KA (2004) Deterministic performance prediction model for rehabilitation and management of flexible pavement. Int J Pavement Eng 5(2):111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abaza KA (2017) Empirical Markovian-based models for rehabilitated pavement performance used in a life cycle analysis approach. Struct Infrastruct Eng 13(5):625–636Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Turki UM, Ayar T, Yilbas BS, Sahin AZ (2014) Maintenance in manufacturing environment: an overview. In: Integrated maintenance planning in manufacturing systems, pp 5–23. American Conference on Managing Pavements (pp 2.3–2.19) and Hall, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ASTM D6433 (2007) Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys, D 6433—07. Retrieved 11 19, 2015, from http://www.cee.mtu.edu/~balkire/CE5403/ASTMD6433.pdf
  7. 7.
    Austroads (2012) The scoping and development of probabilistic road deterioration (RD) models, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Black M, Brint aT, Brailsford JR (2005) Comparing probabilistic methods for the assetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butt AA, Shahin MY, Carpenter SH, Carnahan JV (1994) Application of Markov process to pavement management systems at network level. In: 3rd international conference on managing pavements, vol 2, TRB, pp 159–172Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhillon B (2002) Engineering maintenance: a modern approach. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Enright MP, Frangopol DM (1999) Condition prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges using Bayesian updating. J Struct Eng 125(10):1118–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (1993) PONTIS technical manual, Publ. No. FHWA-SA-94–031, US Department of Transportation, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gini A (2015) Network-level pavement performance prediction modelling with Markov chains. Master dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haas R, Hudson WR, Zaniewski J (1994) Modern pavement management. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FLGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall K, Darter M, Elliott R (1992) Revision of AASHTO pavement overlay design procedures. Transportation Research Record 1374. TRB, Washington, DC, pp 36–47Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang Y (2004) Pavement analysis and design, 2nd edn. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang Y, Saito M, Sinha KC (1989) Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain. In: Transportation Research Record 1180, TRB, pp 25–32Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobayashi K, Do M, Han D (2010) Estimation of Markovian transition probabilities for pavement deterioration forecasting. KSCE J Civil Eng 14(3):343–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Labi S, Sinha K, Transportation J, Lafayette W, Building SO, Report F (2003) The effectiveness of maintenance and its impact on capital expendituresGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee J, Ni J, Djurdjanovic D, Qiu H, Liao H (2006) Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance. Comput Ind 57(6):476–489Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lytton R (1987) Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modeling. In: Second North American Conference on Managing Pavements, pp 2.3–2.19Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madanat S, Mishalani R, Ibrahim WHW (1995) Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data. J Infrastruct Syst 1(2):120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mamlouk MS, Zaniewski JP (2001) Optimizing pavement preservation: an urgent demand for every highway agency. Int J Pavement Eng 2(2):135–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430108901722
  24. 24.
    Mills L, Attoh-Okine N, McNeil S (2012) Developing pavement performance models for Delaware. In: Transportation research record 2304. Washington, DC: TRB, pp 97–103Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nams (2009) Building condition & performance assessment guidelines. Practice Note 3—Buildings. IPWEAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    OECD (2001) Asset management for the roads sector, vol 1. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ortiz-García JJ, Costello SB, Snaith MS (2006) Derivation of transition probability matrices for pavement deterioration modeling. J Transp Eng 132(2):141–161.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:2(141)
  28. 28.
    Pantelias A (2005) Asset management data collection for supporting decision processes. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park S (2004) Identifying the hazard characteristics of pipes in water distribution systems by using the proportional hazard model: 2. applications. KSCE J Civil Eng 8(6):669–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parzen E (1987) Stochastic processes. Soc Ind Appl Math, OaklandMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peters M (2003) Planning for choice, mobility and livability: the reauthorization of TEA-21. In: National planning conference proceedings, Denver. Available http://www.caed.asu.edu/apa/proceedings03/PETERS/peters.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
  32. 32.
    Shahin M (1994) Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots. Chapman, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thom N (2014) Principles of pavement engineering, 2nd edn. ICE Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Uday K, Parida A, Crespo Márquez A, Moreu de León P, Gómez Fernández J, Parra Márquez C, López Campos M (2009) The maintenance management framework: a practical view to maintenance management. J Qual Maintenance Eng 15(2):167–178Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weninger-Vycudil A (2008) Section based probabilistic performance prediction fiction or future? In: Proceedings of the 3rd European pavement and asset management conference, pp 1–10. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1084785

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Al Aryani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Halim Boussabaine
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Kirkham
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Structural Engineering DepartmentBritish University in DubaiDubaiUAE
  2. 2.School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil EngineeringThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations