Advertisement

Problems Encountered in the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Recycled Materials in Construction

  • John Kinuthia
  • Sara Marcelino
  • Jonathan Oti
  • Andres Seco
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)

Abstract

The establishment of sustainability credentials of emergent construction materials is very subjective, and most available tools such as BREEAM, CEQUAL, ARUP SpeAR among others are not fully quipped or equipped at all to deal with individual material systems. The main problem emanates from the challenges of the audit of each aspect of the material processing, and especially the quantification of the relevant transport, energy, environmental and other inputs into the composite product. Incorporation of materials with long and complex recycling processes further exacerbate the challenge. This paper reports on a simplified approach towards full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of seven clay-based brick products developed in UK and in Spain, based on known material data and estimated energy inputs in the manufacturing processes. In order to test the robustness of the proposed approach, results on UK-based bricks are compared with a parallel LCA on clay-based product developed in Spain. Finally, the clay-based products are compared with a typical Portland cement-based concrete block and fired clay brick. In the LCA, boundary conditions include fixed transport, thus attempting to factor only the (i) material ingredients, (ii) their known atmospheric emissions, and (iii) estimated energy inputs during processing. Results suggest that the most challenging aspect in the undertaking of LCA is the availability of reliable input data. Results also show that there are numerous parameters that can reliably and corroboratively facilitate the comparison of performance, besides carbon dioxide emissions.

Keywords

Clay Life cycle analysis Stabilisation Soil Cementation Sustainability 

References

  1. 1.
    Marcelino-Sádaba S, González-Jaen LF, Pérez-Ezcurdia A (2015) Using project management as a way to sustainability from a comprehensive review to a framework definition. J Clean ProdGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pope J (2006) What’s so special about sustainability assessment? J Environ Assess Policy ManagGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    JRC European commission (2011) ILCD handbook: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the European context. Vasa. 10.278/33030Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hossain MU, Poon CS, Lo IMC, Cheng JCP (2016) Evaluation of environmental friendliness of concrete paving eco-blocks using LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:70–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0988-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen C, Habert G, Bouzidi Y, Jullien A, Ventura A (2010) LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1231–1240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO 14040 (2006) Gestión ambiental Análisis del ciclo de vida Principios y marco de referenciaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    EU (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council on waste and repealing certain directivesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gala AB, Raugei M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2015) Introducing a new method for calculating the environmental credits of end-of-life material recovery in attributional LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:645–654.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0861-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schrijvers DL, Loubet P, Sonnemann G (2016) Developing a systematic framework for consistent allocation in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1063-3
  10. 10.
    Schrijvers DL, Loubet P, Sonnemann G (2016) Critical review of guidelines against a systematic framework with regard to consistency on allocation procedures for recycling in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flower DJM, Sanjayan JG (2007) Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:282–288.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-007-0327-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Habert G, D’Espinose De Lacaillerie JB, Roussel N (2011) An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: Reviewing current research trends. J Clean Prod 19:1229–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tait MW, Cheung WM (2016) A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three concrete mix designs. Int J Life Cycle Assess 847–860.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1045-5
  14. 14.
    Chen C, Habert G, Bouzidi Y, Jullien A (2010) Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation. J Clean Prod 18:478–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seco A, Ramírez F, Miqueleiz L, Garci B, Prieto E (2011) The use of non-conventional additives in Marls stabilization. Appl Clay Sci 51:419–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.12.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oti JE, Kinuthia JM, Bai J (2008) Developing unfired stabilized building materials in the UK. Proc Inst Civ Eng (ICE) J Eng Sustain 161(4):211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2008.161.4.211Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oti JE, Kinuthia JM, Bai J (2009) Engineering properties of unfired clay masonry. Eng Geol 107(3–4):130–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    BS EN 197-1:2000 (2000) Cement. Part 1: composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cementsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    BS EN 15167-2:2006 (2006) Ground granulated blast furnace slag for use in concrete, mortar and grout. Definitions, specifications and conformity criteriaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    European reference Life Cycle Database (ELCD) (2016) Life cycle inventory (LCI) data from front-running EU-level business associations and other sources for key materials, energy carriers, transport, and waste management. http://www.eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ELCD3/. Accessed on 26 Sept 2016
  21. 21.
    Oti JE, Kinuthia JM (2012) Stabilised unfired clay bricks for environmental and sustainable use. Appl Clay Sci 58:52–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. I: LCA in perspective. IIa: Guide. Iib: Operational annex. III: Scientific background. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. ISBN 1-4020-0228-9Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    CEMBUREAU (2015) Environmental product declaration (EPD) according to EN 15804 and ISO 14025. Portland-composite cement (CEM II) produced in Europe 1–10 (European life cycle data base). http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ELCD3/processList.xhtml
  24. 24.
    BS 6073-2:2008 (2008) Precast concrete masonry units. Guide for specifying precast concrete masonry unitsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    BS EN 771-1:2011 (2011) Specification for masonry units. Clay masonry unitsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Kinuthia
    • 1
  • Sara Marcelino
    • 2
  • Jonathan Oti
    • 1
  • Andres Seco
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of South WalesPontypriddUK
  2. 2.Department of Projects and Rural EngineeringPublic University of NavarrePamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations