Evaluation of Urban Transformation in Building Scale in Terms of Social Sustainability: Göztepe Case

  • Reycan Çetin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 6)


In this study, the social sustainability framework and the transformation processes realized in Kadıköy district of Istanbul were examined. Processes covering the general aspect of district have been discussed in detail in the context of social sustainability and related concepts of changing housing profile typology, the effects of street perception on identity, the effects of transformation on building quality on the quality of life and the change of the profile of urban residents in the neighborhood in terms of social sustainability.


Social sustainability Neighborhood Identity Sustainable community 


  1. 1.
    Implementing Regulation for the Law No. 6306, Official Gazette dated 7 October 2016 and numbered 29870Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Yalcintan MC, Çalışkan O, Çılgın K, Dündar U (2014) Transformation geography of Istanbul. New Istanbul Studies, Metis Yayınevi, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kadikoy Municipality’s Strategic Plan (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vallance S, Perkins H, Dixon J (2011) What is social sustainability? a clarification of concepts. Geoforum 42:342–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bramley G, Dempsey N, Power S, Brown C, Watkins D (2009) Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from British cities. Environ Plan A 41(9):2125–2142Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barton H, Davis G, Guise R (1995) Sustainable settlements: a guide for planners, designers and developers. University of the West of England and The Local Government Management Board, BristolGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arslan Avar A (2009) Triple dialectic of Lefbevre, determined, designed an lived space, TMMOB Ankara Şubesi Dosya 17Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobs (2015) The death and life of Great American Cities. Metis Publications, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Var E (2015) Urban rehabilitation and social sustainability: in case of Ortahisar, Trabzon Master thesisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Konuk S (2009) “A road of approach for planning: cultural sustainability, case of Kumkapi” İstanbul Technical University/Urban and Regional Planning/Urban PlanningGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dikmen B, Özçetin Z (2012) Front structure of Yozgat residences in the context of cultural and social sustainability 6. National Roof & Facade Symposium 12–13 Apr 2012 Uludağ University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Görükle, BursaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Land and Land Values, Istanbul Report, Revenue Administration (2015).
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Anon, Compiled from negotiations held in Göztepe neighborhood Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Information collected from Kadikoy Municipality, NETCAD information system data.
  18. 18.
    Tekeli İ (1994) The development of Istanbul, IULAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sağlam RL (2000) The change process of pattern and its reasons in Göztepe and Caddebostan in İstanbul, Graduated master thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Urban and Regional PlanningGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Şehsuvaroğlu BN (1969) Göztepe, Türkiye Turing ve Otomobil KurumuGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Şehsuvaroğlu BN (1971) Zeytinburnu Gecekondu Bölgesinde Ailelerin Sosyal Yapıları ve Bölgeden Göç, Sosyal Antropolji ve Etimoloji Bölümü Dergisi, Güz 33Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Compiled from interviews and advertisements made with real estate agents in the regionGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anon, Information received from Kadıköy Municipality Licensing DirectorateGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Architecture Faculty, Urban and Regional PlanningYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations